Cargando…

Peking Prognostic Score, Based on Preoperative Sarcopenia Status, Is a Novel Prognostic Factor in Patients With Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND: This study focused on assessing the role of the Peking prognostic score (PPS), a novel prognostic index based on muscle atrophy and lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio, within gastric cancer patient prognosis. METHODS: We analyzed the data collected from 774 gastric cancer cases betwe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiong, Jianping, Hu, Haitao, Kang, Wenzhe, Li, Yang, Jin, Peng, Shao, Xinxin, Li, Weikun, Tian, Yantao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747263
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.910271
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: This study focused on assessing the role of the Peking prognostic score (PPS), a novel prognostic index based on muscle atrophy and lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio, within gastric cancer patient prognosis. METHODS: We analyzed the data collected from 774 gastric cancer cases between April 2011 and February 2016 (discovery cohort). The results were assessed in 575 gastric cancer cases from March 2016 to September 2019 (validation cohort). For evaluating skeletal muscle mass, we obtained computed tomography images at the third lumbar vertebra level (L3). We performed a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (t-ROC) to analyze PPS’s prognostic significance with others. RESULTS: The discovery cohort enrolled altogether 774 patients with non-metastatic gastric cancer, including 639 (82.5%) men along with 135 (17.5%) women. The patients were divided into 3 groups; 166 patients (21.4%) were assigned into group 0, 472 (60.9%) in group 1, and 136 (17.7%) in group 2, respectively. An increased PPS was in direct proportion to an elder age, reduced body mass index, higher Pathological Tumor Lymph Node Metastasis stage, perineural invasion, and vascular invasion. We identified PPS to independently estimate patient overall survival (OS) together with disease-free survival (DFS; both P < 0.001). Additionally, as revealed by t-ROC analysis, PPS exhibited the highest sensitivity compared with other prognostic scoring systems in predicting patient survival. Finally, we evaluated the prognostic value of PPS in the validation cohort and confirmed that preoperative PPS independently estimates patient OS and DFS. CONCLUSION: The PPS accounts for an efficient nutrition-inflammation prognostic scoring system in gastric cancer patients.