Cargando…

Utilisation of government-subsidised chronic disease management plans and cardiovascular care in Australian general practices

BACKGROUND: Government-subsidised general practice management plans (GPMPs) facilitate chronic disease management; however, impact on cardiovascular disease (CVD) is unknown. We aimed to determine utilisation and impact of GPMPs for people with or at elevated risk of CVD. METHODS: Secondary analysis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coorey, Genevieve, Campain, Anna, Mulley, John, Usherwood, Tim, Redfern, Julie, Harris, Mark, Zwar, Nicholas, Parker, Sharon, Coiera, Enrico, Peiris, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35729493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01763-2
_version_ 1784730216674885632
author Coorey, Genevieve
Campain, Anna
Mulley, John
Usherwood, Tim
Redfern, Julie
Harris, Mark
Zwar, Nicholas
Parker, Sharon
Coiera, Enrico
Peiris, David
author_facet Coorey, Genevieve
Campain, Anna
Mulley, John
Usherwood, Tim
Redfern, Julie
Harris, Mark
Zwar, Nicholas
Parker, Sharon
Coiera, Enrico
Peiris, David
author_sort Coorey, Genevieve
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Government-subsidised general practice management plans (GPMPs) facilitate chronic disease management; however, impact on cardiovascular disease (CVD) is unknown. We aimed to determine utilisation and impact of GPMPs for people with or at elevated risk of CVD. METHODS: Secondary analysis of baseline data from the CONNECT randomised controlled trial linked to Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) claims. Multivariate regression examining the association of GPMP receipt and review with: (1) ≥ 1 MBS-subsidised allied health visit in the previous 24 months; (2) adherence to dual cardioprotective medication (≥ 80% of days covered with a dispensed PBS prescription); and (3) meeting recommended LDL-cholesterol and blood pressure (BP) targets concurrently. RESULTS: Overall, 905 trial participants from 24 primary health care services consented to data linkage. Participants with a GPMP (46.6%, 422/905) were older (69.4 vs 66.0 years), had lower education (32.3% vs 24.7% high school or lower), lower household income (27.5% vs 17.0% in lowest bracket), and more comorbidities, particularly diabetes (42.2% vs 17.6%) compared to those without a GPMP. After adjustment, a GPMP was strongly associated with allied health visits (odds ratio (OR) 14.80, 95% CI: 9.08–24.11) but not higher medication adherence rates (OR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.52–1.29) nor meeting combined LDL and BP targets (OR 1.31, 95% CI: 0.72–2.38). Minor differences in significant covariates were noted in models using GPMP review versus GPMP initiation. CONCLUSIONS: In people with or at elevated risk of CVD, GPMPs are under-utilised overall. They are targeting high-needs populations and facilitate allied health access, but are not associated with improved CVD risk management, which represents an opportunity for enhancing their value in supporting guideline-recommended care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01763-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9210726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92107262022-06-22 Utilisation of government-subsidised chronic disease management plans and cardiovascular care in Australian general practices Coorey, Genevieve Campain, Anna Mulley, John Usherwood, Tim Redfern, Julie Harris, Mark Zwar, Nicholas Parker, Sharon Coiera, Enrico Peiris, David BMC Prim Care Research BACKGROUND: Government-subsidised general practice management plans (GPMPs) facilitate chronic disease management; however, impact on cardiovascular disease (CVD) is unknown. We aimed to determine utilisation and impact of GPMPs for people with or at elevated risk of CVD. METHODS: Secondary analysis of baseline data from the CONNECT randomised controlled trial linked to Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) claims. Multivariate regression examining the association of GPMP receipt and review with: (1) ≥ 1 MBS-subsidised allied health visit in the previous 24 months; (2) adherence to dual cardioprotective medication (≥ 80% of days covered with a dispensed PBS prescription); and (3) meeting recommended LDL-cholesterol and blood pressure (BP) targets concurrently. RESULTS: Overall, 905 trial participants from 24 primary health care services consented to data linkage. Participants with a GPMP (46.6%, 422/905) were older (69.4 vs 66.0 years), had lower education (32.3% vs 24.7% high school or lower), lower household income (27.5% vs 17.0% in lowest bracket), and more comorbidities, particularly diabetes (42.2% vs 17.6%) compared to those without a GPMP. After adjustment, a GPMP was strongly associated with allied health visits (odds ratio (OR) 14.80, 95% CI: 9.08–24.11) but not higher medication adherence rates (OR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.52–1.29) nor meeting combined LDL and BP targets (OR 1.31, 95% CI: 0.72–2.38). Minor differences in significant covariates were noted in models using GPMP review versus GPMP initiation. CONCLUSIONS: In people with or at elevated risk of CVD, GPMPs are under-utilised overall. They are targeting high-needs populations and facilitate allied health access, but are not associated with improved CVD risk management, which represents an opportunity for enhancing their value in supporting guideline-recommended care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01763-2. BioMed Central 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9210726/ /pubmed/35729493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01763-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Coorey, Genevieve
Campain, Anna
Mulley, John
Usherwood, Tim
Redfern, Julie
Harris, Mark
Zwar, Nicholas
Parker, Sharon
Coiera, Enrico
Peiris, David
Utilisation of government-subsidised chronic disease management plans and cardiovascular care in Australian general practices
title Utilisation of government-subsidised chronic disease management plans and cardiovascular care in Australian general practices
title_full Utilisation of government-subsidised chronic disease management plans and cardiovascular care in Australian general practices
title_fullStr Utilisation of government-subsidised chronic disease management plans and cardiovascular care in Australian general practices
title_full_unstemmed Utilisation of government-subsidised chronic disease management plans and cardiovascular care in Australian general practices
title_short Utilisation of government-subsidised chronic disease management plans and cardiovascular care in Australian general practices
title_sort utilisation of government-subsidised chronic disease management plans and cardiovascular care in australian general practices
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35729493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01763-2
work_keys_str_mv AT cooreygenevieve utilisationofgovernmentsubsidisedchronicdiseasemanagementplansandcardiovascularcareinaustraliangeneralpractices
AT campainanna utilisationofgovernmentsubsidisedchronicdiseasemanagementplansandcardiovascularcareinaustraliangeneralpractices
AT mulleyjohn utilisationofgovernmentsubsidisedchronicdiseasemanagementplansandcardiovascularcareinaustraliangeneralpractices
AT usherwoodtim utilisationofgovernmentsubsidisedchronicdiseasemanagementplansandcardiovascularcareinaustraliangeneralpractices
AT redfernjulie utilisationofgovernmentsubsidisedchronicdiseasemanagementplansandcardiovascularcareinaustraliangeneralpractices
AT harrismark utilisationofgovernmentsubsidisedchronicdiseasemanagementplansandcardiovascularcareinaustraliangeneralpractices
AT zwarnicholas utilisationofgovernmentsubsidisedchronicdiseasemanagementplansandcardiovascularcareinaustraliangeneralpractices
AT parkersharon utilisationofgovernmentsubsidisedchronicdiseasemanagementplansandcardiovascularcareinaustraliangeneralpractices
AT coieraenrico utilisationofgovernmentsubsidisedchronicdiseasemanagementplansandcardiovascularcareinaustraliangeneralpractices
AT peirisdavid utilisationofgovernmentsubsidisedchronicdiseasemanagementplansandcardiovascularcareinaustraliangeneralpractices