Cargando…

Clinical impact of assessing thrombus age using magnetic resonance venography prior to catheter-directed thrombolysis

OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance venography (MRV) is underutilized in the evaluation of thrombus properties prior to endovascular treatment but may improve procedural outcomes. We therefore investigated the clinical impact of using a dedicated MRV scoring system to assess thrombus characteristics prio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arnoldussen, Carsten W. K. P., Notten, Pascale, Brans, Rutger, Vroegindeweij, Dammis, Tick, Lidwine W., van de Poel, Marlène H. W., Wikkeling, Otmar R. M., Vleming, Louis-Jean, Koster, Ad, Jie, Kon-Siong G., Jacobs, Esther M. G., Planken, Nils, Wittens, Cees H. A., ten Cate, Hugo, Wildberger, Joachim E., ten Cate-Hoek, Arina J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9213279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35347362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08599-5
_version_ 1784730806485254144
author Arnoldussen, Carsten W. K. P.
Notten, Pascale
Brans, Rutger
Vroegindeweij, Dammis
Tick, Lidwine W.
van de Poel, Marlène H. W.
Wikkeling, Otmar R. M.
Vleming, Louis-Jean
Koster, Ad
Jie, Kon-Siong G.
Jacobs, Esther M. G.
Planken, Nils
Wittens, Cees H. A.
ten Cate, Hugo
Wildberger, Joachim E.
ten Cate-Hoek, Arina J.
author_facet Arnoldussen, Carsten W. K. P.
Notten, Pascale
Brans, Rutger
Vroegindeweij, Dammis
Tick, Lidwine W.
van de Poel, Marlène H. W.
Wikkeling, Otmar R. M.
Vleming, Louis-Jean
Koster, Ad
Jie, Kon-Siong G.
Jacobs, Esther M. G.
Planken, Nils
Wittens, Cees H. A.
ten Cate, Hugo
Wildberger, Joachim E.
ten Cate-Hoek, Arina J.
author_sort Arnoldussen, Carsten W. K. P.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance venography (MRV) is underutilized in the evaluation of thrombus properties prior to endovascular treatment but may improve procedural outcomes. We therefore investigated the clinical impact of using a dedicated MRV scoring system to assess thrombus characteristics prior to endovascular intervention for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of data from the CAVA trial (Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT00970619). MRV studies of patients receiving ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for iliofemoral DVT were reviewed. Thrombus age-related imaging characteristics were scored and translated into an overall score (acute, subacute, or old). MRV scores were compared to patient-reported complaints. MRV-scored groups were compared for CDT duration and success rate. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (29 men; age 50.8 ± 16.4 years) were included. Using MRV, 27 thrombi were classified acute, 17 subacute, and 12 old. Based on patient-reported complaints, 11 (91.7%) of these old thrombi would have been categorized acute or subacute, and one (3.7%) of the acute thrombi as old. Average duration of CDT to > 90% restored patency differed significantly between groups (p < 0.0001): average duration was 23 h for acute thromboses (range: 19–25), 43 h for subacute (range: 41–62), and 85 h for old thromboses (range: 74–96). CDT was almost eleven times more successful in thromboses characterized as acute and subacute compared to old thromboses (OR: 10.7; 95% CI 2.1–55.5). CONCLUSION: A dedicated MRV scoring system can safely discriminate between acute, subacute, and old thromboses. MRV-based selection is predictive of procedural duration and success rate and can help avoid unnecessary complications. KEY POINTS: • Thrombus age, characterized by MRV as acute, subacute, and old, can predict CDT duration and probability of success. • Accurate pre-interventional MRV-based thrombus aging has the potential to facilitate identification of eligible patients and may thus prevent CDT-related complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9213279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92132792022-06-23 Clinical impact of assessing thrombus age using magnetic resonance venography prior to catheter-directed thrombolysis Arnoldussen, Carsten W. K. P. Notten, Pascale Brans, Rutger Vroegindeweij, Dammis Tick, Lidwine W. van de Poel, Marlène H. W. Wikkeling, Otmar R. M. Vleming, Louis-Jean Koster, Ad Jie, Kon-Siong G. Jacobs, Esther M. G. Planken, Nils Wittens, Cees H. A. ten Cate, Hugo Wildberger, Joachim E. ten Cate-Hoek, Arina J. Eur Radiol Magnetic Resonance OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance venography (MRV) is underutilized in the evaluation of thrombus properties prior to endovascular treatment but may improve procedural outcomes. We therefore investigated the clinical impact of using a dedicated MRV scoring system to assess thrombus characteristics prior to endovascular intervention for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of data from the CAVA trial (Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT00970619). MRV studies of patients receiving ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for iliofemoral DVT were reviewed. Thrombus age-related imaging characteristics were scored and translated into an overall score (acute, subacute, or old). MRV scores were compared to patient-reported complaints. MRV-scored groups were compared for CDT duration and success rate. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (29 men; age 50.8 ± 16.4 years) were included. Using MRV, 27 thrombi were classified acute, 17 subacute, and 12 old. Based on patient-reported complaints, 11 (91.7%) of these old thrombi would have been categorized acute or subacute, and one (3.7%) of the acute thrombi as old. Average duration of CDT to > 90% restored patency differed significantly between groups (p < 0.0001): average duration was 23 h for acute thromboses (range: 19–25), 43 h for subacute (range: 41–62), and 85 h for old thromboses (range: 74–96). CDT was almost eleven times more successful in thromboses characterized as acute and subacute compared to old thromboses (OR: 10.7; 95% CI 2.1–55.5). CONCLUSION: A dedicated MRV scoring system can safely discriminate between acute, subacute, and old thromboses. MRV-based selection is predictive of procedural duration and success rate and can help avoid unnecessary complications. KEY POINTS: • Thrombus age, characterized by MRV as acute, subacute, and old, can predict CDT duration and probability of success. • Accurate pre-interventional MRV-based thrombus aging has the potential to facilitate identification of eligible patients and may thus prevent CDT-related complications. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-28 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9213279/ /pubmed/35347362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08599-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Magnetic Resonance
Arnoldussen, Carsten W. K. P.
