Cargando…

Biomechanical Comparison of Meniscal Allograft Root Fixation Techniques: Anterograde Interference Bone Plug Fixation Yields Favorable Results Compared to Transosseous Suture Fixation Alone

PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanical properties of 2 different fixation techniques (interference bone plug fixation vs transosseous suture fixation) of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus using a porcine model. METHODS: Twenty-six matched pairs of fresh-frozen juvenile domestic porcine knees...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brzezinski, Andrzej, Imbergamo, Casey, Pfaff, William, Tarapore, Rae, Nasra, Matthew, Simon, Michael, Gatt, Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.01.001
_version_ 1784730157940998144
author Brzezinski, Andrzej
Imbergamo, Casey
Pfaff, William
Tarapore, Rae
Nasra, Matthew
Simon, Michael
Gatt, Charles
author_facet Brzezinski, Andrzej
Imbergamo, Casey
Pfaff, William
Tarapore, Rae
Nasra, Matthew
Simon, Michael
Gatt, Charles
author_sort Brzezinski, Andrzej
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanical properties of 2 different fixation techniques (interference bone plug fixation vs transosseous suture fixation) of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus using a porcine model. METHODS: Twenty-six matched pairs of fresh-frozen juvenile domestic porcine knees were used in this study. Specimens were randomly distributed among 3 groups: (1) native meniscus groups, (2) interference fixation, and (3) transosseous suture fixation. In each group, the posterior segments of the tested medial menisci were gripped with the freeze clamps and fixed to the tensile testing machine. Samples were preconditioned, followed by cyclic tension-relaxation for 1000 cycles between 10 and 30 N at 0.5 Hz and finally pulled to failure at a rate of 0.55 mm/s. The cyclic elongation, stiffness to failure, mode, and ultimate load to failure were recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in ultimate load to failure between the interference fixation (169.71 ± 71.98 N) and transosseous suture fixation (222.73 ± 72.40 N) groups (P = .118), both were significantly less than that of the native meniscus (405.46 ± 95.62) (P < .001). Interference fixation displayed cyclic elongation (1.04 ± 0.71 mm) and stiffness (69.10 ± 25.8 N/mm) that were not significantly different from the native meniscus tissue (0.78 ± 0.53 mm and 83.1 ±26.28 N/mm) (P = .359 and P = .224), in comparison to transosseous suture fixation, which did show increased cyclic elongation (1.85 ± 1.44 mm) (P = .047) and decreased stiffness (34.72 ± 10.2 N/mm) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Interference fixation of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus has superior cyclic elongation and stiffness when compared to transosseous suture fixation. Interference fixation and the native meniscus model have a similar stiffness and cyclic elongation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The significance of our study is that using interference fixation for meniscal allograft transplantation has the potential to reduce short term surgical failures as well as long term complication rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9210386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92103862022-06-22 Biomechanical Comparison of Meniscal Allograft Root Fixation Techniques: Anterograde Interference Bone Plug Fixation Yields Favorable Results Compared to Transosseous Suture Fixation Alone Brzezinski, Andrzej Imbergamo, Casey Pfaff, William Tarapore, Rae Nasra, Matthew Simon, Michael Gatt, Charles Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanical properties of 2 different fixation techniques (interference bone plug fixation vs transosseous suture fixation) of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus using a porcine model. METHODS: Twenty-six matched pairs of fresh-frozen juvenile domestic porcine knees were used in this study. Specimens were randomly distributed among 3 groups: (1) native meniscus groups, (2) interference fixation, and (3) transosseous suture fixation. In each group, the posterior segments of the tested medial menisci were gripped with the freeze clamps and fixed to the tensile testing machine. Samples were preconditioned, followed by cyclic tension-relaxation for 1000 cycles between 10 and 30 N at 0.5 Hz and finally pulled to failure at a rate of 