Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Intensified Versus Standard Prophylactic Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported inconsistent effects from intensified anticoagulation on clinical outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We performed an aggregate data meta-analysis from available trials to quantify effect on nonfatal and fatal outcomes and id...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35859991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac285 |
_version_ | 1784730951448788992 |
---|---|
author | Wills, Nicola K Nair, Nikhil Patel, Kashyap Sikder, Omaike Adriaanse, Marguerite Eikelboom, John Wasserman, Sean |
author_facet | Wills, Nicola K Nair, Nikhil Patel, Kashyap Sikder, Omaike Adriaanse, Marguerite Eikelboom, John Wasserman, Sean |
author_sort | Wills, Nicola K |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported inconsistent effects from intensified anticoagulation on clinical outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We performed an aggregate data meta-analysis from available trials to quantify effect on nonfatal and fatal outcomes and identify subgroups who may benefit. METHODS: We searched multiple databases for RCTs comparing intensified (intermediate or therapeutic dose) vs prophylactic anticoagulation in adults with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 through 19 January 2022. We used random-effects meta-analysis to estimate pooled risk ratios for mortality, thrombotic, and bleeding events (at end of follow-up or discharge) and performed subgroup analysis for clinical setting and dose of intensified anticoagulation. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs were included (N = 5873). Intensified vs prophylactic anticoagulation was not associated with a mortality reduction up to 45 days (risk ratio [RR], 0.93 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .79–1.10]). There was a possible signal of mortality reduction for non–intensive care unit (ICU) patients, although with low precision and high heterogeneity (5 studies; RR, 0.84 [95% CI, .49–1.44]; I(2) = 75%). Risk of venous thromboembolism was reduced (RR, 0.53 [95% CI, .41–.69]; I(2) = 0%), with effect driven by therapeutic rather than intermediate dosing (interaction P = .04). Major bleeding was increased with intensified anticoagulation (RR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.17–2.56]) with no interaction for dosing and clinical setting. CONCLUSIONS: Intensified anticoagulation has no effect on mortality among hospitalized adults with COVID-19 and is associated with increased bleeding risk. The observed reduction in venous thromboembolism risk and trend toward reduced mortality in non-ICU settings requires exploration in additional RCTs. Clinical Trials Registration. CRD42021273449 (PROSPERO). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9214161 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92141612022-06-22 Efficacy and Safety of Intensified Versus Standard Prophylactic Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Wills, Nicola K Nair, Nikhil Patel, Kashyap Sikder, Omaike Adriaanse, Marguerite Eikelboom, John Wasserman, Sean Open Forum Infect Dis Review Article BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported inconsistent effects from intensified anticoagulation on clinical outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We performed an aggregate data meta-analysis from available trials to quantify effect on nonfatal and fatal outcomes and identify subgroups who may benefit. METHODS: We searched multiple databases for RCTs comparing intensified (intermediate or therapeutic dose) vs prophylactic anticoagulation in adults with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 through 19 January 2022. We used random-effects meta-analysis to estimate pooled risk ratios for mortality, thrombotic, and bleeding events (at end of follow-up or discharge) and performed subgroup analysis for clinical setting and dose of intensified anticoagulation. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs were included (N = 5873). Intensified vs prophylactic anticoagulation was not associated with a mortality reduction up to 45 days (risk ratio [RR], 0.93 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .79–1.10]). There was a possible signal of mortality reduction for non–intensive care unit (ICU) patients, although with low precision and high heterogeneity (5 studies; RR, 0.84 [95% CI, .49–1.44]; I(2) = 75%). Risk of venous thromboembolism was reduced (RR, 0.53 [95% CI, .41–.69]; I(2) = 0%), with effect driven by therapeutic rather than intermediate dosing (interaction P = .04). Major bleeding was increased with intensified anticoagulation (RR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.17–2.56]) with no interaction for dosing and clinical setting. CONCLUSIONS: Intensified anticoagulation has no effect on mortality among hospitalized adults with COVID-19 and is associated with increased bleeding risk. The observed reduction in venous thromboembolism risk and trend toward reduced mortality in non-ICU settings requires exploration in additional RCTs. Clinical Trials Registration. CRD42021273449 (PROSPERO). Oxford University Press 2022-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9214161/ /pubmed/35859991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac285 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Wills, Nicola K Nair, Nikhil Patel, Kashyap Sikder, Omaike Adriaanse, Marguerite Eikelboom, John Wasserman, Sean Efficacy and Safety of Intensified Versus Standard Prophylactic Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Intensified Versus Standard Prophylactic Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Intensified Versus Standard Prophylactic Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Intensified Versus Standard Prophylactic Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Intensified Versus Standard Prophylactic Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Intensified Versus Standard Prophylactic Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of intensified versus standard prophylactic anticoagulation therapy in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35859991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac285 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT willsnicolak efficacyandsafetyofintensifiedversusstandardprophylacticanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT nairnikhil efficacyandsafetyofintensifiedversusstandardprophylacticanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT patelkashyap efficacyandsafetyofintensifiedversusstandardprophylacticanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sikderomaike efficacyandsafetyofintensifiedversusstandardprophylacticanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT adriaansemarguerite efficacyandsafetyofintensifiedversusstandardprophylacticanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT eikelboomjohn efficacyandsafetyofintensifiedversusstandardprophylacticanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wassermansean efficacyandsafetyofintensifiedversusstandardprophylacticanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |