Cargando…
Tracking Self-Control – Task Performance and Pupil Size in a Go/No-Go Inhibition Task
There is an ongoing debate about how to test and operationalize self-control. This limited understanding is in large part due to a variety of different tests and measures used to assess self-control, as well as the lack of empirical studies examining the temporal dynamics during the exertion of self...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9211021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747671 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915016 |
_version_ | 1784730274626535424 |
---|---|
author | Timme, Sinika Wolff, Wanja Englert, Chris Brand, Ralf |
author_facet | Timme, Sinika Wolff, Wanja Englert, Chris Brand, Ralf |
author_sort | Timme, Sinika |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is an ongoing debate about how to test and operationalize self-control. This limited understanding is in large part due to a variety of different tests and measures used to assess self-control, as well as the lack of empirical studies examining the temporal dynamics during the exertion of self-control. In order to track changes that occur over the course of exposure to a self-control task, we investigate and compare behavioral, subjective, and physiological indicators during the exertion of self-control. Participants completed both a task requiring inhibitory control (Go/No-Go task) and a control task (two-choice task). Behavioral performance and pupil size were measured during the tasks. Subjective vitality was measured before and after the tasks. While pupil size and subjective vitality showed similar trajectories in the two tasks, behavioral performance decreased in the inhibitory control-demanding task, but not in the control task. However, behavioral, subjective, and physiological measures were not significantly correlated. These results suggest that there is a disconnect between different measures of self-control with high intra- and interindividual variability. Theoretical and methodological implications for self-control theory and future empirical work are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9211021 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92110212022-06-22 Tracking Self-Control – Task Performance and Pupil Size in a Go/No-Go Inhibition Task Timme, Sinika Wolff, Wanja Englert, Chris Brand, Ralf Front Psychol Psychology There is an ongoing debate about how to test and operationalize self-control. This limited understanding is in large part due to a variety of different tests and measures used to assess self-control, as well as the lack of empirical studies examining the temporal dynamics during the exertion of self-control. In order to track changes that occur over the course of exposure to a self-control task, we investigate and compare behavioral, subjective, and physiological indicators during the exertion of self-control. Participants completed both a task requiring inhibitory control (Go/No-Go task) and a control task (two-choice task). Behavioral performance and pupil size were measured during the tasks. Subjective vitality was measured before and after the tasks. While pupil size and subjective vitality showed similar trajectories in the two tasks, behavioral performance decreased in the inhibitory control-demanding task, but not in the control task. However, behavioral, subjective, and physiological measures were not significantly correlated. These results suggest that there is a disconnect between different measures of self-control with high intra- and interindividual variability. Theoretical and methodological implications for self-control theory and future empirical work are discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9211021/ /pubmed/35747671 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915016 Text en Copyright © 2022 Timme, Wolff, Englert and Brand. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Timme, Sinika Wolff, Wanja Englert, Chris Brand, Ralf Tracking Self-Control – Task Performance and Pupil Size in a Go/No-Go Inhibition Task |
title | Tracking Self-Control – Task Performance and Pupil Size in a Go/No-Go Inhibition Task |
title_full | Tracking Self-Control – Task Performance and Pupil Size in a Go/No-Go Inhibition Task |
title_fullStr | Tracking Self-Control – Task Performance and Pupil Size in a Go/No-Go Inhibition Task |
title_full_unstemmed | Tracking Self-Control – Task Performance and Pupil Size in a Go/No-Go Inhibition Task |
title_short | Tracking Self-Control – Task Performance and Pupil Size in a Go/No-Go Inhibition Task |
title_sort | tracking self-control – task performance and pupil size in a go/no-go inhibition task |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9211021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747671 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT timmesinika trackingselfcontroltaskperformanceandpupilsizeinagonogoinhibitiontask AT wolffwanja trackingselfcontroltaskperformanceandpupilsizeinagonogoinhibitiontask AT englertchris trackingselfcontroltaskperformanceandpupilsizeinagonogoinhibitiontask AT brandralf trackingselfcontroltaskperformanceandpupilsizeinagonogoinhibitiontask |