Cargando…

Limited waiting areas in outpatient clinics: an intervention to incorporate the effect of bridging times in blueprint schedules

BACKGROUND: Distancing measures enforced by the COVID-19 pandemic impose a restriction on the number of patients simultaneously present in hospital waiting areas. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate waiting area occupancy of an intervention that designs clinic blueprint schedules, in which all appointments of the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dijkstra, Sander, Otten, Maarten, Leeftink, Gréanne, Kamphorst, Bas, Olde Meierink, Angelique, Heinen, Anouk, Bijlsma, Rhodé, Boucherie, Richard J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35728864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001703
_version_ 1784731010003369984
author Dijkstra, Sander
Otten, Maarten
Leeftink, Gréanne
Kamphorst, Bas
Olde Meierink, Angelique
Heinen, Anouk
Bijlsma, Rhodé
Boucherie, Richard J
author_facet Dijkstra, Sander
Otten, Maarten
Leeftink, Gréanne
Kamphorst, Bas
Olde Meierink, Angelique
Heinen, Anouk
Bijlsma, Rhodé
Boucherie, Richard J
author_sort Dijkstra, Sander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Distancing measures enforced by the COVID-19 pandemic impose a restriction on the number of patients simultaneously present in hospital waiting areas. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate waiting area occupancy of an intervention that designs clinic blueprint schedules, in which all appointments of the pre-COVID-19 case mix are scheduled either digitally or in person under COVID-19 distancing measures, whereby the number of in-person appointments is maximised. METHODS: Preintervention analysis and prospective assessment of intervention outcomes were used to evaluate the outcomes on waiting area occupancy and number of in-person consultations (postintervention only) using descriptive statistics, for two settings in the Rheumatology Clinic of Sint Maartenskliniek (SMK) and Medical Oncology & Haematology Outpatient Clinic of University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU). Retrospective data from October 2019 to February 2020 were used to evaluate the pre-COVID-19 blueprint schedules. An iterative optimisation and simulation approach was followed, based on integer linear programming and Monte Carlo simulation, which iteratively optimised and evaluated blueprint schedules until the 95% CI of the number of patients in the waiting area did not exceed available capacity. RESULTS: Under pre-COVID-19 blueprint schedules, waiting areas would be overcrowded by up to 22 (SMK) and 11 (UMCU) patients, given the COVID-19 distancing measures. The postintervention blueprint scheduled all appointments without overcrowding the waiting areas, of which 88% and 87% were in person and 12% and 13% were digitally (SMK and UMCU, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention was effective in two case studies with different waiting area characteristics and a varying number of interdependent patient trajectory stages. The intervention is generically applicable to a wide range of healthcare services that schedule a (series of) appointment(s) for their patients. Care providers can use the intervention to evaluate overcrowding of waiting area(s) and design optimal blueprint schedules to continue a maximum number of in-person appointments under pandemic distancing measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9214409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92144092022-07-07 Limited waiting areas in outpatient clinics: an intervention to incorporate the effect of bridging times in blueprint schedules Dijkstra, Sander Otten, Maarten Leeftink, Gréanne Kamphorst, Bas Olde Meierink, Angelique Heinen, Anouk Bijlsma, Rhodé Boucherie, Richard J BMJ Open Qual Original Research BACKGROUND: Distancing measures enforced by the COVID-19 pandemic impose a restriction on the number of patients simultaneously present in hospital waiting areas. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate waiting area occupancy of an intervention that designs clinic blueprint schedules, in which all appointments of the pre-COVID-19 case mix are scheduled either digitally or in person under COVID-19 distancing measures, whereby the number of in-person appointments is maximised. METHODS: Preintervention analysis and prospective assessment of intervention outcomes were used to evaluate the outcomes on waiting area occupancy and number of in-person consultations (postintervention only) using descriptive statistics, for two settings in the Rheumatology Clinic of Sint Maartenskliniek (SMK) and Medical Oncology & Haematology Outpatient Clinic of University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU). Retrospective data from October 2019 to February 2020 were used to evaluate the pre-COVID-19 blueprint schedules. An iterative optimisation and simulation approach was followed, based on integer linear programming and Monte Carlo simulation, which iteratively optimised and evaluated blueprint schedules until the 95% CI of the number of patients in the waiting area did not exceed available capacity. RESULTS: Under pre-COVID-19 blueprint schedules, waiting areas would be overcrowded by up to 22 (SMK) and 11 (UMCU) patients, given the COVID-19 distancing measures. The postintervention blueprint scheduled all appointments without overcrowding the waiting areas, of which 88% and 87% were in person and 12% and 13% were digitally (SMK and UMCU, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention was effective in two case studies with different waiting area characteristics and a varying number of interdependent patient trajectory stages. The intervention is generically applicable to a wide range of healthcare services that schedule a (series of) appointment(s) for their patients. Care providers can use the intervention to evaluate overcrowding of waiting area(s) and design optimal blueprint schedules to continue a maximum number of in-person appointments under pandemic distancing measures. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9214409/ /pubmed/35728864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001703 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Dijkstra, Sander
Otten, Maarten
Leeftink, Gréanne
Kamphorst, Bas
Olde Meierink, Angelique
Heinen, Anouk
Bijlsma, Rhodé
Boucherie, Richard J
Limited waiting areas in outpatient clinics: an intervention to incorporate the effect of bridging times in blueprint schedules
title Limited waiting areas in outpatient clinics: an intervention to incorporate the effect of bridging times in blueprint schedules
title_full Limited waiting areas in outpatient clinics: an intervention to incorporate the effect of bridging times in blueprint schedules
title_fullStr Limited waiting areas in outpatient clinics: an intervention to incorporate the effect of bridging times in blueprint schedules
title_full_unstemmed Limited waiting areas in outpatient clinics: an intervention to incorporate the effect of bridging times in blueprint schedules
title_short Limited waiting areas in outpatient clinics: an intervention to incorporate the effect of bridging times in blueprint schedules
title_sort limited waiting areas in outpatient clinics: an intervention to incorporate the effect of bridging times in blueprint schedules
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35728864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001703
work_keys_str_mv AT dijkstrasander limitedwaitingareasinoutpatientclinicsaninterventiontoincorporatetheeffectofbridgingtimesinblueprintschedules
AT ottenmaarten limitedwaitingareasinoutpatientclinicsaninterventiontoincorporatetheeffectofbridgingtimesinblueprintschedules
AT leeftinkgreanne limitedwaitingareasinoutpatientclinicsaninterventiontoincorporatetheeffectofbridgingtimesinblueprintschedules
AT kamphorstbas limitedwaitingareasinoutpatientclinicsaninterventiontoincorporatetheeffectofbridgingtimesinblueprintschedules
AT oldemeierinkangelique limitedwaitingareasinoutpatientclinicsaninterventiontoincorporatetheeffectofbridgingtimesinblueprintschedules
AT heinenanouk limitedwaitingareasinoutpatientclinicsaninterventiontoincorporatetheeffectofbridgingtimesinblueprintschedules
AT bijlsmarhode limitedwaitingareasinoutpatientclinicsaninterventiontoincorporatetheeffectofbridgingtimesinblueprintschedules
AT boucherierichardj limitedwaitingareasinoutpatientclinicsaninterventiontoincorporatetheeffectofbridgingtimesinblueprintschedules