Cargando…

Safety evaluation of the single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine among healthcare workers in the Sisonke study in South Africa: A phase 3b implementation trial

BACKGROUND: Real-world evaluation of the safety profile of vaccines after licensure is crucial to accurately characterise safety beyond clinical trials, support continued use, and thereby improve public confidence. The Sisonke study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Janssen Ad26.CO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takuva, Simbarashe, Takalani, Azwidhwi, Seocharan, Ishen, Yende-Zuma, Nonhlanhla, Reddy, Tarylee, Engelbrecht, Imke, Faesen, Mark, Khuto, Kentse, Whyte, Carmen, Bailey, Veronique, Trivella, Valentina, Peter, Jonathan, Opie, Jessica, Louw, Vernon, Rowji, Pradeep, Jacobson, Barry, Groenewald, Pamela, Dorrington, Rob E., Laubscher, Ria, Bradshaw, Debbie, Moultrie, Harry, Fairall, Lara, Sanne, Ian, Gail-Bekker, Linda, Gray, Glenda, Goga, Ameena, Garrett, Nigel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9212139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35727802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004024
_version_ 1784730513248878592
author Takuva, Simbarashe
Takalani, Azwidhwi
Seocharan, Ishen
Yende-Zuma, Nonhlanhla
Reddy, Tarylee
Engelbrecht, Imke
Faesen, Mark
Khuto, Kentse
Whyte, Carmen
Bailey, Veronique
Trivella, Valentina
Peter, Jonathan
Opie, Jessica
Louw, Vernon
Rowji, Pradeep
Jacobson, Barry
Groenewald, Pamela
Dorrington, Rob E.
Laubscher, Ria
Bradshaw, Debbie
Moultrie, Harry
Fairall, Lara
Sanne, Ian
Gail-Bekker, Linda
Gray, Glenda
Goga, Ameena
Garrett, Nigel
author_facet Takuva, Simbarashe
Takalani, Azwidhwi
Seocharan, Ishen
Yende-Zuma, Nonhlanhla
Reddy, Tarylee
Engelbrecht, Imke
Faesen, Mark
Khuto, Kentse
Whyte, Carmen
Bailey, Veronique
Trivella, Valentina
Peter, Jonathan
Opie, Jessica
Louw, Vernon
Rowji, Pradeep
Jacobson, Barry
Groenewald, Pamela
Dorrington, Rob E.
Laubscher, Ria
Bradshaw, Debbie
Moultrie, Harry
Fairall, Lara
Sanne, Ian
Gail-Bekker, Linda
Gray, Glenda
Goga, Ameena
Garrett, Nigel
author_sort Takuva, Simbarashe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Real-world evaluation of the safety profile of vaccines after licensure is crucial to accurately characterise safety beyond clinical trials, support continued use, and thereby improve public confidence. The Sisonke study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Janssen Ad26.COV2.S vaccine among healthcare workers (HCWs) in South Africa. Here, we present the safety data. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In this open-label phase 3b implementation study among all eligible HCWs in South Africa registered in the national Electronic Vaccination Data System (EVDS), we monitored adverse events (AEs) at vaccination sites through self-reporting triggered by text messages after vaccination, healthcare provider reports, and active case finding. The frequency and incidence rate of non-serious and serious AEs were evaluated from the day of first vaccination (17 February 2021) until 28 days after the final vaccination in the study (15 June 2021). COVID-19 breakthrough infections, hospitalisations, and deaths were ascertained via linkage of the electronic vaccination register with existing national databases. Among 477,234 participants, 10,279 AEs were reported, of which 138 (1.3%) were serious AEs (SAEs) or AEs of special interest. Women reported more AEs than men (2.3% versus 1.6%). AE reports decreased with increasing age (3.2% for age 18–30 years, 2.1% for age 31–45 years, 1.8% for age 46–55 years, and 1.5% for age > 55 years). Participants with previous COVID-19 infection reported slightly more AEs (2.6% versus 2.1%). The most common reactogenicity events were headache (n = 4,923) and body aches (n = 4,483), followed by injection site pain (n = 2,767) and fever (n = 2,731), and most occurred within 48 hours of vaccination. Two cases of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome and 4 cases of Guillain-Barré Syndrome were reported post-vaccination. Most SAEs and AEs of special interest (n = 138) occurred at lower than the expected population rates. Vascular (n = 37; 39.1/100,000 person-years) and nervous system disorders (n = 31; 31.7/100,000 person-years), immune system disorders (n = 24; 24.3/100,000 person-years), and infections and infestations (n = 19; 20.1/100,000 person-years) were the most common reported SAE categories. A limitation of the study was the single-arm design, with limited routinely collected morbidity comparator data in the study setting. CONCLUSIONS: We observed similar patterns of AEs as in phase 3 trials. AEs were mostly expected reactogenicity signs and symptoms. Furthermore, most SAEs occurred below expected rates. The single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, supporting the continued use of this vaccine in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04838795; Pan African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR202102855526180.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9212139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92121392022-06-22 Safety evaluation of the single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine among healthcare workers in the Sisonke study in South Africa: A phase 3b implementation trial Takuva, Simbarashe Takalani, Azwidhwi Seocharan, Ishen Yende-Zuma, Nonhlanhla Reddy, Tarylee Engelbrecht, Imke Faesen, Mark Khuto, Kentse Whyte, Carmen Bailey, Veronique Trivella, Valentina Peter, Jonathan Opie, Jessica Louw, Vernon Rowji, Pradeep Jacobson, Barry Groenewald, Pamela Dorrington, Rob E. Laubscher, Ria Bradshaw, Debbie Moultrie, Harry Fairall, Lara Sanne, Ian Gail-Bekker, Linda Gray, Glenda Goga, Ameena Garrett, Nigel PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Real-world evaluation of the safety profile of vaccines after licensure is crucial to accurately characterise safety beyond clinical trials, support continued use, and thereby improve public confidence. The Sisonke study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Janssen Ad26.COV2.S vaccine among healthcare workers (HCWs) in South Africa. Here, we present the safety data. