Cargando…
Implications of the availability and distribution of birth weight on addressing neonatal mortality: population-based assessment from Bihar state of India
OBJECTIVE: A large proportion of neonatal deaths in India are attributable to low birth weight (LBW). We report population-based distribution and determinants of birth weight in Bihar state, and on the perceptions about birth weight among carers. DESIGN: A cross-sectional household survey in a state...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35728896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061934 |
_version_ | 1784731001066356736 |
---|---|
author | Kumar, G Anil George, Sibin Akbar, Md Bhattacharya, Debarshi Nanda, Priya Dandona, Lalit Dandona, Rakhi |
author_facet | Kumar, G Anil George, Sibin Akbar, Md Bhattacharya, Debarshi Nanda, Priya Dandona, Lalit Dandona, Rakhi |
author_sort | Kumar, G Anil |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: A large proportion of neonatal deaths in India are attributable to low birth weight (LBW). We report population-based distribution and determinants of birth weight in Bihar state, and on the perceptions about birth weight among carers. DESIGN: A cross-sectional household survey in a state representative sample of 6007 live births born in 2018–2019. Mothers provided detailed interviews on sociodemographic characteristics and birth weight, and their perceptions on LBW (birth weight <2500 g). We report on birth weight availability, LBW prevalence, neonatal mortality rate (NMR) by birth weight and perceptions of mothers on LBW implications. SETTING: Bihar state, India. PARTICIPANTS: Women with live birth between October 2018 and September 2019. RESULTS: A total of 5021 (83.5%) live births participated, and 3939 (78.4%) were weighed at birth. LBW prevalence among those with available birth weight was 18.4% (95% CI 17.1 to 19.7). Majority (87.5%) of the live births born at home were not weighed at birth. LBW prevalence decreased and birth weight ≥2500 g increased significantly with increasing wealth index quartile. NMR was significantly higher in live births weighing <1500 g (11.3%; 95% CI 5.1 to 23.1) and 1500–1999 g (8.0%; 95% CI 4.6 to 13.6) than those weighing ≥2500 g (1.3%, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.7). Assuming proportional correspondence of LBW and NMR in live births with and without birth weight, the estimated LBW among those without birth weight was 35.5% (95% CI 33.0 to 38.0) and among all live births irrespective of birth weight availability was 23.0% (95% CI 21.9 to 24.2). 70% of mothers considered LBW to be a sign of sickness, 59.5% perceived it as a risk of developing other illnesses and 8.6% as having an increased probability of death. CONCLUSIONS: Missing birth weight is substantially compromising the planning of interventions to address LBW at the population-level. Variations of LBW by place of delivery and sociodemographic indicators, and the perceptions of carers about LBW can facilitate appropriate actions to address LBW and the associated neonatal mortality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9214371 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92143712022-07-07 Implications of the availability and distribution of birth weight on addressing neonatal mortality: population-based assessment from Bihar state of India Kumar, G Anil George, Sibin Akbar, Md Bhattacharya, Debarshi Nanda, Priya Dandona, Lalit Dandona, Rakhi BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVE: A large proportion of neonatal deaths in India are attributable to low birth weight (LBW). We report population-based distribution and determinants of birth weight in Bihar state, and on the perceptions about birth weight among carers. DESIGN: A cross-sectional household survey in a state representative sample of 6007 live births born in 2018–2019. Mothers provided detailed interviews on sociodemographic characteristics and birth weight, and their perceptions on LBW (birth weight <2500 g). We report on birth weight availability, LBW prevalence, neonatal mortality rate (NMR) by birth weight and perceptions of mothers on LBW implications. SETTING: Bihar state, India. PARTICIPANTS: Women with live birth between October 2018 and September 2019. RESULTS: A total of 5021 (83.5%) live births participated, and 3939 (78.4%) were weighed at birth. LBW prevalence among those with available birth weight was 18.4% (95% CI 17.1 to 19.7). Majority (87.5%) of the live births born at home were not weighed at birth. LBW prevalence decreased and birth weight ≥2500 g increased significantly with increasing wealth index quartile. NMR was significantly higher in live births weighing <1500 g (11.3%; 95% CI 5.1 to 23.1) and 1500–1999 g (8.0%; 95% CI 4.6 to 13.6) than those weighing ≥2500 g (1.3%, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.7). Assuming proportional correspondence of LBW and NMR in live births with and without birth weight, the estimated LBW among those without birth weight was 35.5% (95% CI 33.0 to 38.0) and among all live births irrespective of birth weight availability was 23.0% (95% CI 21.9 to 24.2). 70% of mothers considered LBW to be a sign of sickness, 59.5% perceived it as a risk of developing other illnesses and 8.6% as having an increased probability of death. CONCLUSIONS: Missing birth weight is substantially compromising the planning of interventions to address LBW at the population-level. Variations of LBW by place of delivery and sociodemographic indicators, and the perceptions of carers about LBW can facilitate appropriate actions to address LBW and the associated neonatal mortality. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9214371/ /pubmed/35728896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061934 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Kumar, G Anil George, Sibin Akbar, Md Bhattacharya, Debarshi Nanda, Priya Dandona, Lalit Dandona, Rakhi Implications of the availability and distribution of birth weight on addressing neonatal mortality: population-based assessment from Bihar state of India |
title | Implications of the availability and distribution of birth weight on addressing neonatal mortality: population-based assessment from Bihar state of India |
title_full | Implications of the availability and distribution of birth weight on addressing neonatal mortality: population-based assessment from Bihar state of India |
title_fullStr | Implications of the availability and distribution of birth weight on addressing neonatal mortality: population-based assessment from Bihar state of India |
title_full_unstemmed | Implications of the availability and distribution of birth weight on addressing neonatal mortality: population-based assessment from Bihar state of India |
title_short | Implications of the availability and distribution of birth weight on addressing neonatal mortality: population-based assessment from Bihar state of India |
title_sort | implications of the availability and distribution of birth weight on addressing neonatal mortality: population-based assessment from bihar state of india |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35728896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061934 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumarganil implicationsoftheavailabilityanddistributionofbirthweightonaddressingneonatalmortalitypopulationbasedassessmentfrombiharstateofindia AT georgesibin implicationsoftheavailabilityanddistributionofbirthweightonaddressingneonatalmortalitypopulationbasedassessmentfrombiharstateofindia AT akbarmd implicationsoftheavailabilityanddistributionofbirthweightonaddressingneonatalmortalitypopulationbasedassessmentfrombiharstateofindia AT bhattacharyadebarshi implicationsoftheavailabilityanddistributionofbirthweightonaddressingneonatalmortalitypopulationbasedassessmentfrombiharstateofindia AT nandapriya implicationsoftheavailabilityanddistributionofbirthweightonaddressingneonatalmortalitypopulationbasedassessmentfrombiharstateofindia AT dandonalalit implicationsoftheavailabilityanddistributionofbirthweightonaddressingneonatalmortalitypopulationbasedassessmentfrombiharstateofindia AT dandonarakhi implicationsoftheavailabilityanddistributionofbirthweightonaddressingneonatalmortalitypopulationbasedassessmentfrombiharstateofindia |