Cargando…
Can thromboprophylaxis build a link for cancer patients undergoing surgical and/or chemotherapy treatment? The MeTHOS cohort study
BACKGROUND: Patients with active cancer have a 4–sevenfold increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) especially during systematic anticancer treatment. Simultaneously, surgery is an additional risk factor. METHODS: The Metaxas’s Hospital THromboprophylaxis program in Oncological & Surgical...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9213358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35552827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07096-1 |
_version_ | 1784730825318727680 |
---|---|
author | Xynogalos, Spyridon Simeonidis, David Papageorgiou, George Pouliakis, Abraham Charalambakis, Nikolaos Lianos, Evangelos Mazlimoglou, Evridiki Liatsos, Alexandros-Nikolaos Kosmas, Christos Ziras, Nicolaos |
author_facet | Xynogalos, Spyridon Simeonidis, David Papageorgiou, George Pouliakis, Abraham Charalambakis, Nikolaos Lianos, Evangelos Mazlimoglou, Evridiki Liatsos, Alexandros-Nikolaos Kosmas, Christos Ziras, Nicolaos |
author_sort | Xynogalos, Spyridon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients with active cancer have a 4–sevenfold increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) especially during systematic anticancer treatment. Simultaneously, surgery is an additional risk factor. METHODS: The Metaxas’s Hospital THromboprophylaxis program in Oncological & Surgical Patients (MeTHOS) is a prospective, phase IV, observational, non-interventional cohort study, aiming to record the thromboprophylaxis practice patterns in high-risk active cancer patients undergoing surgical and/or chemotherapy treatment. RESULTS: We are reporting results from 291 ambulatory patients (median age: 67 years, Q1–Q3: 59–73 years, 54.6% males) who received anti-neoplastic treatment and administered thromboprophylaxis. 59.8% had cardiovascular disease (mostly hypertension), 76.6% were reported as having at least one comorbidity, while 27.5% and 15.8% accumulated two and three comorbidities, respectively. 94.9% of the patients were receiving highly thrombogenic agents such as platinum-based agents, 5-FU, immunotherapy, antiangiogenics/anti-VEGF, or erythropoietin. 26.5% of the patients were initially surgically treated. In terms of anticoagulation, all patients were treated with tinzaparin (fixed dose, 10,000 Anti-Xa IU, OD). The median anticoagulation duration was 6.2 months. Six thrombotic events were observed (2.06%, 95% CI: 0.76–4.43%): 5 were DVT, and one PE. With respect to safety, 7 bleeding events occurred (2.6%, 95% CI: 1.0–5.3%); 6 of them were minor. CONCLUSIONS: Thromboprophylaxis with LMWH in patients with active cancer and high thrombotic burden was safe and effective. Intermediate dose of tinzaparin seems to be an appropriate agent for cancer-associated thromboprophylaxis management. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04248348. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9213358 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92133582022-06-23 Can thromboprophylaxis build a link for cancer patients undergoing surgical and/or chemotherapy treatment? The MeTHOS cohort study Xynogalos, Spyridon Simeonidis, David Papageorgiou, George Pouliakis, Abraham Charalambakis, Nikolaos Lianos, Evangelos Mazlimoglou, Evridiki Liatsos, Alexandros-Nikolaos Kosmas, Christos Ziras, Nicolaos Support Care Cancer Original Article BACKGROUND: Patients with active cancer have a 4–sevenfold increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) especially during systematic anticancer treatment. Simultaneously, surgery is an additional risk factor. METHODS: The Metaxas’s Hospital THromboprophylaxis program in Oncological & Surgical Patients (MeTHOS) is a prospective, phase IV, observational, non-interventional cohort study, aiming to record the thromboprophylaxis practice patterns in high-risk active cancer patients undergoing surgical and/or chemotherapy treatment. RESULTS: We are reporting results from 291 ambulatory patients (median age: 67 years, Q1–Q3: 59–73 years, 54.6% males) who received anti-neoplastic treatment and administered thromboprophylaxis. 