Cargando…

Asset-Based, Sustainable Local Economic Development: Using Community Participation to Improve Quality of Life Across Rural, Small-Town, and Urban Communities

We analyze survey data from 5,487 residents of 85 Texas communities, including rural communities, small towns, medium-sized cities, and the five largest urban centers, to model the influence of the degree of urbanity and rurality of a community as well as residents’ social position, values, and thei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kammer-Kerwick, Matt, Takasaki, Kara, Kellison, J. Bruce, Sternberg, Jeff
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9213640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35756429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11482-022-10051-1
_version_ 1784730878935564288
author Kammer-Kerwick, Matt
Takasaki, Kara
Kellison, J. Bruce
Sternberg, Jeff
author_facet Kammer-Kerwick, Matt
Takasaki, Kara
Kellison, J. Bruce
Sternberg, Jeff
author_sort Kammer-Kerwick, Matt
collection PubMed
description We analyze survey data from 5,487 residents of 85 Texas communities, including rural communities, small towns, medium-sized cities, and the five largest urban centers, to model the influence of the degree of urbanity and rurality of a community as well as residents’ social position, values, and their satisfaction with local assets. The paper’s central argument is that a wide range of factors impact how community members think about their needs and thus should be considered in any community development process. This human-centered approach looks at how community specific factors impact economic and quality-of-life development project preferences in support of adapting community development decision-making processes according to the context of each community. For the sake of parsimony, this paper presents results for three community development project concepts: (1) renovating some downtown buildings as mixed-use facilities with retail shops and apartments, (2) opening a community health center, and (3) deploying gigabit high-speed fiber broadband internet in the downtown area. Our findings specifically highlight areas where participatory processes can be introduced to guide further interactions between experts and community members to (1) identify groups in the community to bring into the process who may be most impacted by the choice of one intervention over another, and (2) target areas where further community discussion and deliberation is necessary around which community dialogues (round tables, town halls, workshops, etc.) could be facilitated. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11482-022-10051-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9213640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92136402022-06-22 Asset-Based, Sustainable Local Economic Development: Using Community Participation to Improve Quality of Life Across Rural, Small-Town, and Urban Communities Kammer-Kerwick, Matt Takasaki, Kara Kellison, J. Bruce Sternberg, Jeff Appl Res Qual Life Article We analyze survey data from 5,487 residents of 85 Texas communities, including rural communities, small towns, medium-sized cities, and the five largest urban centers, to model the influence of the degree of urbanity and rurality of a community as well as residents’ social position, values, and their satisfaction with local assets. The paper’s central argument is that a wide range of factors impact how community members think about their needs and thus should be considered in any community development process. This human-centered approach looks at how community specific factors impact economic and quality-of-life development project preferences in support of adapting community development decision-making processes according to the context of each community. For the sake of parsimony, this paper presents results for three community development project concepts: (1) renovating some downtown buildings as mixed-use facilities with retail shops and apartments, (2) opening a community health center, and (3) deploying gigabit high-speed fiber broadband internet in the downtown area. Our findings specifically highlight areas where participatory processes can be introduced to guide further interactions between experts and community members to (1) identify groups in the community to bring into the process who may be most impacted by the choice of one intervention over another, and (2) target areas where further community discussion and deliberation is necessary around which community dialogues (round tables, town halls, workshops, etc.) could be facilitated. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11482-022-10051-1. Springer Netherlands 2022-06-22 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9213640/ /pubmed/35756429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11482-022-10051-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kammer-Kerwick, Matt
Takasaki, Kara
Kellison, J. Bruce
Sternberg, Jeff
Asset-Based, Sustainable Local Economic Development: Using Community Participation to Improve Quality of Life Across Rural, Small-Town, and Urban Communities
title Asset-Based, Sustainable Local Economic Development: Using Community Participation to Improve Quality of Life Across Rural, Small-Town, and Urban Communities
title_full Asset-Based, Sustainable Local Economic Development: Using Community Participation to Improve Quality of Life Across Rural, Small-Town, and Urban Communities
title_fullStr Asset-Based, Sustainable Local Economic Development: Using Community Participation to Improve Quality of Life Across Rural, Small-Town, and Urban Communities
title_full_unstemmed Asset-Based, Sustainable Local Economic Development: Using Community Participation to Improve Quality of Life Across Rural, Small-Town, and Urban Communities
title_short Asset-Based, Sustainable Local Economic Development: Using Community Participation to Improve Quality of Life Across Rural, Small-Town, and Urban Communities
title_sort asset-based, sustainable local economic development: using community participation to improve quality of life across rural, small-town, and urban communities
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9213640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35756429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11482-022-10051-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kammerkerwickmatt assetbasedsustainablelocaleconomicdevelopmentusingcommunityparticipationtoimprovequalityoflifeacrossruralsmalltownandurbancommunities
AT takasakikara assetbasedsustainablelocaleconomicdevelopmentusingcommunityparticipationtoimprovequalityoflifeacrossruralsmalltownandurbancommunities
AT kellisonjbruce assetbasedsustainablelocaleconomicdevelopmentusingcommunityparticipationtoimprovequalityoflifeacrossruralsmalltownandurbancommunities
AT sternbergjeff assetbasedsustainablelocaleconomicdevelopmentusingcommunityparticipationtoimprovequalityoflifeacrossruralsmalltownandurbancommunities