Cargando…
Sex Differences in Responses to Antidepressant Augmentations in Treatment-Resistant Depression
BACKGROUND: Women are nearly twice as likely as men to suffer from major depressive disorder. Yet, there is a dearth of studies comparing the clinical outcomes of women and men with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) treated with similar augmentation strategies. We aimed to evaluate the effects of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9211005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35167671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyac017 |
_version_ | 1784730271298355200 |
---|---|
author | Moderie, Christophe Nuñez, Nicolas Fielding, Allan Comai, Stefano Gobbi, Gabriella |
author_facet | Moderie, Christophe Nuñez, Nicolas Fielding, Allan Comai, Stefano Gobbi, Gabriella |
author_sort | Moderie, Christophe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Women are nearly twice as likely as men to suffer from major depressive disorder. Yet, there is a dearth of studies comparing the clinical outcomes of women and men with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) treated with similar augmentation strategies. We aimed to evaluate the effects of the augmentation strategies in women and men at the McGill University Health Center. METHODS: We reviewed health records of 76 patients (42 women, 34 men) with TRD, treated with augmentation strategies including antidepressants (AD) with mood stabilizers (AD+MS), antipsychotics (AD+AP), or in combination (AD+AP+MS). Clinical outcomes were determined by comparing changes on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-C16), and Clinical Global Impression rating scale (CGI-S) at the beginning and after 3 months of an unchanged treatment. Changes in individual items of the HAMD-17 were also compared between the groups. RESULTS: Women and men improved from beginning to 3 months on all scales (P < .001, η (p)(2) ≥ 0.68). There was also a significant sex × time interaction for all scales (P < .05, η (p)(2) ≥ 0.06), reflecting a greater improvement in women compared with men. Specifically, women exhibited greater improvement in early (P = .03, η (p)(2 = )0.08) and middle-of-the-night insomnia (P = .01, η (p)(2 = )0.09) as well as psychomotor retardation (P < .001 η (p)(2 = )0.16) and psychic (P = .02, η (p)(2 = )0.07) and somatic anxiety (P = .01, η (p)(2 = )0.10). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of AD+AP/MS generates a significantly greater clinical response in women compared with men with TRD, supporting the existence of distinct pharmacological profiles between sexes in our sample. Moreover, they emphasize the benefit of augmentation strategies in women, underscoring the benefit of addressing symptoms such as insomnia and anxiety with AP and MS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9211005 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92110052022-06-22 Sex Differences in Responses to Antidepressant Augmentations in Treatment-Resistant Depression Moderie, Christophe Nuñez, Nicolas Fielding, Allan Comai, Stefano Gobbi, Gabriella Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Regular Research Articles BACKGROUND: Women are nearly twice as likely as men to suffer from major depressive disorder. Yet, there is a dearth of studies comparing the clinical outcomes of women and men with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) treated with similar augmentation strategies. We aimed to evaluate the effects of the augmentation strategies in women and men at the McGill University Health Center. METHODS: We reviewed health records of 76 patients (42 women, 34 men) with TRD, treated with augmentation strategies including antidepressants (AD) with mood stabilizers (AD+MS), antipsychotics (AD+AP), or in combination (AD+AP+MS). Clinical outcomes were determined by comparing changes on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-C16), and Clinical Global Impression rating scale (CGI-S) at the beginning and after 3 months of an unchanged treatment. Changes in individual items of the HAMD-17 were also compared between the groups. RESULTS: Women and men improved from beginning to 3 months on all scales (P < .001, η (p)(2) ≥ 0.68). There was also a significant sex × time interaction for all scales (P < .05, η (p)(2) ≥ 0.06), reflecting a greater improvement in women compared with men. Specifically, women exhibited greater improvement in early (P = .03, η (p)(2 = )0.08) and middle-of-the-night insomnia (P = .01, η (p)(2 = )0.09) as well as psychomotor retardation (P < .001 η (p)(2 = )0.16) and psychic (P = .02, η (p)(2 = )0.07) and somatic anxiety (P = .01, η (p)(2 = )0.10). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of AD+AP/MS generates a significantly greater clinical response in women compared with men with TRD, supporting the existence of distinct pharmacological profiles between sexes in our sample. Moreover, they emphasize the benefit of augmentation strategies in women, underscoring the benefit of addressing symptoms such as insomnia and anxiety with AP and MS. Oxford University Press 2022-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9211005/ /pubmed/35167671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyac017 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CINP. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Regular Research Articles Moderie, Christophe Nuñez, Nicolas Fielding, Allan Comai, Stefano Gobbi, Gabriella Sex Differences in Responses to Antidepressant Augmentations in Treatment-Resistant Depression |
title | Sex Differences in Responses to Antidepressant Augmentations in Treatment-Resistant Depression |
title_full | Sex Differences in Responses to Antidepressant Augmentations in Treatment-Resistant Depression |
title_fullStr | Sex Differences in Responses to Antidepressant Augmentations in Treatment-Resistant Depression |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex Differences in Responses to Antidepressant Augmentations in Treatment-Resistant Depression |
title_short | Sex Differences in Responses to Antidepressant Augmentations in Treatment-Resistant Depression |
title_sort | sex differences in responses to antidepressant augmentations in treatment-resistant depression |
topic | Regular Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9211005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35167671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyac017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moderiechristophe sexdifferencesinresponsestoantidepressantaugmentationsintreatmentresistantdepression AT nuneznicolas sexdifferencesinresponsestoantidepressantaugmentationsintreatmentresistantdepression AT fieldingallan sexdifferencesinresponsestoantidepressantaugmentationsintreatmentresistantdepression AT comaistefano sexdifferencesinresponsestoantidepressantaugmentationsintreatmentresistantdepression AT gobbigabriella sexdifferencesinresponsestoantidepressantaugmentationsintreatmentresistantdepression |