Cargando…
Optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques
OBJECTIVE: To assess the enamel surface damage and residual adhesive remnant [adhesive remnant index (ARI)] on extracted premolars after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different debonding techniques, with optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: Ninety extracted premolars were bonded...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35754420 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_192_21 |
_version_ | 1784731014135808000 |
---|---|
author | Khader, Maimoona Abdul Dileep, Soorya Gafoor A., Abdul MJ, Jijin Sunil, Manisha Krishnaraj, Parthiban |
author_facet | Khader, Maimoona Abdul Dileep, Soorya Gafoor A., Abdul MJ, Jijin Sunil, Manisha Krishnaraj, Parthiban |
author_sort | Khader, Maimoona Abdul |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the enamel surface damage and residual adhesive remnant [adhesive remnant index (ARI)] on extracted premolars after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different debonding techniques, with optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: Ninety extracted premolars were bonded with ceramic brackets and divided into three groups of 30 teeth each based on debonding techniques used. Twenty-four hours later, they were debonded using three different debonding techniques: debonding pliers, ultrasonic scalers, and Er-YAG laser. A baseline scan was obtained prior to bonding using OCT. The teeth were evaluated for the adhesive remnant on the tooth surface using ARI score, and the amount of enamel surface damage was evaluated using OCT. RESULTS: We observed that the use of ultrasonic scalers as a debonding technique led to greater incidence of enamel surface damage as measured in OCT. The ARI scores with debonding pliers and laser were significantly greater than that of scaler debonding. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this in vitro study confirmed that use of ultrasonic scalers as a debonding technique led to significantly greater incidence of enamel surface damage when compared to the other two debonding techniques. The ARI scores on the tooth surface using debonding pliers and laser were significantly greater than that of the scaler debonding technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9214424 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92144242022-06-23 Optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques Khader, Maimoona Abdul Dileep, Soorya Gafoor A., Abdul MJ, Jijin Sunil, Manisha Krishnaraj, Parthiban J Orthod Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the enamel surface damage and residual adhesive remnant [adhesive remnant index (ARI)] on extracted premolars after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different debonding techniques, with optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: Ninety extracted premolars were bonded with ceramic brackets and divided into three groups of 30 teeth each based on debonding techniques used. Twenty-four hours later, they were debonded using three different debonding techniques: debonding pliers, ultrasonic scalers, and Er-YAG laser. A baseline scan was obtained prior to bonding using OCT. The teeth were evaluated for the adhesive remnant on the tooth surface using ARI score, and the amount of enamel surface damage was evaluated using OCT. RESULTS: We observed that the use of ultrasonic scalers as a debonding technique led to greater incidence of enamel surface damage as measured in OCT. The ARI scores with debonding pliers and laser were significantly greater than that of scaler debonding. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this in vitro study confirmed that use of ultrasonic scalers as a debonding technique led to significantly greater incidence of enamel surface damage when compared to the other two debonding techniques. The ARI scores on the tooth surface using debonding pliers and laser were significantly greater than that of the scaler debonding technique. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9214424/ /pubmed/35754420 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_192_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Orthodontic Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Khader, Maimoona Abdul Dileep, Soorya Gafoor A., Abdul MJ, Jijin Sunil, Manisha Krishnaraj, Parthiban Optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques |
title | Optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques |
title_full | Optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques |
title_fullStr | Optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques |
title_short | Optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques |
title_sort | optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35754420 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_192_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khadermaimoonaabdul opticalcoherencetomographyassessmentoftheenamelsurfaceafterdebondingtheceramicbracketsusingthreedifferenttechniques AT dileepsoorya opticalcoherencetomographyassessmentoftheenamelsurfaceafterdebondingtheceramicbracketsusingthreedifferenttechniques AT gafooraabdul opticalcoherencetomographyassessmentoftheenamelsurfaceafterdebondingtheceramicbracketsusingthreedifferenttechniques AT mjjijin opticalcoherencetomographyassessmentoftheenamelsurfaceafterdebondingtheceramicbracketsusingthreedifferenttechniques AT sunilmanisha opticalcoherencetomographyassessmentoftheenamelsurfaceafterdebondingtheceramicbracketsusingthreedifferenttechniques AT krishnarajparthiban opticalcoherencetomographyassessmentoftheenamelsurfaceafterdebondingtheceramicbracketsusingthreedifferenttechniques |