Cargando…

Sparus aurata and Lates calcarifer skin microbiota under healthy and diseased conditions in UV and non-UV treated water

BACKGROUND: The welfare of farmed fish is influenced by numerous environmental and management factors. Fish skin is an important site for immunity and a major route by which infections are acquired. The objective of this study was to characterize bacterial composition variability on skin of healthy,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Ashhab, Ashraf, Alexander-Shani, Rivka, Avrahami, Yosef, Ehrlich, Roberto, Strem, Rosa Ines, Meshner, Shiri, Shental, Noam, Sharon, Galit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35729615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42523-022-00191-y
_version_ 1784730235316469760
author Al-Ashhab, Ashraf
Alexander-Shani, Rivka
Avrahami, Yosef
Ehrlich, Roberto
Strem, Rosa Ines
Meshner, Shiri
Shental, Noam
Sharon, Galit
author_facet Al-Ashhab, Ashraf
Alexander-Shani, Rivka
Avrahami, Yosef
Ehrlich, Roberto
Strem, Rosa Ines
Meshner, Shiri
Shental, Noam
Sharon, Galit
author_sort Al-Ashhab, Ashraf
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The welfare of farmed fish is influenced by numerous environmental and management factors. Fish skin is an important site for immunity and a major route by which infections are acquired. The objective of this study was to characterize bacterial composition variability on skin of healthy, diseased, and recovered Gilthead Seabream (Sparus aurata) and Barramundi (Lates calcarifer). S. aurata, which are highly sensitive to gram-negative bacteria, were challenged with Vibrio harveyi. In addition, and to provide a wider range of infections, both fish species (S. aurata and L. calcarifer) were infected with gram-positive Streptococcus iniae, to compare the response of the highly sensitive L. calcarifer to that of the more resistant S. aurata. All experiments also compared microbial communities found on skin of fish reared in UV (a general practice used in aquaculture) and non-UV treated water tanks. RESULTS: Skin swab samples were taken from different areas of the fish (lateral lines, abdomen and gills) prior to controlled infection, and 24, 48 and 72 h, 5 days, one week and one-month post-infection. Fish skin microbial communities were determined using Illumina iSeq100 16S rDNA for bacterial sequencing. The results showed that naturally present bacterial composition is similar on all sampled fish skin sites prior to infection, but the controlled infections (T(1) 24 h post infection) altered the bacterial communities found on fish skin. Moreover, when the naturally occurring skin microbiota did not quickly recover, fish mortality was common following T(1) (24 h post infection). We further confirmed the differences in bacterial communities found on skin and in the water of fish reared in non-UV and UV treated water under healthy and diseased conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Our experimental findings shed light on the fish skin microbiota in relation to fish survival (in diseased and healthy conditions). The results can be harnessed to provide management tools for commercial fish farmers; predicting and preventing fish diseases can increase fish health, welfare, and enhance commercial fish yields. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42523-022-00191-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9210813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92108132022-06-22 Sparus aurata and Lates calcarifer skin microbiota under healthy and diseased conditions in UV and non-UV treated water Al-Ashhab, Ashraf Alexander-Shani, Rivka Avrahami, Yosef Ehrlich, Roberto Strem, Rosa Ines Meshner, Shiri Shental, Noam Sharon, Galit Anim Microbiome Research BACKGROUND: The welfare of farmed fish is influenced by numerous environmental and management factors. Fish skin is an important site for immunity and a major route by which infections are acquired. The objective of this study was to characterize bacterial composition variability on skin of healthy, diseased, and recovered Gilthead Seabream (Sparus aurata) and Barramundi (Lates calcarifer). S. aurata, which are highly sensitive to gram-negative bacteria, were challenged with Vibrio harveyi. In addition, and to provide a wider range of infections, both fish species (S. aurata and L. calcarifer) were infected with gram-positive Streptococcus iniae, to compare the response of the highly sensitive L. calcarifer to that of the more resistant S. aurata. All experiments also compared microbial communities found on skin of fish reared in UV (a general practice used in aquaculture) and non-UV treated water tanks. RESULTS: Skin swab samples were taken from different areas of the fish (lateral lines, abdomen and gills) prior to controlled infection, and 24, 48 and 72 h, 5 days, one week and one-month post-infection. Fish skin microbial communities were determined using Illumina iSeq100 16S rDNA for bacterial sequencing. The results showed that naturally present bacterial composition is similar on all sampled fish skin sites prior to infection, but the controlled infections (T(1) 24 h post infection) altered the bacterial communities found on fish skin. Moreover, when the naturally occurring skin microbiota did not quickly recover, fish mortality was common following T(1) (24 h post infection). We further confirmed the differences in bacterial communities found on skin and in the water of fish reared in non-UV and UV treated water under healthy and diseased conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Our experimental findings shed light on the fish skin microbiota in relation to fish survival (in diseased and healthy conditions). The results can be harnessed to provide management tools for commercial fish farmers; predicting and preventing fish diseases can increase fish health, welfare, and enhance commercial fish yields. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42523-022-00191-y. BioMed Central 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9210813/ /pubmed/35729615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42523-022-00191-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Al-Ashhab, Ashraf
Alexander-Shani, Rivka
Avrahami, Yosef
Ehrlich, Roberto
Strem, Rosa Ines
Meshner, Shiri
Shental, Noam
Sharon, Galit
Sparus aurata and Lates calcarifer skin microbiota under healthy and diseased conditions in UV and non-UV treated water
title Sparus aurata and Lates calcarifer skin microbiota under healthy and diseased conditions in UV and non-UV treated water
title_full Sparus aurata and Lates calcarifer skin microbiota under healthy and diseased conditions in UV and non-UV treated water
title_fullStr Sparus aurata and Lates calcarifer skin microbiota under healthy and diseased conditions in UV and non-UV treated water
title_full_unstemmed Sparus aurata and Lates calcarifer skin microbiota under healthy and diseased conditions in UV and non-UV treated water
title_short Sparus aurata and Lates calcarifer skin microbiota under healthy and diseased conditions in UV and non-UV treated water
title_sort sparus aurata and lates calcarifer skin microbiota under healthy and diseased conditions in uv and non-uv treated water
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35729615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42523-022-00191-y
work_keys_str_mv AT alashhabashraf sparusaurataandlatescalcariferskinmicrobiotaunderhealthyanddiseasedconditionsinuvandnonuvtreatedwater
AT alexandershanirivka sparusaurataandlatescalcariferskinmicrobiotaunderhealthyanddiseasedconditionsinuvandnonuvtreatedwater
AT avrahamiyosef sparusaurataandlatescalcariferskinmicrobiotaunderhealthyanddiseasedconditionsinuvandnonuvtreatedwater
AT ehrlichroberto sparusaurataandlatescalcariferskinmicrobiotaunderhealthyanddiseasedconditionsinuvandnonuvtreatedwater
AT stremrosaines sparusaurataandlatescalcariferskinmicrobiotaunderhealthyanddiseasedconditionsinuvandnonuvtreatedwater
AT meshnershiri sparusaurataandlatescalcariferskinmicrobiotaunderhealthyanddiseasedconditionsinuvandnonuvtreatedwater
AT shentalnoam sparusaurataandlatescalcariferskinmicrobiotaunderhealthyanddiseasedconditionsinuvandnonuvtreatedwater
AT sharongalit sparusaurataandlatescalcariferskinmicrobiotaunderhealthyanddiseasedconditionsinuvandnonuvtreatedwater