Cargando…
Biomechanical Comparison of Meniscal Allograft Root Fixation Techniques: Anterograde Interference Bone Plug Fixation Yields Favorable Results Compared to Transosseous Suture Fixation Alone
PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanical properties of 2 different fixation techniques (interference bone plug fixation vs transosseous suture fixation) of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus using a porcine model. METHODS: Twenty-six matched pairs of fresh-frozen juvenile domestic porcine knees...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.01.001 |
_version_ | 1784730157940998144 |
---|---|
author | Brzezinski, Andrzej Imbergamo, Casey Pfaff, William Tarapore, Rae Nasra, Matthew Simon, Michael Gatt, Charles |
author_facet | Brzezinski, Andrzej Imbergamo, Casey Pfaff, William Tarapore, Rae Nasra, Matthew Simon, Michael Gatt, Charles |
author_sort | Brzezinski, Andrzej |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanical properties of 2 different fixation techniques (interference bone plug fixation vs transosseous suture fixation) of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus using a porcine model. METHODS: Twenty-six matched pairs of fresh-frozen juvenile domestic porcine knees were used in this study. Specimens were randomly distributed among 3 groups: (1) native meniscus groups, (2) interference fixation, and (3) transosseous suture fixation. In each group, the posterior segments of the tested medial menisci were gripped with the freeze clamps and fixed to the tensile testing machine. Samples were preconditioned, followed by cyclic tension-relaxation for 1000 cycles between 10 and 30 N at 0.5 Hz and finally pulled to failure at a rate of 0.55 mm/s. The cyclic elongation, stiffness to failure, mode, and ultimate load to failure were recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in ultimate load to failure between the interference fixation (169.71 ± 71.98 N) and transosseous suture fixation (222.73 ± 72.40 N) groups (P = .118), both were significantly less than that of the native meniscus (405.46 ± 95.62) (P < .001). Interference fixation displayed cyclic elongation (1.04 ± 0.71 mm) and stiffness (69.10 ± 25.8 N/mm) that were not significantly different from the native meniscus tissue (0.78 ± 0.53 mm and 83.1 ±26.28 N/mm) (P = .359 and P = .224), in comparison to transosseous suture fixation, which did show increased cyclic elongation (1.85 ± 1.44 mm) (P = .047) and decreased stiffness (34.72 ± 10.2 N/mm) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Interference fixation of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus has superior cyclic elongation and stiffness when compared to transosseous suture fixation. Interference fixation and the native meniscus model have a similar stiffness and cyclic elongation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The significance of our study is that using interference fixation for meniscal allograft transplantation has the potential to reduce short term surgical failures as well as long term complication rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9210386 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92103862022-06-22 Biomechanical Comparison of Meniscal Allograft Root Fixation Techniques: Anterograde Interference Bone Plug Fixation Yields Favorable Results Compared to Transosseous Suture Fixation Alone Brzezinski, Andrzej Imbergamo, Casey Pfaff, William Tarapore, Rae Nasra, Matthew Simon, Michael Gatt, Charles Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanical properties of 2 different fixation techniques (interference bone plug fixation vs transosseous suture fixation) of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus using a porcine model. METHODS: Twenty-six matched pairs of fresh-frozen juvenile domestic porcine knees were used in this study. Specimens were randomly distributed among 3 groups: (1) native meniscus groups, (2) interference fixation, and (3) transosseous suture fixation. In each group, the posterior segments of the tested medial menisci were gripped with the freeze clamps and fixed to the tensile testing machine. Samples were preconditioned, followed by cyclic tension-relaxation for 1000 cycles between 10 and 30 N at 0.5 Hz and finally pulled to failure at a rate of 0.55 mm/s. The cyclic elongation, stiffness to failure, mode, and ultimate load to failure were recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in ultimate load to failure between the interference fixation (169.71 ± 71.98 N) and transosseous suture fixation (222.73 ± 72.40 N) groups (P = .118), both were significantly less than that of the native meniscus (405.46 ± 95.62) (P < .001). Interference fixation displayed cyclic elongation (1.04 ± 0.71 mm) and stiffness (69.10 ± 25.8 N/mm) that were not significantly different from the native meniscus tissue (0.78 ± 0.53 mm and 83.1 ±26.28 N/mm) (P = .359 and P = .224), in comparison to transosseous suture fixation, which did show increased cyclic elongation (1.85 ± 1.44 mm) (P = .047) and decreased stiffness (34.72 ± 10.2 N/mm) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Interference fixation of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus has superior cyclic elongation and stiffness when compared to transosseous suture fixation. Interference fixation and the native meniscus model have a similar stiffness and cyclic elongation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The significance of our study is that using interference fixation for meniscal allograft transplantation has the potential to reduce short term surgical failures as well as long term complication rates. Elsevier 2022-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9210386/ /pubmed/35747667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.01.001 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Brzezinski, Andrzej Imbergamo, Casey Pfaff, William Tarapore, Rae Nasra, Matthew Simon, Michael Gatt, Charles Biomechanical Comparison of Meniscal Allograft Root Fixation Techniques: Anterograde Interference Bone Plug Fixation Yields Favorable Results Compared to Transosseous Suture Fixation Alone |
title | Biomechanical Comparison of Meniscal Allograft Root Fixation Techniques: Anterograde Interference Bone Plug Fixation Yields Favorable Results Compared to Transosseous Suture Fixation Alone |
title_full | Biomechanical Comparison of Meniscal Allograft Root Fixation Techniques: Anterograde Interference Bone Plug Fixation Yields Favorable Results Compared to Transosseous Suture Fixation Alone |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical Comparison of Meniscal Allograft Root Fixation Techniques: Anterograde Interference Bone Plug Fixation Yields Favorable Results Compared to Transosseous Suture Fixation Alone |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical Comparison of Meniscal Allograft Root Fixation Techniques: Anterograde Interference Bone Plug Fixation Yields Favorable Results Compared to Transosseous Suture Fixation Alone |
title_short | Biomechanical Comparison of Meniscal Allograft Root Fixation Techniques: Anterograde Interference Bone Plug Fixation Yields Favorable Results Compared to Transosseous Suture Fixation Alone |
title_sort | biomechanical comparison of meniscal allograft root fixation techniques: anterograde interference bone plug fixation yields favorable results compared to transosseous suture fixation alone |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.01.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brzezinskiandrzej biomechanicalcomparisonofmeniscalallograftrootfixationtechniquesanterogradeinterferenceboneplugfixationyieldsfavorableresultscomparedtotransosseoussuturefixationalone AT imbergamocasey biomechanicalcomparisonofmeniscalallograftrootfixationtechniquesanterogradeinterferenceboneplugfixationyieldsfavorableresultscomparedtotransosseoussuturefixationalone AT pfaffwilliam biomechanicalcomparisonofmeniscalallograftrootfixationtechniquesanterogradeinterferenceboneplugfixationyieldsfavorableresultscomparedtotransosseoussuturefixationalone AT taraporerae biomechanicalcomparisonofmeniscalallograftrootfixationtechniquesanterogradeinterferenceboneplugfixationyieldsfavorableresultscomparedtotransosseoussuturefixationalone AT nasramatthew biomechanicalcomparisonofmeniscalallograftrootfixationtechniquesanterogradeinterferenceboneplugfixationyieldsfavorableresultscomparedtotransosseoussuturefixationalone AT simonmichael biomechanicalcomparisonofmeniscalallograftrootfixationtechniquesanterogradeinterferenceboneplugfixationyieldsfavorableresultscomparedtotransosseoussuturefixationalone AT gattcharles biomechanicalcomparisonofmeniscalallograftrootfixationtechniquesanterogradeinterferenceboneplugfixationyieldsfavorableresultscomparedtotransosseoussuturefixationalone |