Cargando…

Increased Belief Instability in Psychotic Disorders Predicts Treatment Response to Metacognitive Training

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: In a complex world, gathering information and adjusting our beliefs about the world is of paramount importance. The literature suggests that patients with psychotic disorders display a tendency to draw early conclusions based on limited evidence, referred to as the jumping...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hauke, D J, Roth, V, Karvelis, P, Adams, R A, Moritz, S, Borgwardt, S, Diaconescu, A O, Andreou, C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9212107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35639557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbac029
_version_ 1784730505694937088
author Hauke, D J
Roth, V
Karvelis, P
Adams, R A
Moritz, S
Borgwardt, S
Diaconescu, A O
Andreou, C
author_facet Hauke, D J
Roth, V
Karvelis, P
Adams, R A
Moritz, S
Borgwardt, S
Diaconescu, A O
Andreou, C
author_sort Hauke, D J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: In a complex world, gathering information and adjusting our beliefs about the world is of paramount importance. The literature suggests that patients with psychotic disorders display a tendency to draw early conclusions based on limited evidence, referred to as the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but few studies have examined the computational mechanisms underlying this and related belief-updating biases. Here, we employ a computational approach to understand the relationship between jumping-to-conclusions, psychotic disorders, and delusions. STUDY DESIGN: We modeled probabilistic reasoning of 261 patients with psychotic disorders and 56 healthy controls during an information sampling task—the fish task—with the Hierarchical Gaussian Filter. Subsequently, we examined the clinical utility of this computational approach by testing whether computational parameters, obtained from fitting the model to each individual’s behavior, could predict treatment response to Metacognitive Training using machine learning. STUDY RESULTS: We observed differences in probabilistic reasoning between patients with psychotic disorders and healthy controls, participants with and without jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not between patients with low and high current delusions. The computational analysis suggested that belief instability was increased in patients with psychotic disorders. Jumping-to-conclusions was associated with both increased belief instability and greater prior uncertainty. Lastly, belief instability predicted treatment response to Metacognitive Training at the individual level. CONCLUSIONS: Our results point towards increased belief instability as a key computational mechanism underlying probabilistic reasoning in psychotic disorders. We provide a proof-of-concept that this computational approach may be useful to help identify suitable treatments for individual patients with psychotic disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9212107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92121072022-06-22 Increased Belief Instability in Psychotic Disorders Predicts Treatment Response to Metacognitive Training Hauke, D J Roth, V Karvelis, P Adams, R A Moritz, S Borgwardt, S Diaconescu, A O Andreou, C Schizophr Bull Regular Articles BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: In a complex world, gathering information and adjusting our beliefs about the world is of paramount importance. The literature suggests that patients with psychotic disorders display a tendency to draw early conclusions based on limited evidence, referred to as the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but few studies have examined the computational mechanisms underlying this and related belief-updating biases. Here, we employ a computational approach to understand the relationship between jumping-to-conclusions, psychotic disorders, and delusions. STUDY DESIGN: We modeled probabilistic reasoning of 261 patients with psychotic disorders and 56 healthy controls during an information sampling task—the fish task—with the Hierarchical Gaussian Filter. Subsequently, we examined the clinical utility of this computational approach by testing whether computational parameters, obtained from fitting the model to each individual’s behavior, could predict treatment response to Metacognitive Training using machine learning. STUDY RESULTS: We observed differences in probabilistic reasoning between patients with psychotic disorders and healthy controls, participants with and without jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not between patients with low and high current delusions. The computational analysis suggested that belief instability was increased in patients with psychotic disorders. Jumping-to-conclusions was associated with both increased belief instability and greater prior uncertainty. Lastly, belief instability predicted treatment response to Metacognitive Training at the individual level. CONCLUSIONS: Our results point towards increased belief instability as a key computational mechanism underlying probabilistic reasoning in psychotic disorders. We provide a proof-of-concept that this computational approach may be useful to help identify suitable treatments for individual patients with psychotic disorders. Oxford University Press 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9212107/ /pubmed/35639557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbac029 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Regular Articles
Hauke, D J
Roth, V
Karvelis, P
Adams, R A
Moritz, S
Borgwardt, S
Diaconescu, A O
Andreou, C
Increased Belief Instability in Psychotic Disorders Predicts Treatment Response to Metacognitive Training
title Increased Belief Instability in Psychotic Disorders Predicts Treatment Response to Metacognitive Training
title_full Increased Belief Instability in Psychotic Disorders Predicts Treatment Response to Metacognitive Training
title_fullStr Increased Belief Instability in Psychotic Disorders Predicts Treatment Response to Metacognitive Training
title_full_unstemmed Increased Belief Instability in Psychotic Disorders Predicts Treatment Response to Metacognitive Training
title_short Increased Belief Instability in Psychotic Disorders Predicts Treatment Response to Metacognitive Training
title_sort increased belief instability in psychotic disorders predicts treatment response to metacognitive training
topic Regular Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9212107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35639557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbac029
work_keys_str_mv AT haukedj increasedbeliefinstabilityinpsychoticdisorderspredictstreatmentresponsetometacognitivetraining
AT rothv increasedbeliefinstabilityinpsychoticdisorderspredictstreatmentresponsetometacognitivetraining
AT karvelisp increasedbeliefinstabilityinpsychoticdisorderspredictstreatmentresponsetometacognitivetraining
AT adamsra increasedbeliefinstabilityinpsychoticdisorderspredictstreatmentresponsetometacognitivetraining
AT moritzs increasedbeliefinstabilityinpsychoticdisorderspredictstreatmentresponsetometacognitivetraining
AT borgwardts increasedbeliefinstabilityinpsychoticdisorderspredictstreatmentresponsetometacognitivetraining
AT diaconescuao increasedbeliefinstabilityinpsychoticdisorderspredictstreatmentresponsetometacognitivetraining
AT andreouc increasedbeliefinstabilityinpsychoticdisorderspredictstreatmentresponsetometacognitivetraining