Cargando…

Dynamics of reproductive genetic technologies: Perspectives of professional stakeholders

Reproductive and genetic medicine are evolving rapidly, and new technologies are already impacting current practices. This includes technologies that can identify a couples’ risk of having a child with a genetic disorder. Responsible implementation of new technologies requires evaluation of safety a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Dijke, Ivy, van El, Carla G., Lakeman, Phillis, Goddijn, Mariëtte, Rigter, Tessel, Cornel, Martina C., Henneman, Lidewij
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9212161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35727796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269719
_version_ 1784730518748659712
author van Dijke, Ivy
van El, Carla G.
Lakeman, Phillis
Goddijn, Mariëtte
Rigter, Tessel
Cornel, Martina C.
Henneman, Lidewij
author_facet van Dijke, Ivy
van El, Carla G.
Lakeman, Phillis
Goddijn, Mariëtte
Rigter, Tessel
Cornel, Martina C.
Henneman, Lidewij
author_sort van Dijke, Ivy
collection PubMed
description Reproductive and genetic medicine are evolving rapidly, and new technologies are already impacting current practices. This includes technologies that can identify a couples’ risk of having a child with a genetic disorder. Responsible implementation of new technologies requires evaluation of safety and ethics. Valuable insights for shaping governance processes are provided by various stakeholders involved, including healthcare professionals. Their willingness to adopt these technologies and guide the necessary systemic changes is required for the successful implementation of these technologies. In this study, twenty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with professionals from different disciplines in the field of reproductive and genetic healthcare in the Netherlands. Three emerging technologies were discussed: expanded carrier screening (ECS), non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) and germline genome editing (GGE). By probing stakeholders’ views, we explored how culture, structure and practice in healthcare is being shaped by innovations and changing dynamics in genetic and reproductive medicine. The general consensus was that the implementation of reproductive genetic technologies nationwide is a slow process in Dutch healthcare. A “typical Dutch approach” emerged that is characterized by restrictive legislation, broad support for people living with disabilities, values of an egalitarian society and limited commercialisation. Different scenarios for embedding ECS in future practice were envisioned, while implementation of NIPD in clinical practice was considered obvious. Views on GGE varied among stakeholders. Previous implementation examples in the Netherlands suggest introduction of new technology involves an organized collective learning process, with pilot studies and stepwise implementation. In addition, introducing and scaling up new technologies is complex due to perceived barriers from the legislative framework and the complex relationship between the government and stakeholders in this area. This paper describes how the international trends and advances of technologies are expected to manifest itself in a national setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9212161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92121612022-06-22 Dynamics of reproductive genetic technologies: Perspectives of professional stakeholders van Dijke, Ivy van El, Carla G. Lakeman, Phillis Goddijn, Mariëtte Rigter, Tessel Cornel, Martina C. Henneman, Lidewij PLoS One Research Article Reproductive and genetic medicine are evolving rapidly, and new technologies are already impacting current practices. This includes technologies that can identify a couples’ risk of having a child with a genetic disorder. Responsible implementation of new technologies requires evaluation of safety and ethics. Valuable insights for shaping governance processes are provided by various stakeholders involved, including healthcare professionals. Their willingness to adopt these technologies and guide the necessary systemic changes is required for the successful implementation of these technologies. In this study, twenty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with professionals from different disciplines in the field of reproductive and genetic healthcare in the Netherlands. Three emerging technologies were discussed: expanded carrier screening (ECS), non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) and germline genome editing (GGE). By probing stakeholders’ views, we explored how culture, structure and practice in healthcare is being shaped by innovations and changing dynamics in genetic and reproductive medicine. The general consensus was that the implementation of reproductive genetic technologies nationwide is a slow process in Dutch healthcare. A “typical Dutch approach” emerged that is characterized by restrictive legislation, broad support for people living with disabilities, values of an egalitarian society and limited commercialisation. Different scenarios for embedding ECS in future practice were envisioned, while implementation of NIPD in clinical practice was considered obvious. Views on GGE varied among stakeholders. Previous implementation examples in the Netherlands suggest introduction of new technology involves an organized collective learning process, with pilot studies and stepwise implementation. In addition, introducing and scaling up new technologies is complex due to perceived barriers from the legislative framework and the complex relationship between the government and stakeholders in this area. This paper describes how the international trends and advances of technologies are expected to manifest itself in a national setting. Public Library of Science 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9212161/ /pubmed/35727796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269719 Text en © 2022 van Dijke et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Dijke, Ivy
van El, Carla G.
Lakeman, Phillis
Goddijn, Mariëtte
Rigter, Tessel
Cornel, Martina C.
Henneman, Lidewij
Dynamics of reproductive genetic technologies: Perspectives of professional stakeholders
title Dynamics of reproductive genetic technologies: Perspectives of professional stakeholders
title_full Dynamics of reproductive genetic technologies: Perspectives of professional stakeholders
title_fullStr Dynamics of reproductive genetic technologies: Perspectives of professional stakeholders
title_full_unstemmed Dynamics of reproductive genetic technologies: Perspectives of professional stakeholders
title_short Dynamics of reproductive genetic technologies: Perspectives of professional stakeholders
title_sort dynamics of reproductive genetic technologies: perspectives of professional stakeholders
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9212161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35727796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269719
work_keys_str_mv AT vandijkeivy dynamicsofreproductivegenetictechnologiesperspectivesofprofessionalstakeholders
AT vanelcarlag dynamicsofreproductivegenetictechnologiesperspectivesofprofessionalstakeholders
AT lakemanphillis dynamicsofreproductivegenetictechnologiesperspectivesofprofessionalstakeholders
AT goddijnmariette dynamicsofreproductivegenetictechnologiesperspectivesofprofessionalstakeholders
AT rigtertessel dynamicsofreproductivegenetictechnologiesperspectivesofprofessionalstakeholders
AT cornelmartinac dynamicsofreproductivegenetictechnologiesperspectivesofprofessionalstakeholders
AT hennemanlidewij dynamicsofreproductivegenetictechnologiesperspectivesofprofessionalstakeholders