Cargando…

A comparison of ImageJ and machine learning based image analysis methods to measure cassava bacterial blight disease severity

BACKGROUND: Methods to accurately quantify disease severity are fundamental to plant pathogen interaction studies. Commonly used methods include visual scoring of disease symptoms, tracking pathogen growth in planta over time, and various assays that detect plant defense responses. Several image-bas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elliott, Kiona, Berry, Jeffrey C., Kim, Hobin, Bart, Rebecca S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35729628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-022-00906-x
_version_ 1784730233812811776
author Elliott, Kiona
Berry, Jeffrey C.
Kim, Hobin
Bart, Rebecca S.
author_facet Elliott, Kiona
Berry, Jeffrey C.
Kim, Hobin
Bart, Rebecca S.
author_sort Elliott, Kiona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Methods to accurately quantify disease severity are fundamental to plant pathogen interaction studies. Commonly used methods include visual scoring of disease symptoms, tracking pathogen growth in planta over time, and various assays that detect plant defense responses. Several image-based methods for phenotyping of plant disease symptoms have also been developed. Each of these methods has different advantages and limitations which should be carefully considered when choosing an approach and interpreting the results. RESULTS: In this paper, we developed two image analysis methods and tested their ability to quantify different aspects of disease lesions in the cassava-Xanthomonas pathosystem. The first method uses ImageJ, an open-source platform widely used in the biological sciences. The second method is a few-shot support vector machine learning tool that uses a classifier file trained with five representative infected leaf images for lesion recognition. Cassava leaves were syringe infiltrated with wildtype Xanthomonas, a Xanthomonas mutant with decreased virulence, and mock treatments. Digital images of infected leaves were captured overtime using a Raspberry Pi camera. The image analysis methods were analyzed and compared for the ability to segment the lesion from the background and accurately capture and measure differences between the treatment types. CONCLUSIONS: Both image analysis methods presented in this paper allow for accurate segmentation of disease lesions from the non-infected plant. Specifically, at 4-, 6-, and 9-days post inoculation (DPI), both methods provided quantitative differences in disease symptoms between different treatment types. Thus, either method could be applied to extract information about disease severity. Strengths and weaknesses of each approach are discussed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13007-022-00906-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9210806
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92108062022-06-22 A comparison of ImageJ and machine learning based image analysis methods to measure cassava bacterial blight disease severity Elliott, Kiona Berry, Jeffrey C. Kim, Hobin Bart, Rebecca S. Plant Methods Methodology BACKGROUND: Methods to accurately quantify disease severity are fundamental to plant pathogen interaction studies. Commonly used methods include visual scoring of disease symptoms, tracking pathogen growth in planta over time, and various assays that detect plant defense responses. Several image-based methods for phenotyping of plant disease symptoms have also been developed. Each of these methods has different advantages and limitations which should be carefully considered when choosing an approach and interpreting the results. RESULTS: In this paper, we developed two image analysis methods and tested their ability to quantify different aspects of disease lesions in the cassava-Xanthomonas pathosystem. The first method uses ImageJ, an open-source platform widely used in the biological sciences. The second method is a few-shot support vector machine learning tool that uses a classifier file trained with five representative infected leaf images for lesion recognition. Cassava leaves were syringe infiltrated with wildtype Xanthomonas, a Xanthomonas mutant with decreased virulence, and mock treatments. Digital images of infected leaves were captured overtime using a Raspberry Pi camera. The image analysis methods were analyzed and compared for the ability to segment the lesion from the background and accurately capture and measure differences between the treatment types. CONCLUSIONS: Both image analysis methods presented in this paper allow for accurate segmentation of disease lesions from the non-infected plant. Specifically, at 4-, 6-, and 9-days post inoculation (DPI), both methods provided quantitative differences in disease symptoms between different treatment types. Thus, either method could be applied to extract information about disease severity. Strengths and weaknesses of each approach are discussed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13007-022-00906-x. BioMed Central 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9210806/ /pubmed/35729628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-022-00906-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology
Elliott, Kiona
Berry, Jeffrey C.
Kim, Hobin
Bart, Rebecca S.
A comparison of ImageJ and machine learning based image analysis methods to measure cassava bacterial blight disease severity
title A comparison of ImageJ and machine learning based image analysis methods to measure cassava bacterial blight disease severity
title_full A comparison of ImageJ and machine learning based image analysis methods to measure cassava bacterial blight disease severity
title_fullStr A comparison of ImageJ and machine learning based image analysis methods to measure cassava bacterial blight disease severity
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of ImageJ and machine learning based image analysis methods to measure cassava bacterial blight disease severity
title_short A comparison of ImageJ and machine learning based image analysis methods to measure cassava bacterial blight disease severity
title_sort comparison of imagej and machine learning based image analysis methods to measure cassava bacterial blight disease severity
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35729628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-022-00906-x
work_keys_str_mv AT elliottkiona acomparisonofimagejandmachinelearningbasedimageanalysismethodstomeasurecassavabacterialblightdiseaseseverity
AT berryjeffreyc acomparisonofimagejandmachinelearningbasedimageanalysismethodstomeasurecassavabacterialblightdiseaseseverity
AT kimhobin acomparisonofimagejandmachinelearningbasedimageanalysismethodstomeasurecassavabacterialblightdiseaseseverity
AT bartrebeccas acomparisonofimagejandmachinelearningbasedimageanalysismethodstomeasurecassavabacterialblightdiseaseseverity
AT elliottkiona comparisonofimagejandmachinelearningbasedimageanalysismethodstomeasurecassavabacterialblightdiseaseseverity
AT berryjeffreyc comparisonofimagejandmachinelearningbasedimageanalysismethodstomeasurecassavabacterialblightdiseaseseverity
AT kimhobin comparisonofimagejandmachinelearningbasedimageanalysismethodstomeasurecassavabacterialblightdiseaseseverity
AT bartrebeccas comparisonofimagejandmachinelearningbasedimageanalysismethodstomeasurecassavabacterialblightdiseaseseverity