Cargando…
Effect of customized vibratory device on orthodontic tooth movement: A prospective randomized control trial
AIMS: The primary purpose of the present trial was to evaluate the effect of low-frequency (30Hz) vibrations on the rate of canine retraction. SETTING AND DESIGN: Single-center, split mouth prospective randomized controlled clinical trial METHODS AND MATERIAL: 100 screened subjects (aged18–25 years)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35754416 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_127_21 |
_version_ | 1784731017710403584 |
---|---|
author | Khera, Amit K. Raghav, Pradeep Mehra, Varun Wadhawan, Ashutosh Gupta, Navna Phull, Tarun S. |
author_facet | Khera, Amit K. Raghav, Pradeep Mehra, Varun Wadhawan, Ashutosh Gupta, Navna Phull, Tarun S. |
author_sort | Khera, Amit K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: The primary purpose of the present trial was to evaluate the effect of low-frequency (30Hz) vibrations on the rate of canine retraction. SETTING AND DESIGN: Single-center, split mouth prospective randomized controlled clinical trial METHODS AND MATERIAL: 100 screened subjects (aged18–25 years) were selected; out of which 30 subjects having Class I bimaxillary protrusion or Class II div 1 malocclusion, requiring upper 1(st) premolar therapeutic extractions, were selected for the study. A split-mouth study design was prepared for the maxillary arch of each selected individual and was randomly allocated into vibration and nonvibration side (control) groups. A customized vibratory device was fabricated for each subject to deliver low-frequency vibrations (30 Hz). Scanned 3D models were prepared sequentially to assess the amount of tooth movement from baseline (T0),(T1), (T2), (T3), and (T4)-4(th) month of canine retraction. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Independent “t” test. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant differencein the rate of individual canine retraction among the experimental and control groups when the intergroup comparison was done using independent “t” test at T1-T0, (P = 0.954), T2-T1 (P = 0.244), T3-T2 (P = 0.357), and T4-T3 (P = 0.189). CONCLUSION: The low-frequency vibratory stimulation of 30 Hz using a customized vibratory device did not significantly accelerate the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ctri.nic.in (CTRI/2019/05/019043). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9214440 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92144402022-06-23 Effect of customized vibratory device on orthodontic tooth movement: A prospective randomized control trial Khera, Amit K. Raghav, Pradeep Mehra, Varun Wadhawan, Ashutosh Gupta, Navna Phull, Tarun S. J Orthod Sci Original Article AIMS: The primary purpose of the present trial was to evaluate the effect of low-frequency (30Hz) vibrations on the rate of canine retraction. SETTING AND DESIGN: Single-center, split mouth prospective randomized controlled clinical trial METHODS AND MATERIAL: 100 screened subjects (aged18–25 years) were selected; out of which 30 subjects having Class I bimaxillary protrusion or Class II div 1 malocclusion, requiring upper 1(st) premolar therapeutic extractions, were selected for the study. A split-mouth study design was prepared for the maxillary arch of each selected individual and was randomly allocated into vibration and nonvibration side (control) groups. A customized vibratory device was fabricated for each subject to deliver low-frequency vibrations (30 Hz). Scanned 3D models were prepared sequentially to assess the amount of tooth movement from baseline (T0),(T1), (T2), (T3), and (T4)-4(th) month of canine retraction. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Independent “t” test. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant differencein the rate of individual canine retraction among the experimental and control groups when the intergroup comparison was done using independent “t” test at T1-T0, (P = 0.954), T2-T1 (P = 0.244), T3-T2 (P = 0.357), and T4-T3 (P = 0.189). CONCLUSION: The low-frequency vibratory stimulation of 30 Hz using a customized vibratory device did not significantly accelerate the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ctri.nic.in (CTRI/2019/05/019043). Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9214440/ /pubmed/35754416 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_127_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Orthodontic Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Khera, Amit K. Raghav, Pradeep Mehra, Varun Wadhawan, Ashutosh Gupta, Navna Phull, Tarun S. Effect of customized vibratory device on orthodontic tooth movement: A prospective randomized control trial |
title | Effect of customized vibratory device on orthodontic tooth movement: A prospective randomized control trial |
title_full | Effect of customized vibratory device on orthodontic tooth movement: A prospective randomized control trial |
title_fullStr | Effect of customized vibratory device on orthodontic tooth movement: A prospective randomized control trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of customized vibratory device on orthodontic tooth movement: A prospective randomized control trial |
title_short | Effect of customized vibratory device on orthodontic tooth movement: A prospective randomized control trial |
title_sort | effect of customized vibratory device on orthodontic tooth movement: a prospective randomized control trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35754416 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_127_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kheraamitk effectofcustomizedvibratorydeviceonorthodontictoothmovementaprospectiverandomizedcontroltrial AT raghavpradeep effectofcustomizedvibratorydeviceonorthodontictoothmovementaprospectiverandomizedcontroltrial AT mehravarun effectofcustomizedvibratorydeviceonorthodontictoothmovementaprospectiverandomizedcontroltrial AT wadhawanashutosh effectofcustomizedvibratorydeviceonorthodontictoothmovementaprospectiverandomizedcontroltrial AT guptanavna effectofcustomizedvibratorydeviceonorthodontictoothmovementaprospectiverandomizedcontroltrial AT phulltaruns effectofcustomizedvibratorydeviceonorthodontictoothmovementaprospectiverandomizedcontroltrial |