Cargando…

Optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques

OBJECTIVE: To assess the enamel surface damage and residual adhesive remnant [adhesive remnant index (ARI)] on extracted premolars after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different debonding techniques, with optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: Ninety extracted premolars were bonded...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khader, Maimoona Abdul, Dileep, Soorya, Gafoor A., Abdul, MJ, Jijin, Sunil, Manisha, Krishnaraj, Parthiban
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35754420
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_192_21
_version_ 1784731014135808000
author Khader, Maimoona Abdul
Dileep, Soorya
Gafoor A., Abdul
MJ, Jijin
Sunil, Manisha
Krishnaraj, Parthiban
author_facet Khader, Maimoona Abdul
Dileep, Soorya
Gafoor A., Abdul
MJ, Jijin
Sunil, Manisha
Krishnaraj, Parthiban
author_sort Khader, Maimoona Abdul
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the enamel surface damage and residual adhesive remnant [adhesive remnant index (ARI)] on extracted premolars after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different debonding techniques, with optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: Ninety extracted premolars were bonded with ceramic brackets and divided into three groups of 30 teeth each based on debonding techniques used. Twenty-four hours later, they were debonded using three different debonding techniques: debonding pliers, ultrasonic scalers, and Er-YAG laser. A baseline scan was obtained prior to bonding using OCT. The teeth were evaluated for the adhesive remnant on the tooth surface using ARI score, and the amount of enamel surface damage was evaluated using OCT. RESULTS: We observed that the use of ultrasonic scalers as a debonding technique led to greater incidence of enamel surface damage as measured in OCT. The ARI scores with debonding pliers and laser were significantly greater than that of scaler debonding. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this in vitro study confirmed that use of ultrasonic scalers as a debonding technique led to significantly greater incidence of enamel surface damage when compared to the other two debonding techniques. The ARI scores on the tooth surface using debonding pliers and laser were significantly greater than that of the scaler debonding technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9214424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92144242022-06-23 Optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques Khader, Maimoona Abdul Dileep, Soorya Gafoor A., Abdul MJ, Jijin Sunil, Manisha Krishnaraj, Parthiban J Orthod Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the enamel surface damage and residual adhesive remnant [adhesive remnant index (ARI)] on extracted premolars after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different debonding techniques, with optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: Ninety extracted premolars were bonded with ceramic brackets and divided into three groups of 30 teeth each based on debonding techniques used. Twenty-four hours later, they were debonded using three different debonding techniques: debonding pliers, ultrasonic scalers, and Er-YAG laser. A baseline scan was obtained prior to bonding using OCT. The teeth were evaluated for the adhesive remnant on the tooth surface using ARI score, and the amount of enamel surface damage was evaluated using OCT. RESULTS: We observed that the use of ultrasonic scalers as a debonding technique led to greater incidence of enamel surface damage as measured in OCT. The ARI scores with debonding pliers and laser were significantly greater than that of scaler debonding. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this in vitro study confirmed that use of ultrasonic scalers as a debonding technique led to significantly greater incidence of enamel surface damage when compared to the other two debonding techniques. The ARI scores on the tooth surface using debonding pliers and laser were significantly greater than that of the scaler debonding technique. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9214424/ /pubmed/35754420 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_192_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Orthodontic Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Khader, Maimoona Abdul
Dileep, Soorya
Gafoor A., Abdul
MJ, Jijin
Sunil, Manisha
Krishnaraj, Parthiban
Optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques
title Optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques
title_full Optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques
title_fullStr Optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques
title_full_unstemmed Optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques
title_short Optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques
title_sort optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35754420
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_192_21
work_keys_str_mv AT khadermaimoonaabdul opticalcoherencetomographyassessmentoftheenamelsurfaceafterdebondingtheceramicbracketsusingthreedifferenttechniques
AT dileepsoorya opticalcoherencetomographyassessmentoftheenamelsurfaceafterdebondingtheceramicbracketsusingthreedifferenttechniques
AT gafooraabdul opticalcoherencetomographyassessmentoftheenamelsurfaceafterdebondingtheceramicbracketsusingthreedifferenttechniques
AT mjjijin opticalcoherencetomographyassessmentoftheenamelsurfaceafterdebondingtheceramicbracketsusingthreedifferenttechniques
AT sunilmanisha opticalcoherencetomographyassessmentoftheenamelsurfaceafterdebondingtheceramicbracketsusingthreedifferenttechniques
AT krishnarajparthiban opticalcoherencetomographyassessmentoftheenamelsurfaceafterdebondingtheceramicbracketsusingthreedifferenttechniques