Cargando…

Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy to Three or More Contiguous Vertebral Levels

BACKGROUND: With survival improving in many metastatic malignancies, spine metastases have increasingly become a source of significant morbidity; achieving durable local control (LC) is critical. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may offer improved LC and/or symptom palliation. However, due to s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dibs, Khaled, Blakaj, Dukagjin M., Prasad, Rahul N., Olausson, Alexander, Bourekas, Eric C., Boulter, Daniel, Ayan, Ahmet S., Cochran, Eric, Marras, William S., Mageswaran, Prasath, Thomas, Evan, Lee, Hyeri, Grecula, John, Raval, Raju R., Mendel, Ehud, Scharschmidt, Thomas, Lonser, Russell, Chakravarti, Arnab, Elder, James B., Palmer, Joshua D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9213679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35756685
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.912804
_version_ 1784730888612872192
author Dibs, Khaled
Blakaj, Dukagjin M.
Prasad, Rahul N.
Olausson, Alexander
Bourekas, Eric C.
Boulter, Daniel
Ayan, Ahmet S.
Cochran, Eric
Marras, William S.
Mageswaran, Prasath
Thomas, Evan
Lee, Hyeri
Grecula, John
Raval, Raju R.
Mendel, Ehud
Scharschmidt, Thomas
Lonser, Russell
Chakravarti, Arnab
Elder, James B.
Palmer, Joshua D.
author_facet Dibs, Khaled
Blakaj, Dukagjin M.
Prasad, Rahul N.
Olausson, Alexander
Bourekas, Eric C.
Boulter, Daniel
Ayan, Ahmet S.
Cochran, Eric
Marras, William S.
Mageswaran, Prasath
Thomas, Evan
Lee, Hyeri
Grecula, John
Raval, Raju R.
Mendel, Ehud
Scharschmidt, Thomas
Lonser, Russell
Chakravarti, Arnab
Elder, James B.
Palmer, Joshua D.
author_sort Dibs, Khaled
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With survival improving in many metastatic malignancies, spine metastases have increasingly become a source of significant morbidity; achieving durable local control (LC) is critical. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may offer improved LC and/or symptom palliation. However, due to setup concerns, SBRT is infrequently offered to patients with ≥3 contiguous involved levels. Because data are limited, we sought to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and cancer control outcomes of spine SBRT delivered to ≥3 contiguous levels. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all SBRT courses delivered between 2013 and 2019 at a tertiary care institution for postoperative or intact spine metastases. Radiotherapy was delivered to 14–35 Gy in 1–5 fractions. Patients were stratified by whether they received SBRT to 1–2 or ≥3 contiguous levels. The primary endpoint was 1-year LC and was compared between groups. Factors associated with increased likelihood of local failure (LF) were explored. Acute and chronic toxicity was assessed. In-depth dosimetric data were collected. RESULTS: Overall, 165 patients with 194 SBRT courses were identified [54% were men, median age was 61 years, 93% had Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥70, and median follow-up was 15 months]. One hundred thirteen patients (68%) received treatment to 1–2 and 52 to 3–7 (32%) levels. The 1-year LC was 88% (89% for 1–2 levels vs. 84% for ≥3 levels, p = 0.747). On multivariate analysis, uncontrolled systemic disease was associated with inferior LC for patients with ≥3 treated levels. No other demographic, disease, treatment, or dosimetric variables achieved significance. Rates of new/progressive fracture were equivalent (8% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.839). There were no radiation-induced myelopathy or grade 3+ acute or late toxicities in either group. Coverage of ≥95% of the planning target volume with ≥95% prescription dose was similar between groups (96% 1–2 levels vs. 89% ≥3 levels, p = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with ≥3 contiguous involved levels, spine SBRT is feasible and may offer excellent LC without significant toxicity. Prospective evaluation is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9213679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92136792022-06-23 Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy to Three or More Contiguous Vertebral Levels Dibs, Khaled Blakaj, Dukagjin M. Prasad, Rahul N. Olausson, Alexander Bourekas, Eric C. Boulter, Daniel Ayan, Ahmet S. Cochran, Eric Marras, William S. Mageswaran, Prasath Thomas, Evan Lee, Hyeri Grecula, John Raval, Raju R. Mendel, Ehud Scharschmidt, Thomas Lonser, Russell Chakravarti, Arnab Elder, James B. Palmer, Joshua D. Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: With survival improving in many metastatic malignancies, spine metastases have increasingly become a source of significant morbidity; achieving durable local control (LC) is critical. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may offer improved LC and/or symptom palliation. However, due to setup concerns, SBRT is infrequently offered to patients with ≥3 contiguous involved levels. Because data are limited, we sought to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and cancer control outcomes of spine SBRT delivered to ≥3 contiguous levels. