Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Intensified Versus Standard Prophylactic Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported inconsistent effects from intensified anticoagulation on clinical outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We performed an aggregate data meta-analysis from available trials to quantify effect on nonfatal and fatal outcomes and id...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wills, Nicola K, Nair, Nikhil, Patel, Kashyap, Sikder, Omaike, Adriaanse, Marguerite, Eikelboom, John, Wasserman, Sean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35859991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac285
_version_ 1784730951448788992
author Wills, Nicola K
Nair, Nikhil
Patel, Kashyap
Sikder, Omaike
Adriaanse, Marguerite
Eikelboom, John
Wasserman, Sean
author_facet Wills, Nicola K
Nair, Nikhil
Patel, Kashyap
Sikder, Omaike
Adriaanse, Marguerite
Eikelboom, John
Wasserman, Sean
author_sort Wills, Nicola K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported inconsistent effects from intensified anticoagulation on clinical outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We performed an aggregate data meta-analysis from available trials to quantify effect on nonfatal and fatal outcomes and identify subgroups who may benefit. METHODS: We searched multiple databases for RCTs comparing intensified (intermediate or therapeutic dose) vs prophylactic anticoagulation in adults with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 through 19 January 2022. We used random-effects meta-analysis to estimate pooled risk ratios for mortality, thrombotic, and bleeding events (at end of follow-up or discharge) and performed subgroup analysis for clinical setting and dose of intensified anticoagulation. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs were included (N = 5873). Intensified vs prophylactic anticoagulation was not associated with a mortality reduction up to 45 days (risk ratio [RR], 0.93 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .79–1.10]). There was a possible signal of mortality reduction for non–intensive care unit (ICU) patients, although with low precision and high heterogeneity (5 studies; RR, 0.84 [95% CI, .49–1.44]; I(2) = 75%). Risk of venous thromboembolism was reduced (RR, 0.53 [95% CI, .41–.69]; I(2) = 0%), with effect driven by therapeutic rather than intermediate dosing (interaction P = .04). Major bleeding was increased with intensified anticoagulation (RR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.17–2.56]) with no interaction for dosing and clinical setting. CONCLUSIONS: Intensified anticoagulation has no effect on mortality among hospitalized adults with COVID-19 and is associated with increased bleeding risk. The observed reduction in venous thromboembolism risk and trend toward reduced mortality in non-ICU settings requires exploration in additional RCTs. Clinical Trials Registration. CRD42021273449 (PROSPERO).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9214161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92141612022-06-22 Efficacy and Safety of Intensified Versus Standard Prophylactic Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Wills, Nicola K Nair, Nikhil Patel, Kashyap Sikder, Omaike Adriaanse, Marguerite Eikelboom, John Wasserman, Sean Open Forum Infect Dis Review Article BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported inconsistent effects from intensified anticoagulation on clinical outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We performed an aggregate data meta-analysis from available trials to quantify effect on nonfatal and fatal outcomes and identify subgroups who may benefit. METHODS: We searched multiple databases for RCTs comparing intensified (intermediate or therapeutic dose) vs prophylactic anticoagulation in adults with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 through 19 January 2022. We used random-effects meta-analysis to estimate pooled risk ratios for mortality, thrombotic, and bleeding events (at end of follow-up or discharge) and performed subgroup analysis for clinical setting and dose of intensified anticoagulation. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs were included (N = 5873). Intensified vs prophylactic anticoagulation was not associated with a mortality reduction up to 45 days (risk ratio [RR], 0.93 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .79–1.10]). There was a possible signal of mortality reduction for non–intensive care unit (ICU) patients, although with low precision and high heterogeneity (5 studies; RR, 0.84 [95% CI, .49–1.44]; I(2) = 75%). Risk of venous thromboembolism was reduced (RR, 0.53 [95% CI, .41–.69]; I(2) = 0%), with effect driven by therapeutic rather than intermediate dosing (interaction P = .04). Major bleeding was increased with intensified anticoagulation (RR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.17–2.56]) with no interaction for dosing and clinical setting. CONCLUSIONS: Intensified anticoagulation has no effect on mortality among hospitalized adults with COVID-19 and is associated with increased bleeding risk. The observed reduction in venous thromboembolism risk and trend toward reduced mortality in non-ICU settings requires exploration in additional RCTs. Clinical Trials Registration. CRD42021273449 (PROSPERO). Oxford University Press 2022-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9214161/ /pubmed/35859991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac285 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Wills, Nicola K
Nair, Nikhil
Patel, Kashyap
Sikder, Omaike
Adriaanse, Marguerite
Eikelboom, John
Wasserman, Sean
Efficacy and Safety of Intensified Versus Standard Prophylactic Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Efficacy and Safety of Intensified Versus Standard Prophylactic Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Intensified Versus Standard Prophylactic Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Intensified Versus Standard Prophylactic Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Intensified Versus Standard Prophylactic Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Intensified Versus Standard Prophylactic Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of intensified versus standard prophylactic anticoagulation therapy in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35859991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac285
work_keys_str_mv AT willsnicolak efficacyandsafetyofintensifiedversusstandardprophylacticanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nairnikhil efficacyandsafetyofintensifiedversusstandardprophylacticanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT patelkashyap efficacyandsafetyofintensifiedversusstandardprophylacticanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sikderomaike efficacyandsafetyofintensifiedversusstandardprophylacticanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT adriaansemarguerite efficacyandsafetyofintensifiedversusstandardprophylacticanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT eikelboomjohn efficacyandsafetyofintensifiedversusstandardprophylacticanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wassermansean efficacyandsafetyofintensifiedversusstandardprophylacticanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis