Cargando…

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with 4-Strand Hamstring Tendon Construct May be Biomechanically Superior to 5-Strand Hamstring Tendon Construct When Using Femoral Suspensory Fixation

PURPOSE: To compare stiffness, strain, and load to failure of 4- versus 5-strand hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction human tendon allografts with femoral suspensory and tibial interference screw fixation METHODS: Allograft hamstring tendons were used to create 10 four-strand (4S) and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hagen, Mia S., Sorey, Woody, Kahsai, Ermyas, Telfer, Scott, Chin, Kenneth, Kweon, Christopher Y., Gee, Albert O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.03.008
_version_ 1784730166343237632
author Hagen, Mia S.
Sorey, Woody
Kahsai, Ermyas
Telfer, Scott
Chin, Kenneth
Kweon, Christopher Y.
Gee, Albert O.
author_facet Hagen, Mia S.
Sorey, Woody
Kahsai, Ermyas
Telfer, Scott
Chin, Kenneth
Kweon, Christopher Y.
Gee, Albert O.
author_sort Hagen, Mia S.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare stiffness, strain, and load to failure of 4- versus 5-strand hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction human tendon allografts with femoral suspensory and tibial interference screw fixation METHODS: Allograft hamstring tendons were used to create 10 four-strand (4S) and 10 five-strand (5S) grafts. Grafts were fixed to a uniaxial electromechanical load system via a femoral cortical suspensory button and a bioabsorbable interference screw in bone analogue. Grafts were cycled from 100 Newtons (N) to 250 N for 1,000 repetitions at 0.5 hertz before load to failure testing. Cyclic displacement was defined as the difference in graft length from the first 20 to 30 cycles compared with the last 10 cycles. Trials were recorded on a high-definition camera to allow for digital image correlation analysis. RESULTS: Cyclic displacement more than 1,000 cycles was significantly lower in the 4S compared with the 5S group (0.87 vs 1.11 mm, P = .037). Digital image correlation analysis confirmed that the fifth strand elongated more than the other 4 strands in the 5S constructs (6.1% vs 3.9%, P = .032). Load to failure was greater in the 4S compared with the 5S group but not statistically significant (762 vs 707 N, P = .35). Stiffness was similar between constructs (138.5 vs 138.3 N/mm, P = .96) CONCLUSIONS: Compared with cyclically loaded 4S hamstring grafts, the 5S grafts had significantly increased displacement over time in a model of femoral suspensory and tibial interference screw fixation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft is a commonly performed surgery with excellent outcomes. It has been shown that graft diameter influences these outcomes. As surgeons use larger grafts, it is important to investigate how these constructs may affect the outcomes of surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9210479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92104792022-06-22 Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with 4-Strand Hamstring Tendon Construct May be Biomechanically Superior to 5-Strand Hamstring Tendon Construct When Using Femoral Suspensory Fixation Hagen, Mia S. Sorey, Woody Kahsai, Ermyas Telfer, Scott Chin, Kenneth Kweon, Christopher Y. Gee, Albert O. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Original Article PURPOSE: To compare stiffness, strain, and load to failure of 4- versus 5-strand hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction human tendon allografts with femoral suspensory and tibial interference screw fixation METHODS: Allograft hamstring tendons were used to create 10 four-strand (4S) and 10 five-strand (5S) grafts. Grafts were fixed to a uniaxial electromechanical load system via a femoral cortical suspensory button and a bioabsorbable interference screw in bone analogue. Grafts were cycled from 100 Newtons (N) to 250 N for 1,000 repetitions at 0.5 hertz before load to failure testing. Cyclic displacement was defined as the difference in graft length from the first 20 to 30 cycles compared with the last 10 cycles. Trials were recorded on a high-definition camera to allow for digital image correlation analysis. RESULTS: Cyclic displacement more than 1,000 cycles was significantly lower in the 4S compared with the 5S group (0.87 vs 1.11 mm, P = .037). Digital image correlation analysis confirmed that the fifth strand elongated more than the other 4 strands in the 5S constructs (6.1% vs 3.9%, P = .032). Load to failure was greater in the 4S compared with the 5S group but not statistically significant (762 vs 707 N, P = .35). Stiffness was similar between constructs (138.5 vs 138.3 N/mm, P = .96) CONCLUSIONS: Compared with cyclically loaded 4S hamstring grafts, the 5S grafts had significantly increased displacement over time in a model of femoral suspensory and tibial interference screw fixation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft is a commonly performed surgery with excellent outcomes. It has been shown that graft diameter influences these outcomes. As surgeons use larger grafts, it is important to investigate how these constructs may affect the outcomes of surgery. Elsevier 2022-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9210479/ /pubmed/35747627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.03.008 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Hagen, Mia S.
Sorey, Woody
Kahsai, Ermyas
Telfer, Scott
Chin, Kenneth
Kweon, Christopher Y.
Gee, Albert O.
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with 4-Strand Hamstring Tendon Construct May be Biomechanically Superior to 5-Strand Hamstring Tendon Construct When Using Femoral Suspensory Fixation
title Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with 4-Strand Hamstring Tendon Construct May be Biomechanically Superior to 5-Strand Hamstring Tendon Construct When Using Femoral Suspensory Fixation
title_full Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with 4-Strand Hamstring Tendon Construct May be Biomechanically Superior to 5-Strand Hamstring Tendon Construct When Using Femoral Suspensory Fixation
title_fullStr Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with 4-Strand Hamstring Tendon Construct May be Biomechanically Superior to 5-Strand Hamstring Tendon Construct When Using Femoral Suspensory Fixation
title_full_unstemmed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with 4-Strand Hamstring Tendon Construct May be Biomechanically Superior to 5-Strand Hamstring Tendon Construct When Using Femoral Suspensory Fixation
title_short Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with 4-Strand Hamstring Tendon Construct May be Biomechanically Superior to 5-Strand Hamstring Tendon Construct When Using Femoral Suspensory Fixation
title_sort anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 4-strand hamstring tendon construct may be biomechanically superior to 5-strand hamstring tendon construct when using femoral suspensory fixation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.03.008
work_keys_str_mv AT hagenmias anteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwith4strandhamstringtendonconstructmaybebiomechanicallysuperiorto5strandhamstringtendonconstructwhenusingfemoralsuspensoryfixation
AT soreywoody anteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwith4strandhamstringtendonconstructmaybebiomechanicallysuperiorto5strandhamstringtendonconstructwhenusingfemoralsuspensoryfixation
AT kahsaiermyas anteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwith4strandhamstringtendonconstructmaybebiomechanicallysuperiorto5strandhamstringtendonconstructwhenusingfemoralsuspensoryfixation
AT telferscott anteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwith4strandhamstringtendonconstructmaybebiomechanicallysuperiorto5strandhamstringtendonconstructwhenusingfemoralsuspensoryfixation
AT chinkenneth anteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwith4strandhamstringtendonconstructmaybebiomechanicallysuperiorto5strandhamstringtendonconstructwhenusingfemoralsuspensoryfixation
AT kweonchristophery anteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwith4strandhamstringtendonconstructmaybebiomechanicallysuperiorto5strandhamstringtendonconstructwhenusingfemoralsuspensoryfixation
AT geealberto anteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwith4strandhamstringtendonconstructmaybebiomechanicallysuperiorto5strandhamstringtendonconstructwhenusingfemoralsuspensoryfixation