Cargando…
Dynamics of reproductive genetic technologies: Perspectives of professional stakeholders
Reproductive and genetic medicine are evolving rapidly, and new technologies are already impacting current practices. This includes technologies that can identify a couples’ risk of having a child with a genetic disorder. Responsible implementation of new technologies requires evaluation of safety a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9212161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35727796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269719 |
_version_ | 1784730518748659712 |
---|---|
author | van Dijke, Ivy van El, Carla G. Lakeman, Phillis Goddijn, Mariëtte Rigter, Tessel Cornel, Martina C. Henneman, Lidewij |
author_facet | van Dijke, Ivy van El, Carla G. Lakeman, Phillis Goddijn, Mariëtte Rigter, Tessel Cornel, Martina C. Henneman, Lidewij |
author_sort | van Dijke, Ivy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reproductive and genetic medicine are evolving rapidly, and new technologies are already impacting current practices. This includes technologies that can identify a couples’ risk of having a child with a genetic disorder. Responsible implementation of new technologies requires evaluation of safety and ethics. Valuable insights for shaping governance processes are provided by various stakeholders involved, including healthcare professionals. Their willingness to adopt these technologies and guide the necessary systemic changes is required for the successful implementation of these technologies. In this study, twenty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with professionals from different disciplines in the field of reproductive and genetic healthcare in the Netherlands. Three emerging technologies were discussed: expanded carrier screening (ECS), non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) and germline genome editing (GGE). By probing stakeholders’ views, we explored how culture, structure and practice in healthcare is being shaped by innovations and changing dynamics in genetic and reproductive medicine. The general consensus was that the implementation of reproductive genetic technologies nationwide is a slow process in Dutch healthcare. A “typical Dutch approach” emerged that is characterized by restrictive legislation, broad support for people living with disabilities, values of an egalitarian society and limited commercialisation. Different scenarios for embedding ECS in future practice were envisioned, while implementation of NIPD in clinical practice was considered obvious. Views on GGE varied among stakeholders. Previous implementation examples in the Netherlands suggest introduction of new technology involves an organized collective learning process, with pilot studies and stepwise implementation. In addition, introducing and scaling up new technologies is complex due to perceived barriers from the legislative framework and the complex relationship between the government and stakeholders in this area. This paper describes how the international trends and advances of technologies are expected to manifest itself in a national setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9212161 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92121612022-06-22 Dynamics of reproductive genetic technologies: Perspectives of professional stakeholders van Dijke, Ivy van El, Carla G. Lakeman, Phillis Goddijn, Mariëtte Rigter, Tessel Cornel, Martina C. Henneman, Lidewij PLoS One Research Article Reproductive and genetic medicine are evolving rapidly, and new technologies are already impacting current practices. This includes technologies that can identify a couples’ risk of having a child with a genetic disorder. Responsible implementation of new technologies requires evaluation of safety and ethics. Valuable insights for shaping governance processes are provided by various stakeholders involved, including healthcare professionals. Their willingness to adopt these technologies and guide the necessary systemic changes is required for the successful implementation of these technologies. In this study, twenty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with professionals from different disciplines in the field of reproductive and genetic healthcare in the Netherlands. Three emerging technologies were discussed: expanded carrier screening (ECS), non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) and germline genome editing (GGE). By probing stakeholders’ views, we explored how culture, structure and practice in healthcare is being shaped by innovations and changing dynamics in genetic and reproductive medicine. The general consensus was that the implementation of reproductive genetic technologies nationwide is a slow process in Dutch healthcare. A “typical Dutch approach” emerged that is characterized by restrictive legislation, broad support for people living with disabilities, values of an egalitarian society and limited commercialisation. Different scenarios for embedding ECS in future practice were envisioned, while implementation of NIPD in clinical practice was considered obvious. Views on GGE varied among stakeholders. Previous implementation examples in the Netherlands suggest introduction of new technology involves an organized collective learning process, with pilot studies and stepwise implementation. In addition, introducing and scaling up new technologies is complex due to perceived barriers from the legislative framework and the complex relationship between the government and stakeholders in this area. This paper describes how the international trends and advances of technologies are expected to manifest itself in a national setting. Public Library of Science 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9212161/ /pubmed/35727796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269719 Text en © 2022 van Dijke et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van Dijke, Ivy van El, Carla G. Lakeman, Phillis Goddijn, Mariëtte Rigter, Tessel Cornel, Martina C. Henneman, Lidewij Dynamics of reproductive genetic technologies: Perspectives of professional stakeholders |
title | Dynamics of reproductive genetic technologies: Perspectives of professional stakeholders |
title_full | Dynamics of reproductive genetic technologies: Perspectives of professional stakeholders |
title_fullStr | Dynamics of reproductive genetic technologies: Perspectives of professional stakeholders |
title_full_unstemmed | Dynamics of reproductive genetic technologies: Perspectives of professional stakeholders |
title_short | Dynamics of reproductive genetic technologies: Perspectives of professional stakeholders |
title_sort | dynamics of reproductive genetic technologies: perspectives of professional stakeholders |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9212161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35727796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269719 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandijkeivy dynamicsofreproductivegenetictechnologiesperspectivesofprofessionalstakeholders AT vanelcarlag dynamicsofreproductivegenetictechnologiesperspectivesofprofessionalstakeholders AT lakemanphillis dynamicsofreproductivegenetictechnologiesperspectivesofprofessionalstakeholders AT goddijnmariette dynamicsofreproductivegenetictechnologiesperspectivesofprofessionalstakeholders AT rigtertessel dynamicsofreproductivegenetictechnologiesperspectivesofprofessionalstakeholders AT cornelmartinac dynamicsofreproductivegenetictechnologiesperspectivesofprofessionalstakeholders AT hennemanlidewij dynamicsofreproductivegenetictechnologiesperspectivesofprofessionalstakeholders |