Cargando…

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac rhythm management services: Views from the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND: Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac rhythm management (CRM) services remain poorly quantified. OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of COVID-19 on specialist CRM centers in the United Kingdom (UK). METHODS: Two-center study involving the Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Founda...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Wern Yew, Cranley, James, Begley, David, Rao, Archana, Snowdon, Richard L., Mellor, Greg, Gupta, Dhiraj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9213026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35756140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2022.05.013
_version_ 1784730746775142400
author Ding, Wern Yew
Cranley, James
Begley, David
Rao, Archana
Snowdon, Richard L.
Mellor, Greg
Gupta, Dhiraj
author_facet Ding, Wern Yew
Cranley, James
Begley, David
Rao, Archana
Snowdon, Richard L.
Mellor, Greg
Gupta, Dhiraj
author_sort Ding, Wern Yew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac rhythm management (CRM) services remain poorly quantified. OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of COVID-19 on specialist CRM centers in the United Kingdom (UK). METHODS: Two-center study involving the Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. The first nationwide lockdown lasted from April to July 2020 and the second from December 2020 to March 2021. RESULTS: Compared to the pre-pandemic period, pandemic 1 (April–July 2020) was associated with a 52.2% reduction in electrophysiology (EP) procedures (P = .083), 32.7% reduction in device procedures (P = .003), and 36.8% decrease in CRM referrals (P < .001). There was also a 13.4% increase in the use of conscious sedation (CS) (P < .001) and day-case procedures for EP (P = .003), with no change in day-case device procedures (P = .555). Corresponding numbers for pandemic 2 (August–November 2020) were a 0.7% increase in EP procedures (P = .925), 7.9% reduction in device procedures (P = .232), 13.9% decrease in referrals (P = .014), 5.5% increase in CS for EP (P = .009), 7.1% increase in day-case EP procedures (P < .001), and no change in day-case device procedures (P = .537). Corresponding numbers for pandemic 3 (December 2020–March 2021) were a 31.6% reduction in EP procedures (P = .001), 22.3% reduction in device procedures (P = .006), 8.4% decrease in referrals (P = .094), 11.0% increase in CS for EP (P < .001), 7.6% increase in day-case EP procedures (P = .003), and no change in day-case device procedures (P = .146). By the end of March 2021, the CRM waiting list was 167.8% pre-pandemic levels. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, specialist centers in the UK were affected such that the number of procedures performed was greatly reduced in the initial period with latter improvements as better coping strategies were developed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9213026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92130262022-06-22 Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac rhythm management services: Views from the United Kingdom Ding, Wern Yew Cranley, James Begley, David Rao, Archana Snowdon, Richard L. Mellor, Greg Gupta, Dhiraj Heart Rhythm O2 Clinical BACKGROUND: Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac rhythm management (CRM) services remain poorly quantified. OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of COVID-19 on specialist CRM centers in the United Kingdom (UK). METHODS: Two-center study involving the Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. The first nationwide lockdown lasted from April to July 2020 and the second from December 2020 to March 2021. RESULTS: Compared to the pre-pandemic period, pandemic 1 (April–July 2020) was associated with a 52.2% reduction in electrophysiology (EP) procedures (P = .083), 32.7% reduction in device procedures (P = .003), and 36.8% decrease in CRM referrals (P < .001). There was also a 13.4% increase in the use of conscious sedation (CS) (P < .001) and day-case procedures for EP (P = .003), with no change in day-case device procedures (P = .555). Corresponding numbers for pandemic 2 (August–November 2020) were a 0.7% increase in EP procedures (P = .925), 7.9% reduction in device procedures (P = .232), 13.9% decrease in referrals (P = .014), 5.5% increase in CS for EP (P = .009), 7.1% increase in day-case EP procedures (P < .001), and no change in day-case device procedures (P = .537). Corresponding numbers for pandemic 3 (December 2020–March 2021) were a 31.6% reduction in EP procedures (P = .001), 22.3% reduction in device procedures (P = .006), 8.4% decrease in referrals (P = .094), 11.0% increase in CS for EP (P < .001), 7.6% increase in day-case EP procedures (P = .003), and no change in day-case device procedures (P = .146). By the end of March 2021, the CRM waiting list was 167.8% pre-pandemic levels. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, specialist centers in the UK were affected such that the number of procedures performed was greatly reduced in the initial period with latter improvements as better coping strategies were developed. Elsevier 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9213026/ /pubmed/35756140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2022.05.013 Text en © 2022 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical
Ding, Wern Yew
Cranley, James
Begley, David
Rao, Archana
Snowdon, Richard L.
Mellor, Greg
Gupta, Dhiraj
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac rhythm management services: Views from the United Kingdom
title Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac rhythm management services: Views from the United Kingdom
title_full Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac rhythm management services: Views from the United Kingdom
title_fullStr Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac rhythm management services: Views from the United Kingdom
title_full_unstemmed Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac rhythm management services: Views from the United Kingdom
title_short Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac rhythm management services: Views from the United Kingdom
title_sort impact of covid-19 pandemic on cardiac rhythm management services: views from the united kingdom
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9213026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35756140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2022.05.013
work_keys_str_mv AT dingwernyew impactofcovid19pandemiconcardiacrhythmmanagementservicesviewsfromtheunitedkingdom
AT cranleyjames impactofcovid19pandemiconcardiacrhythmmanagementservicesviewsfromtheunitedkingdom
AT begleydavid impactofcovid19pandemiconcardiacrhythmmanagementservicesviewsfromtheunitedkingdom
AT raoarchana impactofcovid19pandemiconcardiacrhythmmanagementservicesviewsfromtheunitedkingdom
AT snowdonrichardl impactofcovid19pandemiconcardiacrhythmmanagementservicesviewsfromtheunitedkingdom
AT mellorgreg impactofcovid19pandemiconcardiacrhythmmanagementservicesviewsfromtheunitedkingdom
AT guptadhiraj impactofcovid19pandemiconcardiacrhythmmanagementservicesviewsfromtheunitedkingdom