Cargando…

Validity and reliability of handgrip dynamometry in older adults: A comparison of two widely used dynamometers

BACKGROUND: Among older adults, decreased handgrip strength is associated with greater risk of frailty, and loss of physical function, mobility, lean mass, and overall muscular strength and power. Frailty is also associated with sarcopenia, for which handgrip strength measurement has been recommende...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benton, Melissa J., Spicher, Jefferson M., Silva-Smith, Amy L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9212147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35727792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270132
_version_ 1784730515249561600
author Benton, Melissa J.
Spicher, Jefferson M.
Silva-Smith, Amy L.
author_facet Benton, Melissa J.
Spicher, Jefferson M.
Silva-Smith, Amy L.
author_sort Benton, Melissa J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Among older adults, decreased handgrip strength is associated with greater risk of frailty, and loss of physical function, mobility, lean mass, and overall muscular strength and power. Frailty is also associated with sarcopenia, for which handgrip strength measurement has been recommended for diagnostic purposes. Specific cutoff points for diagnosis have been identified, but use of different devices may affect measurement. Therefore to assess validity and reliability, we compared the two most frequently used devices, the Jamar hydraulic and Smedley spring handgrip dynamometers. METHODS: Sixty-seven older (76.2 ± 0.9 years) men (n = 34) and women (n = 33) completed two trials of handgrip strength measurement on sequential days (T1, T2) using both devices in random order. Intraclass correlations were used to assess test-retest reliability, and Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess validity as the level of agreement between devices. RESULTS: There were significant (p < 0.001) relationships between devices at T1 (r = 0.94) and T2 (r = 0.94) and strong (p < 0.001) intraclass correlations were observed for both devices (Jamar = 0.98; Smedley = 0.96), indicating excellent reliability. However, there were significant differences between devices. Strength measured with Jamar was greater than Smedley at both T1 (27.4 ± 1.4 vs. 23.4 ± 1.1 kg, p < 0.001) and T2 (25.3 ± 1.4 vs. 21.8 ± 1.2 kg, p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis confirmed these differences. Subgroup analysis to evaluate the effect of gender and age indicated that in women and old-old (>75 years) participants, differences between devices were closer to zero for both measurements compared to men and young-old (65–75 years) participants. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that despite excellent reliability, there is poor agreement between devices, indicating a lack of validity. For use as a diagnostic tool, standardization and device-specific cutoff points for handgrip dynamometry are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9212147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92121472022-06-22 Validity and reliability of handgrip dynamometry in older adults: A comparison of two widely used dynamometers Benton, Melissa J. Spicher, Jefferson M. Silva-Smith, Amy L. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Among older adults, decreased handgrip strength is associated with greater risk of frailty, and loss of physical function, mobility, lean mass, and overall muscular strength and power. Frailty is also associated with sarcopenia, for which handgrip strength measurement has been recommended for diagnostic purposes. Specific cutoff points for diagnosis have been identified, but use of different devices may affect measurement. Therefore to assess validity and reliability, we compared the two most frequently used devices, the Jamar hydraulic and Smedley spring handgrip dynamometers. METHODS: Sixty-seven older (76.2 ± 0.9 years) men (n = 34) and women (n = 33) completed two trials of handgrip strength measurement on sequential days (T1, T2) using both devices in random order. Intraclass correlations were used to assess test-retest reliability, and Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess validity as the level of agreement between devices. RESULTS: There were significant (p < 0.001) relationships between devices at T1 (r = 0.94) and T2 (r = 0.94) and strong (p < 0.001) intraclass correlations were observed for both devices (Jamar = 0.98; Smedley = 0.96), indicating excellent reliability. However, there were significant differences between devices. Strength measured with Jamar was greater than Smedley at both T1 (27.4 ± 1.4 vs. 23.4 ± 1.1 kg, p < 0.001) and T2 (25.3 ± 1.4 vs. 21.8 ± 1.2 kg, p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis confirmed these differences. Subgroup analysis to evaluate the effect of gender and age indicated that in women and old-old (>75 years) participants, differences between devices were closer to zero for both measurements compared to men and young-old (65–75 years) participants. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that despite excellent reliability, there is poor agreement between devices, indicating a lack of validity. For use as a diagnostic tool, standardization and device-specific cutoff points for handgrip dynamometry are needed. Public Library of Science 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9212147/ /pubmed/35727792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270132 Text en © 2022 Benton et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Benton, Melissa J.
Spicher, Jefferson M.
Silva-Smith, Amy L.
Validity and reliability of handgrip dynamometry in older adults: A comparison of two widely used dynamometers
title Validity and reliability of handgrip dynamometry in older adults: A comparison of two widely used dynamometers
title_full Validity and reliability of handgrip dynamometry in older adults: A comparison of two widely used dynamometers
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of handgrip dynamometry in older adults: A comparison of two widely used dynamometers
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of handgrip dynamometry in older adults: A comparison of two widely used dynamometers
title_short Validity and reliability of handgrip dynamometry in older adults: A comparison of two widely used dynamometers
title_sort validity and reliability of handgrip dynamometry in older adults: a comparison of two widely used dynamometers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9212147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35727792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270132
work_keys_str_mv AT bentonmelissaj validityandreliabilityofhandgripdynamometryinolderadultsacomparisonoftwowidelyuseddynamometers
AT spicherjeffersonm validityandreliabilityofhandgripdynamometryinolderadultsacomparisonoftwowidelyuseddynamometers
AT silvasmithamyl validityandreliabilityofhandgripdynamometryinolderadultsacomparisonoftwowidelyuseddynamometers