59.8% had cardiovascular disease (mostly hypertension), 76.6% were reported as having at least one comorbidity, while 27.5% and 15.8% accumulated two and three comorbidities, respectively. 94.9% of the patients were receiving highly thrombogenic agents such as platinum-based agents, 5-FU, immunotherapy, antiangiogenics/anti-VEGF, or erythropoietin. 26.5% of the patients were initially surgically treated. In terms of anticoagulation, all patients were treated with tinzaparin (fixed dose, 10,000 Anti-Xa IU, OD). The median anticoagulation duration was 6.2 months. Six thrombotic events were observed (2.06%, 95% CI: 0.76–4.43%): 5 were DVT, and one PE. With respect to safety, 7 bleeding events occurred (2.6%, 95% CI: 1.0–5.3%); 6 of them were minor. CONCLUSIONS: Thromboprophylaxis with LMWH in patients with active cancer and high thrombotic burden was safe and effective. Intermediate dose of tinzaparin seems to be an appropriate agent for cancer-associated thromboprophylaxis management. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04248348. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-05-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9213358/ /pubmed/35552827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07096-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Xynogalos, Spyridon Simeonidis, David Papageorgiou, George Pouliakis, Abraham Charalambakis, Nikolaos Lianos, Evangelos Mazlimoglou, Evridiki Liatsos, Alexandros-Nikolaos Kosmas, Christos Ziras, Nicolaos Can thromboprophylaxis build a link for cancer patients undergoing surgical and/or chemotherapy treatment? The MeTHOS cohort study |
title | Can thromboprophylaxis build a link for cancer patients undergoing surgical and/or chemotherapy treatment? The MeTHOS cohort study |
title_full | Can thromboprophylaxis build a link for cancer patients undergoing surgical and/or chemotherapy treatment? The MeTHOS cohort study |
title_fullStr | Can thromboprophylaxis build a link for cancer patients undergoing surgical and/or chemotherapy treatment? The MeTHOS cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Can thromboprophylaxis build a link for cancer patients undergoing surgical and/or chemotherapy treatment? The MeTHOS cohort study |
title_short | Can thromboprophylaxis build a link for cancer patients undergoing surgical and/or chemotherapy treatment? The MeTHOS cohort study |
title_sort | can thromboprophylaxis build a link for cancer patients undergoing surgical and/or chemotherapy treatment? the methos cohort study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9213358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35552827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07096-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xynogalosspyridon canthromboprophylaxisbuildalinkforcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicalandorchemotherapytreatmentthemethoscohortstudy AT simeonidisdavid canthromboprophylaxisbuildalinkforcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicalandorchemotherapytreatmentthemethoscohortstudy AT papageorgiougeorge canthromboprophylaxisbuildalinkforcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicalandorchemotherapytreatmentthemethoscohortstudy AT pouliakisabraham canthromboprophylaxisbuildalinkforcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicalandorchemotherapytreatmentthemethoscohortstudy AT charalambakisnikolaos canthromboprophylaxisbuildalinkforcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicalandorchemotherapytreatmentthemethoscohortstudy AT lianosevangelos canthromboprophylaxisbuildalinkforcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicalandorchemotherapytreatmentthemethoscohortstudy AT mazlimoglouevridiki canthromboprophylaxisbuildalinkforcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicalandorchemotherapytreatmentthemethoscohortstudy AT liatsosalexandrosnikolaos canthromboprophylaxisbuildalinkforcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicalandorchemotherapytreatmentthemethoscohortstudy AT kosmaschristos canthromboprophylaxisbuildalinkforcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicalandorchemotherapytreatmentthemethoscohortstudy AT zirasnicolaos canthromboprophylaxisbuildalinkforcancerpatientsundergoingsurgicalandorchemotherapytreatmentthemethoscohortstudy |