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all SBRT courses delivered between 2013 and 2019 at a tertiary care institution for postoperative or intact spine metastases. Radiotherapy was delivered to 14–35 Gy in 1–5 fractions. Patients were stratified by whether they received SBRT to 1–2 or ≥3 contiguous levels. The primary endpoint was 1-year LC and was compared between groups. Factors associated with increased likelihood of local failure (LF) were explored. Acute and chronic toxicity was assessed. In-depth dosimetric data were collected. RESULTS: Overall, 165 patients with 194 SBRT courses were identified [54% were men, median age was 61 years, 93% had Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥70, and median follow-up was 15 months]. One hundred thirteen patients (68%) received treatment to 1–2 and 52 to 3–7 (32%) levels. The 1-year LC was 88% (89% for 1–2 levels vs. 84% for ≥3 levels, p = 0.747). On multivariate analysis, uncontrolled systemic disease was associated with inferior LC for patients with ≥3 treated levels. No other demographic, disease, treatment, or dosimetric variables achieved significance. Rates of new/progressive fracture were equivalent (8% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.839). There were no radiation-induced myelopathy or grade 3+ acute or late toxicities in either group. Coverage of ≥95% of the planning target volume with ≥95% prescription dose was similar between groups (96% 1–2 levels vs. 89% ≥3 levels, p = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with ≥3 contiguous involved levels, spine SBRT is feasible and may offer excellent LC without significant toxicity. Prospective evaluation is warranted. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9213679/ /pubmed/35756685 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.912804 Text en Copyright © 2022 Dibs, Blakaj, Prasad, Olausson, Bourekas, Boulter, Ayan, Cochran, Marras, Mageswaran, Thomas, Lee, Grecula, Raval, Mendel, Scharschmidt, Lonser, Chakravarti, Elder and Palmer https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Dibs, Khaled
Blakaj, Dukagjin M.
Prasad, Rahul N.
Olausson, Alexander
Bourekas, Eric C.
Boulter, Daniel
Ayan, Ahmet S.
Cochran, Eric
Marras, William S.
Mageswaran, Prasath
Thomas, Evan
Lee, Hyeri
Grecula, John
Raval, Raju R.
Mendel, Ehud
Scharschmidt, Thomas
Lonser, Russell
Chakravarti, Arnab
Elder, James B.
Palmer, Joshua D.
Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy to Three or More Contiguous Vertebral Levels
title Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy to Three or More Contiguous Vertebral Levels
title_full Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy to Three or More Contiguous Vertebral Levels
title_fullStr Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy to Three or More Contiguous Vertebral Levels
title_full_unstemmed Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy to Three or More Contiguous Vertebral Levels
title_short Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy to Three or More Contiguous Vertebral Levels
title_sort spine stereotactic body radiotherapy to three or more contiguous vertebral levels
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9213679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35756685
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.912804
work_keys_str_mv AT dibskhaled spinestereotacticbodyradiotherapytothreeormorecontiguousvertebrallevels
AT blakajdukagjinm spinestereotacticbodyradiotherapytothreeormorecontiguousvertebrallevels
AT prasadrahuln spinestereotacticbodyradiotherapytothreeormorecontiguousvertebrallevels
AT olaussonalexander spinestereotacticbodyradiotherapytothreeormorecontiguousvertebrallevels
AT bourekasericc spinestereotacticbodyradiotherapytothreeormorecontiguousvertebrallevels
AT boulterdaniel spinestereotacticbodyradiotherapytothreeormorecontiguousvertebrallevels
AT ayanahmets spinestereotacticbodyradiotherapytothreeormorecontiguousvertebrallevels
AT cochraneric spinestereotacticbodyradiotherapytothreeormorecontiguousvertebrallevels
AT marraswilliams spinestereotacticbodyradiotherapytothreeormorecontiguousvertebrallevels
AT mageswaranprasath spinestereotacticbodyradiotherapytothreeormorecontiguousvertebrallevels
AT thomasevan spinestereotacticbodyradiotherapytothreeormorecontiguousvertebrallevels
AT leehyeri spinestereotacticbodyradiotherapytothreeormorecontiguousvertebrallevels
AT greculajohn spinestereotacticbodyradiotherapytothreeormorecontiguousvertebrallevels
AT ravalrajur spinestereotacticbodyradiotherapytothreeormorecontiguousvertebrallevels
AT mendelehud spinestereotacticbodyradiotherapytothreeormorecontiguousvertebrallevels
AT scharschmidtthomas spinestereotacticbodyradiotherapytothreeormorecontiguousvertebrallevels
AT lonserrussell spinestereotacticbodyradiotherapytothreeormorecontiguousvertebrallevels
AT chakravartiarnab spinestereotacticbodyradiotherapytothreeormorecontiguousvertebrallevels
AT elderjamesb spinestereotacticbodyradiotherapytothreeormorecontiguousvertebrallevels
AT palmerjoshuad spinestereotacticbodyradiotherapytothreeormorecontiguousvertebrallevels