Cargando…
Limited waiting areas in outpatient clinics: an intervention to incorporate the effect of bridging times in blueprint schedules
BACKGROUND: Distancing measures enforced by the COVID-19 pandemic impose a restriction on the number of patients simultaneously present in hospital waiting areas. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate waiting area occupancy of an intervention that designs clinic blueprint schedules, in which all appointments of the p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35728864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001703 |
_version_ | 1784731010003369984 |
---|---|
author | Dijkstra, Sander Otten, Maarten Leeftink, Gréanne Kamphorst, Bas Olde Meierink, Angelique Heinen, Anouk Bijlsma, Rhodé Boucherie, Richard J |
author_facet | Dijkstra, Sander Otten, Maarten Leeftink, Gréanne Kamphorst, Bas Olde Meierink, Angelique Heinen, Anouk Bijlsma, Rhodé Boucherie, Richard J |
author_sort | Dijkstra, Sander |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Distancing measures enforced by the COVID-19 pandemic impose a restriction on the number of patients simultaneously present in hospital waiting areas. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate waiting area occupancy of an intervention that designs clinic blueprint schedules, in which all appointments of the pre-COVID-19 case mix are scheduled either digitally or in person under COVID-19 distancing measures, whereby the number of in-person appointments is maximised. METHODS: Preintervention analysis and prospective assessment of intervention outcomes were used to evaluate the outcomes on waiting area occupancy and number of in-person consultations (postintervention only) using descriptive statistics, for two settings in the Rheumatology Clinic of Sint Maartenskliniek (SMK) and Medical Oncology & Haematology Outpatient Clinic of University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU). Retrospective data from October 2019 to February 2020 were used to evaluate the pre-COVID-19 blueprint schedules. An iterative optimisation and simulation approach was followed, based on integer linear programming and Monte Carlo simulation, which iteratively optimised and evaluated blueprint schedules until the 95% CI of the number of patients in the waiting area did not exceed available capacity. RESULTS: Under pre-COVID-19 blueprint schedules, waiting areas would be overcrowded by up to 22 (SMK) and 11 (UMCU) patients, given the COVID-19 distancing measures. The postintervention blueprint scheduled all appointments without overcrowding the waiting areas, of which 88% and 87% were in person and 12% and 13% were digitally (SMK and UMCU, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention was effective in two case studies with different waiting area characteristics and a varying number of interdependent patient trajectory stages. The intervention is generically applicable to a wide range of healthcare services that schedule a (series of) appointment(s) for their patients. Care providers can use the intervention to evaluate overcrowding of waiting area(s) and design optimal blueprint schedules to continue a maximum number of in-person appointments under pandemic distancing measures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9214409 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92144092022-07-07 Limited waiting areas in outpatient clinics: an intervention to incorporate the effect of bridging times in blueprint schedules Dijkstra, Sander Otten, Maarten Leeftink, Gréanne Kamphorst, Bas Olde Meierink, Angelique Heinen, Anouk Bijlsma, Rhodé Boucherie, Richard J BMJ Open Qual Original Research BACKGROUND: Distancing measures enforced by the COVID-19 pandemic impose a restriction on the number of patients simultaneously present in hospital waiting areas. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate waiting area occupancy of an intervention that designs clinic blueprint schedules, in which all appointments of the pre-COVID-19 case mix are scheduled either digitally or in person under COVID-19 distancing measures, whereby the number of in-person appointments is maximised. METHODS: Preintervention analysis and prospective assessment of intervention outcomes were used to evaluate the outcomes on waiting area occupancy and number of in-person consultations (postintervention only) using descriptive statistics, for two settings in the Rheumatology Clinic of Sint Maartenskliniek (SMK) and Medical Oncology & Haematology Outpatient Clinic of University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU). Retrospective data from October 2019 to February 2020 were used to evaluate the pre-COVID-19 blueprint schedules. An iterative optimisation and simulation approach was followed, based on integer linear programming and Monte Carlo simulation, which iteratively optimised and evaluated blueprint schedules until the 95% CI of the number of patients in the waiting area did not exceed available capacity. RESULTS: Under pre-COVID-19 blueprint schedules, waiting areas would be overcrowded by up to 22 (SMK) and 11 (UMCU) patients, given the COVID-19 distancing measures. The postintervention blueprint scheduled all appointments without overcrowding the waiting areas, of which 88% and 87% were in person and 12% and 13% were digitally (SMK and UMCU, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention was effective in two case studies with different waiting area characteristics and a varying number of interdependent patient trajectory stages. The intervention is generically applicable to a wide range of healthcare services that schedule a (series of) appointment(s) for their patients. Care providers can use the intervention to evaluate overcrowding of waiting area(s) and design optimal blueprint schedules to continue a maximum number of in-person appointments under pandemic distancing measures. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9214409/ /pubmed/35728864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001703 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Dijkstra, Sander Otten, Maarten Leeftink, Gréanne Kamphorst, Bas Olde Meierink, Angelique Heinen, Anouk Bijlsma, Rhodé Boucherie, Richard J Limited waiting areas in outpatient clinics: an intervention to incorporate the effect of bridging times in blueprint schedules |
title | Limited waiting areas in outpatient clinics: an intervention to incorporate the effect of bridging times in blueprint schedules |
title_full | Limited waiting areas in outpatient clinics: an intervention to incorporate the effect of bridging times in blueprint schedules |
title_fullStr | Limited waiting areas in outpatient clinics: an intervention to incorporate the effect of bridging times in blueprint schedules |
title_full_unstemmed | Limited waiting areas in outpatient clinics: an intervention to incorporate the effect of bridging times in blueprint schedules |
title_short | Limited waiting areas in outpatient clinics: an intervention to incorporate the effect of bridging times in blueprint schedules |
title_sort | limited waiting areas in outpatient clinics: an intervention to incorporate the effect of bridging times in blueprint schedules |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35728864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001703 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dijkstrasander limitedwaitingareasinoutpatientclinicsaninterventiontoincorporatetheeffectofbridgingtimesinblueprintschedules AT ottenmaarten limitedwaitingareasinoutpatientclinicsaninterventiontoincorporatetheeffectofbridgingtimesinblueprintschedules AT leeftinkgreanne limitedwaitingareasinoutpatientclinicsaninterventiontoincorporatetheeffectofbridgingtimesinblueprintschedules AT kamphorstbas limitedwaitingareasinoutpatientclinicsaninterventiontoincorporatetheeffectofbridgingtimesinblueprintschedules AT oldemeierinkangelique limitedwaitingareasinoutpatientclinicsaninterventiontoincorporatetheeffectofbridgingtimesinblueprintschedules AT heinenanouk limitedwaitingareasinoutpatientclinicsaninterventiontoincorporatetheeffectofbridgingtimesinblueprintschedules AT bijlsmarhode limitedwaitingareasinoutpatientclinicsaninterventiontoincorporatetheeffectofbridgingtimesinblueprintschedules AT boucherierichardj limitedwaitingareasinoutpatientclinicsaninterventiontoincorporatetheeffectofbridgingtimesinblueprintschedules |