Cargando…
Asset-Based, Sustainable Local Economic Development: Using Community Participation to Improve Quality of Life Across Rural, Small-Town, and Urban Communities
We analyze survey data from 5,487 residents of 85 Texas communities, including rural communities, small towns, medium-sized cities, and the five largest urban centers, to model the influence of the degree of urbanity and rurality of a community as well as residents’ social position, values, and thei...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9213640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35756429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11482-022-10051-1 |
_version_ | 1784730878935564288 |
---|---|
author | Kammer-Kerwick, Matt Takasaki, Kara Kellison, J. Bruce Sternberg, Jeff |
author_facet | Kammer-Kerwick, Matt Takasaki, Kara Kellison, J. Bruce Sternberg, Jeff |
author_sort | Kammer-Kerwick, Matt |
collection | PubMed |
description | We analyze survey data from 5,487 residents of 85 Texas communities, including rural communities, small towns, medium-sized cities, and the five largest urban centers, to model the influence of the degree of urbanity and rurality of a community as well as residents’ social position, values, and their satisfaction with local assets. The paper’s central argument is that a wide range of factors impact how community members think about their needs and thus should be considered in any community development process. This human-centered approach looks at how community specific factors impact economic and quality-of-life development project preferences in support of adapting community development decision-making processes according to the context of each community. For the sake of parsimony, this paper presents results for three community development project concepts: (1) renovating some downtown buildings as mixed-use facilities with retail shops and apartments, (2) opening a community health center, and (3) deploying gigabit high-speed fiber broadband internet in the downtown area. Our findings specifically highlight areas where participatory processes can be introduced to guide further interactions between experts and community members to (1) identify groups in the community to bring into the process who may be most impacted by the choice of one intervention over another, and (2) target areas where further community discussion and deliberation is necessary around which community dialogues (round tables, town halls, workshops, etc.) could be facilitated. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11482-022-10051-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9213640 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92136402022-06-22 Asset-Based, Sustainable Local Economic Development: Using Community Participation to Improve Quality of Life Across Rural, Small-Town, and Urban Communities Kammer-Kerwick, Matt Takasaki, Kara Kellison, J. Bruce Sternberg, Jeff Appl Res Qual Life Article We analyze survey data from 5,487 residents of 85 Texas communities, including rural communities, small towns, medium-sized cities, and the five largest urban centers, to model the influence of the degree of urbanity and rurality of a community as well as residents’ social position, values, and their satisfaction with local assets. The paper’s central argument is that a wide range of factors impact how community members think about their needs and thus should be considered in any community development process. This human-centered approach looks at how community specific factors impact economic and quality-of-life development project preferences in support of adapting community development decision-making processes according to the context of each community. For the sake of parsimony, this paper presents results for three community development project concepts: (1) renovating some downtown buildings as mixed-use facilities with retail shops and apartments, (2) opening a community health center, and (3) deploying gigabit high-speed fiber broadband internet in the downtown area. Our findings specifically highlight areas where participatory processes can be introduced to guide further interactions between experts and community members to (1) identify groups in the community to bring into the process who may be most impacted by the choice of one intervention over another, and (2) target areas where further community discussion and deliberation is necessary around which community dialogues (round tables, town halls, workshops, etc.) could be facilitated. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11482-022-10051-1. Springer Netherlands 2022-06-22 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9213640/ /pubmed/35756429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11482-022-10051-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Kammer-Kerwick, Matt Takasaki, Kara Kellison, J. Bruce Sternberg, Jeff Asset-Based, Sustainable Local Economic Development: Using Community Participation to Improve Quality of Life Across Rural, Small-Town, and Urban Communities |
title | Asset-Based, Sustainable Local Economic Development: Using Community Participation to Improve Quality of Life Across Rural, Small-Town, and Urban Communities |
title_full | Asset-Based, Sustainable Local Economic Development: Using Community Participation to Improve Quality of Life Across Rural, Small-Town, and Urban Communities |
title_fullStr | Asset-Based, Sustainable Local Economic Development: Using Community Participation to Improve Quality of Life Across Rural, Small-Town, and Urban Communities |
title_full_unstemmed | Asset-Based, Sustainable Local Economic Development: Using Community Participation to Improve Quality of Life Across Rural, Small-Town, and Urban Communities |
title_short | Asset-Based, Sustainable Local Economic Development: Using Community Participation to Improve Quality of Life Across Rural, Small-Town, and Urban Communities |
title_sort | asset-based, sustainable local economic development: using community participation to improve quality of life across rural, small-town, and urban communities |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9213640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35756429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11482-022-10051-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kammerkerwickmatt assetbasedsustainablelocaleconomicdevelopmentusingcommunityparticipationtoimprovequalityoflifeacrossruralsmalltownandurbancommunities AT takasakikara assetbasedsustainablelocaleconomicdevelopmentusingcommunityparticipationtoimprovequalityoflifeacrossruralsmalltownandurbancommunities AT kellisonjbruce assetbasedsustainablelocaleconomicdevelopmentusingcommunityparticipationtoimprovequalityoflifeacrossruralsmalltownandurbancommunities AT sternbergjeff assetbasedsustainablelocaleconomicdevelopmentusingcommunityparticipationtoimprovequalityoflifeacrossruralsmalltownandurbancommunities |