Cargando…

Effect of customized vibratory device on orthodontic tooth movement: A prospective randomized control trial

AIMS: The primary purpose of the present trial was to evaluate the effect of low-frequency (30Hz) vibrations on the rate of canine retraction. SETTING AND DESIGN: Single-center, split mouth prospective randomized controlled clinical trial METHODS AND MATERIAL: 100 screened subjects (aged18–25 years)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khera, Amit K., Raghav, Pradeep, Mehra, Varun, Wadhawan, Ashutosh, Gupta, Navna, Phull, Tarun S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35754416
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_127_21
_version_ 1784731017710403584
author Khera, Amit K.
Raghav, Pradeep
Mehra, Varun
Wadhawan, Ashutosh
Gupta, Navna
Phull, Tarun S.
author_facet Khera, Amit K.
Raghav, Pradeep
Mehra, Varun
Wadhawan, Ashutosh
Gupta, Navna
Phull, Tarun S.
author_sort Khera, Amit K.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The primary purpose of the present trial was to evaluate the effect of low-frequency (30Hz) vibrations on the rate of canine retraction. SETTING AND DESIGN: Single-center, split mouth prospective randomized controlled clinical trial METHODS AND MATERIAL: 100 screened subjects (aged18–25 years) were selected; out of which 30 subjects having Class I bimaxillary protrusion or Class II div 1 malocclusion, requiring upper 1(st) premolar therapeutic extractions, were selected for the study. A split-mouth study design was prepared for the maxillary arch of each selected individual and was randomly allocated into vibration and nonvibration side (control) groups. A customized vibratory device was fabricated for each subject to deliver low-frequency vibrations (30 Hz). Scanned 3D models were prepared sequentially to assess the amount of tooth movement from baseline (T0),(T1), (T2), (T3), and (T4)-4(th) month of canine retraction. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Independent “t” test. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant differencein the rate of individual canine retraction among the experimental and control groups when the intergroup comparison was done using independent “t” test at T1-T0, (P = 0.954), T2-T1 (P = 0.244), T3-T2 (P = 0.357), and T4-T3 (P = 0.189). CONCLUSION: The low-frequency vibratory stimulation of 30 Hz using a customized vibratory device did not significantly accelerate the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ctri.nic.in (CTRI/2019/05/019043).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9214440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92144402022-06-23 Effect of customized vibratory device on orthodontic tooth movement: A prospective randomized control trial Khera, Amit K. Raghav, Pradeep Mehra, Varun Wadhawan, Ashutosh Gupta, Navna Phull, Tarun S. J Orthod Sci Original Article AIMS: The primary purpose of the present trial was to evaluate the effect of low-frequency (30Hz) vibrations on the rate of canine retraction. SETTING AND DESIGN: Single-center, split mouth prospective randomized controlled clinical trial METHODS AND MATERIAL: 100 screened subjects (aged18–25 years) were selected; out of which 30 subjects having Class I bimaxillary protrusion or Class II div 1 malocclusion, requiring upper 1(st) premolar therapeutic extractions, were selected for the study. A split-mouth study design was prepared for the maxillary arch of each selected individual and was randomly allocated into vibration and nonvibration side (control) groups. A customized vibratory device was fabricated for each subject to deliver low-frequency vibrations (30 Hz). Scanned 3D models were prepared sequentially to assess the amount of tooth movement from baseline (T0),(T1), (T2), (T3), and (T4)-4(th) month of canine retraction. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Independent “t” test. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant differencein the rate of individual canine retraction among the experimental and control groups when the intergroup comparison was done using independent “t” test at T1-T0, (P = 0.954), T2-T1 (P = 0.244), T3-T2 (P = 0.357), and T4-T3 (P = 0.189). CONCLUSION: The low-frequency vibratory stimulation of 30 Hz using a customized vibratory device did not significantly accelerate the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ctri.nic.in (CTRI/2019/05/019043). Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9214440/ /pubmed/35754416 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_127_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Orthodontic Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Khera, Amit K.
Raghav, Pradeep
Mehra, Varun
Wadhawan, Ashutosh
Gupta, Navna
Phull, Tarun S.
Effect of customized vibratory device on orthodontic tooth movement: A prospective randomized control trial
title Effect of customized vibratory device on orthodontic tooth movement: A prospective randomized control trial
title_full Effect of customized vibratory device on orthodontic tooth movement: A prospective randomized control trial
title_fullStr Effect of customized vibratory device on orthodontic tooth movement: A prospective randomized control trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of customized vibratory device on orthodontic tooth movement: A prospective randomized control trial
title_short Effect of customized vibratory device on orthodontic tooth movement: A prospective randomized control trial
title_sort effect of customized vibratory device on orthodontic tooth movement: a prospective randomized control trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35754416
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_127_21
work_keys_str_mv AT kheraamitk effectofcustomizedvibratorydeviceonorthodontictoothmovementaprospectiverandomizedcontroltrial
AT raghavpradeep effectofcustomizedvibratorydeviceonorthodontictoothmovementaprospectiverandomizedcontroltrial
AT mehravarun effectofcustomizedvibratorydeviceonorthodontictoothmovementaprospectiverandomizedcontroltrial
AT wadhawanashutosh effectofcustomizedvibratorydeviceonorthodontictoothmovementaprospectiverandomizedcontroltrial
AT guptanavna effectofcustomizedvibratorydeviceonorthodontictoothmovementaprospectiverandomizedcontroltrial
AT phulltaruns effectofcustomizedvibratorydeviceonorthodontictoothmovementaprospectiverandomizedcontroltrial