Notten, Pascale
Brans, Rutger
Vroegindeweij, Dammis
Tick, Lidwine W.
van de Poel, Marlène H. W.
Wikkeling, Otmar R. M.
Vleming, Louis-Jean
Koster, Ad
Jie, Kon-Siong G.
Jacobs, Esther M. G.
Planken, Nils
Wittens, Cees H. A.
ten Cate, Hugo
Wildberger, Joachim E.
ten Cate-Hoek, Arina J.
Clinical impact of assessing thrombus age using magnetic resonance venography prior to catheter-directed thrombolysis
title Clinical impact of assessing thrombus age using magnetic resonance venography prior to catheter-directed thrombolysis
title_full Clinical impact of assessing thrombus age using magnetic resonance venography prior to catheter-directed thrombolysis
title_fullStr Clinical impact of assessing thrombus age using magnetic resonance venography prior to catheter-directed thrombolysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical impact of assessing thrombus age using magnetic resonance venography prior to catheter-directed thrombolysis
title_short Clinical impact of assessing thrombus age using magnetic resonance venography prior to catheter-directed thrombolysis
title_sort clinical impact of assessing thrombus age using magnetic resonance venography prior to catheter-directed thrombolysis
topic Magnetic Resonance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9213279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35347362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08599-5
work_keys_str_mv AT arnoldussencarstenwkp clinicalimpactofassessingthrombusageusingmagneticresonancevenographypriortocatheterdirectedthrombolysis
AT nottenpascale clinicalimpactofassessingthrombusageusingmagneticresonancevenographypriortocatheterdirectedthrombolysis
AT bransrutger clinicalimpactofassessingthrombusageusingmagneticresonancevenographypriortocatheterdirectedthrombolysis
AT vroegindeweijdammis clinicalimpactofassessingthrombusageusingmagneticresonancevenographypriortocatheterdirectedthrombolysis
AT ticklidwinew clinicalimpactofassessingthrombusageusingmagneticresonancevenographypriortocatheterdirectedthrombolysis
AT vandepoelmarlenehw clinicalimpactofassessingthrombusageusingmagneticresonancevenographypriortocatheterdirectedthrombolysis
AT wikkelingotmarrm clinicalimpactofassessingthrombusageusingmagneticresonancevenographypriortocatheterdirectedthrombolysis
AT vleminglouisjean clinicalimpactofassessingthrombusageusingmagneticresonancevenographypriortocatheterdirectedthrombolysis
AT kosterad clinicalimpactofassessingthrombusageusingmagneticresonancevenographypriortocatheterdirectedthrombolysis
AT jiekonsiongg clinicalimpactofassessingthrombusageusingmagneticresonancevenographypriortocatheterdirectedthrombolysis
AT jacobsesthermg clinicalimpactofassessingthrombusageusingmagneticresonancevenographypriortocatheterdirectedthrombolysis
AT plankennils clinicalimpactofassessingthrombusageusingmagneticresonancevenographypriortocatheterdirectedthrombolysis
AT wittensceesha clinicalimpactofassessingthrombusageusingmagneticresonancevenographypriortocatheterdirectedthrombolysis
AT tencatehugo clinicalimpactofassessingthrombusageusingmagneticresonancevenographypriortocatheterdirectedthrombolysis
AT wildbergerjoachime clinicalimpactofassessingthrombusageusingmagneticresonancevenographypriortocatheterdirectedthrombolysis
AT tencatehoekarinaj clinicalimpactofassessingthrombusageusingmagneticresonancevenographypriortocatheterdirectedthrombolysis