Cargando…
Primary health care expenditure in the Americas: measuring what matters
This special report compares the measurement of primary health care (PHC) expenditure proposed by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and by the World Health Organization (WHO), according to the global framework for reporting health expenditures (SHA 2011) in three count...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Organización Panamericana de la Salud
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9211033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747469 http://dx.doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2022.70 |
_version_ | 1784730277646434304 |
---|---|
author | Rathe, Magdalena Hernández-Peña, Patricia Pescetto, Claudia Van Mosseveld, Cornelis Borges dos Santos, Maria Angélica Rivas, Laura |
author_facet | Rathe, Magdalena Hernández-Peña, Patricia Pescetto, Claudia Van Mosseveld, Cornelis Borges dos Santos, Maria Angélica Rivas, Laura |
author_sort | Rathe, Magdalena |
collection | PubMed |
description | This special report compares the measurement of primary health care (PHC) expenditure proposed by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and by the World Health Organization (WHO), according to the global framework for reporting health expenditures (SHA 2011) in three countries in the Region of the Americas. There are conceptual differences: (1) operationalization as basic care, by OECD, versus first contact, by WHO; (2) a wider range of goods and services in the WHO definition (including medicines, administration, and collective preventive services); and (3) consideration only of services in outpatient providers by OECD. PHC expenditures as a percentage of current healthcare spending in 2017 for WHO and OECD: Mexico (43.6% vs. 15.1%); Dominican Republic (41.1% vs. 5.75%), and Costa Rica (31.4% vs. 5.7%). The broad WHO definition of PHC as first contact facilitates inclusion of services that reflect the way countries provide care to their populations. Even so, WHO could improve its category descriptions for the purposes of international comparison. Restricting PHC to outpatient providers (as the OECD does) greatly limits measurement and excludes interventions intrinsic to the concept of PHC, such as collective preventive services. As a transitional step, we recommend that countries should monitor PHC funding and should explain what they include in their definition. SHA 2011 makes it possible to identify and compare these differences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9211033 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Organización Panamericana de la Salud |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92110332022-06-22 Primary health care expenditure in the Americas: measuring what matters Rathe, Magdalena Hernández-Peña, Patricia Pescetto, Claudia Van Mosseveld, Cornelis Borges dos Santos, Maria Angélica Rivas, Laura Rev Panam Salud Publica Special Report This special report compares the measurement of primary health care (PHC) expenditure proposed by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and by the World Health Organization (WHO), according to the global framework for reporting health expenditures (SHA 2011) in three countries in the Region of the Americas. There are conceptual differences: (1) operationalization as basic care, by OECD, versus first contact, by WHO; (2) a wider range of goods and services in the WHO definition (including medicines, administration, and collective preventive services); and (3) consideration only of services in outpatient providers by OECD. PHC expenditures as a percentage of current healthcare spending in 2017 for WHO and OECD: Mexico (43.6% vs. 15.1%); Dominican Republic (41.1% vs. 5.75%), and Costa Rica (31.4% vs. 5.7%). The broad WHO definition of PHC as first contact facilitates inclusion of services that reflect the way countries provide care to their populations. Even so, WHO could improve its category descriptions for the purposes of international comparison. Restricting PHC to outpatient providers (as the OECD does) greatly limits measurement and excludes interventions intrinsic to the concept of PHC, such as collective preventive services. As a transitional step, we recommend that countries should monitor PHC funding and should explain what they include in their definition. SHA 2011 makes it possible to identify and compare these differences. Organización Panamericana de la Salud 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9211033/ /pubmed/35747469 http://dx.doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2022.70 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 IGO License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. No modifications or commercial use of this article are permitted. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that PAHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the PAHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article’s original URL. Open access logo and text by PLoS, under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. |
spellingShingle | Special Report Rathe, Magdalena Hernández-Peña, Patricia Pescetto, Claudia Van Mosseveld, Cornelis Borges dos Santos, Maria Angélica Rivas, Laura Primary health care expenditure in the Americas: measuring what matters |
title | Primary health care expenditure in the Americas: measuring what matters |
title_full | Primary health care expenditure in the Americas: measuring what matters |
title_fullStr | Primary health care expenditure in the Americas: measuring what matters |
title_full_unstemmed | Primary health care expenditure in the Americas: measuring what matters |
title_short | Primary health care expenditure in the Americas: measuring what matters |
title_sort | primary health care expenditure in the americas: measuring what matters |
topic | Special Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9211033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747469 http://dx.doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2022.70 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rathemagdalena primaryhealthcareexpenditureintheamericasmeasuringwhatmatters AT hernandezpenapatricia primaryhealthcareexpenditureintheamericasmeasuringwhatmatters AT pescettoclaudia primaryhealthcareexpenditureintheamericasmeasuringwhatmatters AT vanmosseveldcornelis primaryhealthcareexpenditureintheamericasmeasuringwhatmatters AT borgesdossantosmariaangelica primaryhealthcareexpenditureintheamericasmeasuringwhatmatters AT rivaslaura primaryhealthcareexpenditureintheamericasmeasuringwhatmatters |