Cargando…

Systematic development of quality indicators for skin cancer management in primary care: a mixed-methods study protocol

INTRODUCTION: Australia has the highest incidence of skin cancer in the world, with two out of three Australians expected to be diagnosed with skin cancer in their lifetime. Such incidence necessitates large-scale, effective skin cancer management practices. General practitioners (in mainstream prac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laginha, Bela Ines, Rapport, Frances, Smith, Andrea, Wilkinson, David, Cust, Anne E, Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35725249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059829
_version_ 1784731003024048128
author Laginha, Bela Ines
Rapport, Frances
Smith, Andrea
Wilkinson, David
Cust, Anne E
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
author_facet Laginha, Bela Ines
Rapport, Frances
Smith, Andrea
Wilkinson, David
Cust, Anne E
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
author_sort Laginha, Bela Ines
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Australia has the highest incidence of skin cancer in the world, with two out of three Australians expected to be diagnosed with skin cancer in their lifetime. Such incidence necessitates large-scale, effective skin cancer management practices. General practitioners (in mainstream practice and in skin cancer clinics) play an important role in skin cancer care provision, making decisions based on relevant evidence-based guidelines, protocols, experience and training. Diversity in these decision-making practices can result in unwarranted variation. Quality indicators are frequently implemented in healthcare contexts to measure performance quality at the level of the clinician and healthcare practice and mitigate unwarranted variation. Such measurements can facilitate performance comparisons between peers and a standard benchmark, often resulting in improved processes and outcomes. A standardised set of quality indicators is yet to be developed in the context of primary care skin cancer management. AIMS: This research aims to identify, develop and generate expert consensus on a core set of quality indicators for skin cancer management in primary care. METHODS: This mixed-methods study involves (1) a scoping review of the available evidence on quality indicators in skin cancer management in primary care, (2) identification and development of a core set of quality indicators through interviews/qualitative proforma surveys with participants, and (3) a focus group involving discussion of quality indicators according to Nominal Group Technique. Qualitative and quantitative data will be collected and analysed using thematic and descriptive statistical analytical methods. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval was granted by the university’s Research Ethics Committee (HREC no. 520211051532420). Results from this study will be widely disseminated in publications, study presentations, educational events and reports.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9214379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92143792022-07-07 Systematic development of quality indicators for skin cancer management in primary care: a mixed-methods study protocol Laginha, Bela Ines Rapport, Frances Smith, Andrea Wilkinson, David Cust, Anne E Braithwaite, Jeffrey BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Australia has the highest incidence of skin cancer in the world, with two out of three Australians expected to be diagnosed with skin cancer in their lifetime. Such incidence necessitates large-scale, effective skin cancer management practices. General practitioners (in mainstream practice and in skin cancer clinics) play an important role in skin cancer care provision, making decisions based on relevant evidence-based guidelines, protocols, experience and training. Diversity in these decision-making practices can result in unwarranted variation. Quality indicators are frequently implemented in healthcare contexts to measure performance quality at the level of the clinician and healthcare practice and mitigate unwarranted variation. Such measurements can facilitate performance comparisons between peers and a standard benchmark, often resulting in improved processes and outcomes. A standardised set of quality indicators is yet to be developed in the context of primary care skin cancer management. AIMS: This research aims to identify, develop and generate expert consensus on a core set of quality indicators for skin cancer management in primary care. METHODS: This mixed-methods study involves (1) a scoping review of the available evidence on quality indicators in skin cancer management in primary care, (2) identification and development of a core set of quality indicators through interviews/qualitative proforma surveys with participants, and (3) a focus group involving discussion of quality indicators according to Nominal Group Technique. Qualitative and quantitative data will be collected and analysed using thematic and descriptive statistical analytical methods. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval was granted by the university’s Research Ethics Committee (HREC no. 520211051532420). Results from this study will be widely disseminated in publications, study presentations, educational events and reports. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9214379/ /pubmed/35725249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059829 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Laginha, Bela Ines
Rapport, Frances
Smith, Andrea
Wilkinson, David
Cust, Anne E
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Systematic development of quality indicators for skin cancer management in primary care: a mixed-methods study protocol
title Systematic development of quality indicators for skin cancer management in primary care: a mixed-methods study protocol
title_full Systematic development of quality indicators for skin cancer management in primary care: a mixed-methods study protocol
title_fullStr Systematic development of quality indicators for skin cancer management in primary care: a mixed-methods study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Systematic development of quality indicators for skin cancer management in primary care: a mixed-methods study protocol
title_short Systematic development of quality indicators for skin cancer management in primary care: a mixed-methods study protocol
title_sort systematic development of quality indicators for skin cancer management in primary care: a mixed-methods study protocol
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35725249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059829
work_keys_str_mv AT laginhabelaines systematicdevelopmentofqualityindicatorsforskincancermanagementinprimarycareamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT rapportfrances systematicdevelopmentofqualityindicatorsforskincancermanagementinprimarycareamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT smithandrea systematicdevelopmentofqualityindicatorsforskincancermanagementinprimarycareamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT wilkinsondavid systematicdevelopmentofqualityindicatorsforskincancermanagementinprimarycareamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT custannee systematicdevelopmentofqualityindicatorsforskincancermanagementinprimarycareamixedmethodsstudyprotocol
AT braithwaitejeffrey systematicdevelopmentofqualityindicatorsforskincancermanagementinprimarycareamixedmethodsstudyprotocol