Cargando…

Implications of the availability and distribution of birth weight on addressing neonatal mortality: population-based assessment from Bihar state of India

OBJECTIVE: A large proportion of neonatal deaths in India are attributable to low birth weight (LBW). We report population-based distribution and determinants of birth weight in Bihar state, and on the perceptions about birth weight among carers. DESIGN: A cross-sectional household survey in a state...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, G Anil, George, Sibin, Akbar, Md, Bhattacharya, Debarshi, Nanda, Priya, Dandona, Lalit, Dandona, Rakhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35728896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061934
_version_ 1784731001066356736
author Kumar, G Anil
George, Sibin
Akbar, Md
Bhattacharya, Debarshi
Nanda, Priya
Dandona, Lalit
Dandona, Rakhi
author_facet Kumar, G Anil
George, Sibin
Akbar, Md
Bhattacharya, Debarshi
Nanda, Priya
Dandona, Lalit
Dandona, Rakhi
author_sort Kumar, G Anil
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: A large proportion of neonatal deaths in India are attributable to low birth weight (LBW). We report population-based distribution and determinants of birth weight in Bihar state, and on the perceptions about birth weight among carers. DESIGN: A cross-sectional household survey in a state representative sample of 6007 live births born in 2018–2019. Mothers provided detailed interviews on sociodemographic characteristics and birth weight, and their perceptions on LBW (birth weight <2500 g). We report on birth weight availability, LBW prevalence, neonatal mortality rate (NMR) by birth weight and perceptions of mothers on LBW implications. SETTING: Bihar state, India. PARTICIPANTS: Women with live birth between October 2018 and September 2019. RESULTS: A total of 5021 (83.5%) live births participated, and 3939 (78.4%) were weighed at birth. LBW prevalence among those with available birth weight was 18.4% (95% CI 17.1 to 19.7). Majority (87.5%) of the live births born at home were not weighed at birth. LBW prevalence decreased and birth weight ≥2500 g increased significantly with increasing wealth index quartile. NMR was significantly higher in live births weighing <1500 g (11.3%; 95% CI 5.1 to 23.1) and 1500–1999 g (8.0%; 95% CI 4.6 to 13.6) than those weighing ≥2500 g (1.3%, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.7). Assuming proportional correspondence of LBW and NMR in live births with and without birth weight, the estimated LBW among those without birth weight was 35.5% (95% CI 33.0 to 38.0) and among all live births irrespective of birth weight availability was 23.0% (95% CI 21.9 to 24.2). 70% of mothers considered LBW to be a sign of sickness, 59.5% perceived it as a risk of developing other illnesses and 8.6% as having an increased probability of death. CONCLUSIONS: Missing birth weight is substantially compromising the planning of interventions to address LBW at the population-level. Variations of LBW by place of delivery and sociodemographic indicators, and the perceptions of carers about LBW can facilitate appropriate actions to address LBW and the associated neonatal mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9214371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92143712022-07-07 Implications of the availability and distribution of birth weight on addressing neonatal mortality: population-based assessment from Bihar state of India Kumar, G Anil George, Sibin Akbar, Md Bhattacharya, Debarshi Nanda, Priya Dandona, Lalit Dandona, Rakhi BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVE: A large proportion of neonatal deaths in India are attributable to low birth weight (LBW). We report population-based distribution and determinants of birth weight in Bihar state, and on the perceptions about birth weight among carers. DESIGN: A cross-sectional household survey in a state representative sample of 6007 live births born in 2018–2019. Mothers provided detailed interviews on sociodemographic characteristics and birth weight, and their perceptions on LBW (birth weight <2500 g). We report on birth weight availability, LBW prevalence, neonatal mortality rate (NMR) by birth weight and perceptions of mothers on LBW implications. SETTING: Bihar state, India. PARTICIPANTS: Women with live birth between October 2018 and September 2019. RESULTS: A total of 5021 (83.5%) live births participated, and 3939 (78.4%) were weighed at birth. LBW prevalence among those with available birth weight was 18.4% (95% CI 17.1 to 19.7). Majority (87.5%) of the live births born at home were not weighed at birth. LBW prevalence decreased and birth weight ≥2500 g increased significantly with increasing wealth index quartile. NMR was significantly higher in live births weighing <1500 g (11.3%; 95% CI 5.1 to 23.1) and 1500–1999 g (8.0%; 95% CI 4.6 to 13.6) than those weighing ≥2500 g (1.3%, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.7). Assuming proportional correspondence of LBW and NMR in live births with and without birth weight, the estimated LBW among those without birth weight was 35.5% (95% CI 33.0 to 38.0) and among all live births irrespective of birth weight availability was 23.0% (95% CI 21.9 to 24.2). 70% of mothers considered LBW to be a sign of sickness, 59.5% perceived it as a risk of developing other illnesses and 8.6% as having an increased probability of death. CONCLUSIONS: Missing birth weight is substantially compromising the planning of interventions to address LBW at the population-level. Variations of LBW by place of delivery and sociodemographic indicators, and the perceptions of carers about LBW can facilitate appropriate actions to address LBW and the associated neonatal mortality. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9214371/ /pubmed/35728896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061934 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Kumar, G Anil
George, Sibin
Akbar, Md
Bhattacharya, Debarshi
Nanda, Priya
Dandona, Lalit
Dandona, Rakhi
Implications of the availability and distribution of birth weight on addressing neonatal mortality: population-based assessment from Bihar state of India
title Implications of the availability and distribution of birth weight on addressing neonatal mortality: population-based assessment from Bihar state of India
title_full Implications of the availability and distribution of birth weight on addressing neonatal mortality: population-based assessment from Bihar state of India
title_fullStr Implications of the availability and distribution of birth weight on addressing neonatal mortality: population-based assessment from Bihar state of India
title_full_unstemmed Implications of the availability and distribution of birth weight on addressing neonatal mortality: population-based assessment from Bihar state of India
title_short Implications of the availability and distribution of birth weight on addressing neonatal mortality: population-based assessment from Bihar state of India
title_sort implications of the availability and distribution of birth weight on addressing neonatal mortality: population-based assessment from bihar state of india
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35728896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061934
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarganil implicationsoftheavailabilityanddistributionofbirthweightonaddressingneonatalmortalitypopulationbasedassessmentfrombiharstateofindia
AT georgesibin implicationsoftheavailabilityanddistributionofbirthweightonaddressingneonatalmortalitypopulationbasedassessmentfrombiharstateofindia
AT akbarmd implicationsoftheavailabilityanddistributionofbirthweightonaddressingneonatalmortalitypopulationbasedassessmentfrombiharstateofindia
AT bhattacharyadebarshi implicationsoftheavailabilityanddistributionofbirthweightonaddressingneonatalmortalitypopulationbasedassessmentfrombiharstateofindia
AT nandapriya implicationsoftheavailabilityanddistributionofbirthweightonaddressingneonatalmortalitypopulationbasedassessmentfrombiharstateofindia
AT dandonalalit implicationsoftheavailabilityanddistributionofbirthweightonaddressingneonatalmortalitypopulationbasedassessmentfrombiharstateofindia
AT dandonarakhi implicationsoftheavailabilityanddistributionofbirthweightonaddressingneonatalmortalitypopulationbasedassessmentfrombiharstateofindia