Cargando…

Assessment of image quality on color fundus retinal images using the automatic retinal image analysis

Image quality assessment is essential for retinopathy detection on color fundus retinal image. However, most studies focused on the classification of good and poor quality without considering the different types of poor quality. This study developed an automatic retinal image analysis (ARIA) method,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Chuying, Lee, Jack, Wang, Gechun, Dou, Xinyan, Yuan, Fei, Zee, Benny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9213403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35729197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13919-2
_version_ 1784730835385057280
author Shi, Chuying
Lee, Jack
Wang, Gechun
Dou, Xinyan
Yuan, Fei
Zee, Benny
author_facet Shi, Chuying
Lee, Jack
Wang, Gechun
Dou, Xinyan
Yuan, Fei
Zee, Benny
author_sort Shi, Chuying
collection PubMed
description Image quality assessment is essential for retinopathy detection on color fundus retinal image. However, most studies focused on the classification of good and poor quality without considering the different types of poor quality. This study developed an automatic retinal image analysis (ARIA) method, incorporating transfer net ResNet50 deep network with the automatic features generation approach to automatically assess image quality, and distinguish eye-abnormality-associated-poor-quality from artefact-associated-poor-quality on color fundus retinal images. A total of 2434 retinal images, including 1439 good quality and 995 poor quality (483 eye-abnormality-associated-poor-quality and 512 artefact-associated-poor-quality), were used for training, testing, and 10-ford cross-validation. We also analyzed the external validation with the clinical diagnosis of eye abnormality as the reference standard to evaluate the performance of the method. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for testing good quality against poor quality were 98.0%, 99.1%, and 98.6%, and for differentiating between eye-abnormality-associated-poor-quality and artefact-associated-poor-quality were 92.2%, 93.8%, and 93.0%, respectively. In external validation, our method achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.997 for the overall quality classification and 0.915 for the classification of two types of poor quality. The proposed approach, ARIA, showed good performance in testing, 10-fold cross validation and external validation. This study provides a novel angle for image quality screening based on the different poor quality types and corresponding dealing methods. It suggested that the ARIA can be used as a screening tool in the preliminary stage of retinopathy grading by telemedicine or artificial intelligence analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9213403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92134032022-06-23 Assessment of image quality on color fundus retinal images using the automatic retinal image analysis Shi, Chuying Lee, Jack Wang, Gechun Dou, Xinyan Yuan, Fei Zee, Benny Sci Rep Article Image quality assessment is essential for retinopathy detection on color fundus retinal image. However, most studies focused on the classification of good and poor quality without considering the different types of poor quality. This study developed an automatic retinal image analysis (ARIA) method, incorporating transfer net ResNet50 deep network with the automatic features generation approach to automatically assess image quality, and distinguish eye-abnormality-associated-poor-quality from artefact-associated-poor-quality on color fundus retinal images. A total of 2434 retinal images, including 1439 good quality and 995 poor quality (483 eye-abnormality-associated-poor-quality and 512 artefact-associated-poor-quality), were used for training, testing, and 10-ford cross-validation. We also analyzed the external validation with the clinical diagnosis of eye abnormality as the reference standard to evaluate the performance of the method. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for testing good quality against poor quality were 98.0%, 99.1%, and 98.6%, and for differentiating between eye-abnormality-associated-poor-quality and artefact-associated-poor-quality were 92.2%, 93.8%, and 93.0%, respectively. In external validation, our method achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.997 for the overall quality classification and 0.915 for the classification of two types of poor quality. The proposed approach, ARIA, showed good performance in testing, 10-fold cross validation and external validation. This study provides a novel angle for image quality screening based on the different poor quality types and corresponding dealing methods. It suggested that the ARIA can be used as a screening tool in the preliminary stage of retinopathy grading by telemedicine or artificial intelligence analysis. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9213403/ /pubmed/35729197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13919-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Shi, Chuying
Lee, Jack
Wang, Gechun
Dou, Xinyan
Yuan, Fei
Zee, Benny
Assessment of image quality on color fundus retinal images using the automatic retinal image analysis
title Assessment of image quality on color fundus retinal images using the automatic retinal image analysis
title_full Assessment of image quality on color fundus retinal images using the automatic retinal image analysis
title_fullStr Assessment of image quality on color fundus retinal images using the automatic retinal image analysis
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of image quality on color fundus retinal images using the automatic retinal image analysis
title_short Assessment of image quality on color fundus retinal images using the automatic retinal image analysis
title_sort assessment of image quality on color fundus retinal images using the automatic retinal image analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9213403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35729197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13919-2
work_keys_str_mv AT shichuying assessmentofimagequalityoncolorfundusretinalimagesusingtheautomaticretinalimageanalysis
AT leejack assessmentofimagequalityoncolorfundusretinalimagesusingtheautomaticretinalimageanalysis
AT wanggechun assessmentofimagequalityoncolorfundusretinalimagesusingtheautomaticretinalimageanalysis
AT douxinyan assessmentofimagequalityoncolorfundusretinalimagesusingtheautomaticretinalimageanalysis
AT yuanfei assessmentofimagequalityoncolorfundusretinalimagesusingtheautomaticretinalimageanalysis
AT zeebenny assessmentofimagequalityoncolorfundusretinalimagesusingtheautomaticretinalimageanalysis