Cargando…

Characterization of Phrenic Nerve Response to Pulsed Field Ablation

Phrenic nerve palsy is a well-known complication of cardiac ablation, resulting from the application of direct thermal energy. Emerging pulsed field ablation (PFA) may reduce the risk of phrenic nerve injury but has not been well characterized. METHODS: Accelerometers and continuous pacing were used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Howard, Brian, Haines, David E., Verma, Atul, Kirchhof, Nicole, Barka, Noah, Onal, Birce, Stewart, Mark T., Sigg, Daniel C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9213085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35649121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010127
_version_ 1784730757371002880
author Howard, Brian
Haines, David E.
Verma, Atul
Kirchhof, Nicole
Barka, Noah
Onal, Birce
Stewart, Mark T.
Sigg, Daniel C.
author_facet Howard, Brian
Haines, David E.
Verma, Atul
Kirchhof, Nicole
Barka, Noah
Onal, Birce
Stewart, Mark T.
Sigg, Daniel C.
author_sort Howard, Brian
collection PubMed
description Phrenic nerve palsy is a well-known complication of cardiac ablation, resulting from the application of direct thermal energy. Emerging pulsed field ablation (PFA) may reduce the risk of phrenic nerve injury but has not been well characterized. METHODS: Accelerometers and continuous pacing were used during PFA deliveries in a porcine model. Acute dose response was established in a first experimental phase with ascending PFA intensity delivered to the phrenic nerve (n=12). In a second phase, nerves were targeted with a single ablation level to observe the effect of repetitive ablations on nerve function (n=4). A third chronic phase characterized assessed histopathology of nerves adjacent to ablated cardiac tissue (n=6). RESULTS: Acutely, we observed a dose-dependent response in phrenic nerve function including reversible stunning (R(2)=0.965, P<0.001). Furthermore, acute results demonstrated that phrenic nerve function responded to varying levels of PFA and catheter proximity placements, resulting in either: no effect, effect, or stunning. In the chronic study phase, successful isolation of superior vena cava at a dose not predicted to cause phrenic nerve dysfunction was associated with normal phrenic nerve function and normal phrenic nerve histopathology at 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Proximity of the catheter to the phrenic nerve and the PFA dose level were critical for phrenic nerve response. Gross and histopathologic evaluation of phrenic nerves and diaphragms at a chronic time point yielded no injury. These results provide a basis for understanding the susceptibility and recovery of phrenic nerves in response to PFA and a need for appropriate caution in moving beyond animal models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9213085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92130852022-06-23 Characterization of Phrenic Nerve Response to Pulsed Field Ablation Howard, Brian Haines, David E. Verma, Atul Kirchhof, Nicole Barka, Noah Onal, Birce Stewart, Mark T. Sigg, Daniel C. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Original Articles Phrenic nerve palsy is a well-known complication of cardiac ablation, resulting from the application of direct thermal energy. Emerging pulsed field ablation (PFA) may reduce the risk of phrenic nerve injury but has not been well characterized. METHODS: Accelerometers and continuous pacing were used during PFA deliveries in a porcine model. Acute dose response was established in a first experimental phase with ascending PFA intensity delivered to the phrenic nerve (n=12). In a second phase, nerves were targeted with a single ablation level to observe the effect of repetitive ablations on nerve function (n=4). A third chronic phase characterized assessed histopathology of nerves adjacent to ablated cardiac tissue (n=6). RESULTS: Acutely, we observed a dose-dependent response in phrenic nerve function including reversible stunning (R(2)=0.965, P<0.001). Furthermore, acute results demonstrated that phrenic nerve function responded to varying levels of PFA and catheter proximity placements, resulting in either: no effect, effect, or stunning. In the chronic study phase, successful isolation of superior vena cava at a dose not predicted to cause phrenic nerve dysfunction was associated with normal phrenic nerve function and normal phrenic nerve histopathology at 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Proximity of the catheter to the phrenic nerve and the PFA dose level were critical for phrenic nerve response. Gross and histopathologic evaluation of phrenic nerves and diaphragms at a chronic time point yielded no injury. These results provide a basis for understanding the susceptibility and recovery of phrenic nerves in response to PFA and a need for appropriate caution in moving beyond animal models. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9213085/ /pubmed/35649121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010127 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDerivs (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Howard, Brian
Haines, David E.
Verma, Atul
Kirchhof, Nicole
Barka, Noah
Onal, Birce
Stewart, Mark T.
Sigg, Daniel C.
Characterization of Phrenic Nerve Response to Pulsed Field Ablation
title Characterization of Phrenic Nerve Response to Pulsed Field Ablation
title_full Characterization of Phrenic Nerve Response to Pulsed Field Ablation
title_fullStr Characterization of Phrenic Nerve Response to Pulsed Field Ablation
title_full_unstemmed Characterization of Phrenic Nerve Response to Pulsed Field Ablation
title_short Characterization of Phrenic Nerve Response to Pulsed Field Ablation
title_sort characterization of phrenic nerve response to pulsed field ablation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9213085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35649121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010127
work_keys_str_mv AT howardbrian characterizationofphrenicnerveresponsetopulsedfieldablation
AT hainesdavide characterizationofphrenicnerveresponsetopulsedfieldablation
AT vermaatul characterizationofphrenicnerveresponsetopulsedfieldablation
AT kirchhofnicole characterizationofphrenicnerveresponsetopulsedfieldablation
AT barkanoah characterizationofphrenicnerveresponsetopulsedfieldablation
AT onalbirce characterizationofphrenicnerveresponsetopulsedfieldablation
AT stewartmarkt characterizationofphrenicnerveresponsetopulsedfieldablation
AT siggdanielc characterizationofphrenicnerveresponsetopulsedfieldablation