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In this open-label phase 3b implementation study among all eligible HCWs in South Africa registered in the national Electronic Vaccination Data System (EVDS), we monitored adverse events (AEs) at vaccination sites through self-reporting triggered by text messages after vaccination, healthcare provider reports, and active case finding. The frequency and incidence rate of non-serious and serious AEs were evaluated from the day of first vaccination (17 February 2021) until 28 days after the final vaccination in the study (15 June 2021). COVID-19 breakthrough infections, hospitalisations, and deaths were ascertained via linkage of the electronic vaccination register with existing national databases. Among 477,234 participants, 10,279 AEs were reported, of which 138 (1.3%) were serious AEs (SAEs) or AEs of special interest. Women reported more AEs than men (2.3% versus 1.6%). AE reports decreased with increasing age (3.2% for age 18–30 years, 2.1% for age 31–45 years, 1.8% for age 46–55 years, and 1.5% for age > 55 years). Participants with previous COVID-19 infection reported slightly more AEs (2.6% versus 2.1%). The most common reactogenicity events were headache (n = 4,923) and body aches (n = 4,483), followed by injection site pain (n = 2,767) and fever (n = 2,731), and most occurred within 48 hours of vaccination. Two cases of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome and 4 cases of Guillain-Barré Syndrome were reported post-vaccination. Most SAEs and AEs of special interest (n = 138) occurred at lower than the expected population rates. Vascular (n = 37; 39.1/100,000 person-years) and nervous system disorders (n = 31; 31.7/100,000 person-years), immune system disorders (n = 24; 24.3/100,000 person-years), and infections and infestations (n = 19; 20.1/100,000 person-years) were the most common reported SAE categories. A limitation of the study was the single-arm design, with limited routinely collected morbidity comparator data in the study setting. CONCLUSIONS: We observed similar patterns of AEs as in phase 3 trials. AEs were mostly expected reactogenicity signs and symptoms. Furthermore, most SAEs occurred below expected rates. The single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, supporting the continued use of this vaccine in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04838795; Pan African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR202102855526180. Public Library of Science 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9212139/ /pubmed/35727802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004024 Text en © 2022 Takuva et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Takuva, Simbarashe
Takalani, Azwidhwi
Seocharan, Ishen
Yende-Zuma, Nonhlanhla
Reddy, Tarylee
Engelbrecht, Imke
Faesen, Mark
Khuto, Kentse
Whyte, Carmen
Bailey, Veronique
Trivella, Valentina
Peter, Jonathan
Opie, Jessica
Louw, Vernon
Rowji, Pradeep
Jacobson, Barry
Groenewald, Pamela
Dorrington, Rob E.
Laubscher, Ria
Bradshaw, Debbie
Moultrie, Harry
Fairall, Lara
Sanne, Ian
Gail-Bekker, Linda
Gray, Glenda
Goga, Ameena
Garrett, Nigel
Safety evaluation of the single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine among healthcare workers in the Sisonke study in South Africa: A phase 3b implementation trial
title Safety evaluation of the single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine among healthcare workers in the Sisonke study in South Africa: A phase 3b implementation trial
title_full Safety evaluation of the single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine among healthcare workers in the Sisonke study in South Africa: A phase 3b implementation trial
title_fullStr Safety evaluation of the single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine among healthcare workers in the Sisonke study in South Africa: A phase 3b implementation trial
title_full_unstemmed Safety evaluation of the single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine among healthcare workers in the Sisonke study in South Africa: A phase 3b implementation trial
title_short Safety evaluation of the single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine among healthcare workers in the Sisonke study in South Africa: A phase 3b implementation trial
title_sort safety evaluation of the single-dose ad26.cov2.s vaccine among healthcare workers in the sisonke study in south africa: a phase 3b implementation trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9212139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35727802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004024
work_keys_str_mv AT takuvasimbarashe safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT takalaniazwidhwi safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT seocharanishen safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT yendezumanonhlanhla safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT reddytarylee safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT engelbrechtimke safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT faesenmark safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT khutokentse safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT whytecarmen safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT baileyveronique safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT trivellavalentina safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT peterjonathan safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT opiejessica safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT louwvernon safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT rowjipradeep safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT jacobsonbarry safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT groenewaldpamela safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT dorringtonrobe safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT laubscherria safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT bradshawdebbie safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT moultrieharry safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT fairalllara safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT sanneian safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT gailbekkerlinda safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT grayglenda safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT gogaameena safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT garrettnigel safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial
AT safetyevaluationofthesingledosead26cov2svaccineamonghealthcareworkersinthesisonkestudyinsouthafricaaphase3bimplementationtrial