0.55 mm/s. The cyclic elongation, stiffness to failure, mode, and ultimate load to failure were recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in ultimate load to failure between the interference fixation (169.71 ± 71.98 N) and transosseous suture fixation (222.73 ± 72.40 N) groups (P = .118), both were significantly less than that of the native meniscus (405.46 ± 95.62) (P < .001). Interference fixation displayed cyclic elongation (1.04 ± 0.71 mm) and stiffness (69.10 ± 25.8 N/mm) that were not significantly different from the native meniscus tissue (0.78 ± 0.53 mm and 83.1 ±26.28 N/mm) (P = .359 and P = .224), in comparison to transosseous suture fixation, which did show increased cyclic elongation (1.85 ± 1.44 mm) (P = .047) and decreased stiffness (34.72 ± 10.2 N/mm) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Interference fixation of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus has superior cyclic elongation and stiffness when compared to transosseous suture fixation. Interference fixation and the native meniscus model have a similar stiffness and cyclic elongation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The significance of our study is that using interference fixation for meniscal allograft transplantation has the potential to reduce short term surgical failures as well as long term complication rates. Elsevier 2022-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9210386/ /pubmed/35747667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.01.001 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Brzezinski, Andrzej
Imbergamo, Casey
Pfaff, William
Tarapore, Rae
Nasra, Matthew
Simon, Michael
Gatt, Charles
Biomechanical Comparison of Meniscal Allograft Root Fixation Techniques: Anterograde Interference Bone Plug Fixation Yields Favorable Results Compared to Transosseous Suture Fixation Alone
title Biomechanical Comparison of Meniscal Allograft Root Fixation Techniques: Anterograde Interference Bone Plug Fixation Yields Favorable Results Compared to Transosseous Suture Fixation Alone
title_full Biomechanical Comparison of Meniscal Allograft Root Fixation Techniques: Anterograde Interference Bone Plug Fixation Yields Favorable Results Compared to Transosseous Suture Fixation Alone
title_fullStr Biomechanical Comparison of Meniscal Allograft Root Fixation Techniques: Anterograde Interference Bone Plug Fixation Yields Favorable Results Compared to Transosseous Suture Fixation Alone
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Comparison of Meniscal Allograft Root Fixation Techniques: Anterograde Interference Bone Plug Fixation Yields Favorable Results Compared to Transosseous Suture Fixation Alone
title_short Biomechanical Comparison of Meniscal Allograft Root Fixation Techniques: Anterograde Interference Bone Plug Fixation Yields Favorable Results Compared to Transosseous Suture Fixation Alone
title_sort biomechanical comparison of meniscal allograft root fixation techniques: anterograde interference bone plug fixation yields favorable results compared to transosseous suture fixation alone
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.01.001
work_keys_str_mv AT brzezinskiandrzej biomechanicalcomparisonofmeniscalallograftrootfixationtechniquesanterogradeinterferenceboneplugfixationyieldsfavorableresultscomparedtotransosseoussuturefixationalone
AT imbergamocasey biomechanicalcomparisonofmeniscalallograftrootfixationtechniquesanterogradeinterferenceboneplugfixationyieldsfavorableresultscomparedtotransosseoussuturefixationalone
AT pfaffwilliam biomechanicalcomparisonofmeniscalallograftrootfixationtechniquesanterogradeinterferenceboneplugfixationyieldsfavorableresultscomparedtotransosseoussuturefixationalone
AT taraporerae biomechanicalcomparisonofmeniscalallograftrootfixationtechniquesanterogradeinterferenceboneplugfixationyieldsfavorableresultscomparedtotransosseoussuturefixationalone
AT nasramatthew biomechanicalcomparisonofmeniscalallograftrootfixationtechniquesanterogradeinterferenceboneplugfixationyieldsfavorableresultscomparedtotransosseoussuturefixationalone
AT simonmichael biomechanicalcomparisonofmeniscalallograftrootfixationtechniquesanterogradeinterferenceboneplugfixationyieldsfavorableresultscomparedtotransosseoussuturefixationalone
AT gattcharles biomechanicalcomparisonofmeniscalallograftrootfixationtechniquesanterogradeinterferenceboneplugfixationyieldsfavorableresultscomparedtotransosseoussuturefixationalone