Cargando…
The influence of time on the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 serological testing
Sensitive serological testing is essential to estimate the proportion of the population exposed or infected with SARS-CoV-2, to guide booster vaccination and to select patients for treatment with anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The performance of serological tests is usually evaluated at 14–21 days post...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35732870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14351-2 |
_version_ | 1784731024198991872 |
---|---|
author | Torres Ortiz, Arturo Fenn Torrente, Fernanda Twigg, Adam Hatcher, James Saso, Anja Lam, Tanya Johnson, Marina Wagstaffe, Helen Dhillon, Rishi Mai, Anabelle Lea Goldblatt, David Still, Rachel Buckland, Matthew Gilmour, Kimberly Grandjean, Louis |
author_facet | Torres Ortiz, Arturo Fenn Torrente, Fernanda Twigg, Adam Hatcher, James Saso, Anja Lam, Tanya Johnson, Marina Wagstaffe, Helen Dhillon, Rishi Mai, Anabelle Lea Goldblatt, David Still, Rachel Buckland, Matthew Gilmour, Kimberly Grandjean, Louis |
author_sort | Torres Ortiz, Arturo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sensitive serological testing is essential to estimate the proportion of the population exposed or infected with SARS-CoV-2, to guide booster vaccination and to select patients for treatment with anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The performance of serological tests is usually evaluated at 14–21 days post infection. This approach fails to take account of the important effect of time on test performance after infection or exposure has occurred. We performed parallel serological testing using 4 widely used assays (a multiplexed SARS-CoV-2 Nucleoprotein (N), Spike (S) and Receptor Binding Domain assay from Meso Scale Discovery (MSD), the Roche Elecsys-Nucleoprotein (Roche-N) and Spike (Roche-S) assays and the Abbott Nucleoprotein assay (Abbott-N) on serial positive monthly samples collected as part of the Co-STARs study (www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04380896) up to 200 days following infection. Our findings demonstrate the considerable effect of time since symptom onset on the diagnostic sensitivity of different assays. Using a time-to-event analysis, we demonstrated that 50% of the Abbott nucleoprotein assays will give a negative result after 175 days (median survival time 95% CI 168–185 days), compared to the better performance over time of the Roche Elecsys nucleoprotein assay (93% survival probability at 200 days, 95% CI 88–97%). Assays targeting the spike protein showed a lower decline over the follow-up period, both for the MSD spike assay (97% survival probability at 200 days, 95% CI 95–99%) and the Roche Elecsys spike assay (95% survival probability at 200 days, 95% CI 93–97%). The best performing quantitative Roche Elecsys Spike assay showed no evidence of waning Spike antibody titers over the 200-day time course of the study. We have shown that compared to other assays evaluated, the Abbott-N assay fails to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies as time passes since infection. In contrast the Roche Elecsys Spike Assay and the MSD assay maintained a high sensitivity for the 200-day duration of the study. These limitations of the Abbott assay should be considered when quantifying the immune correlates of protection or the need for SARS-CoV-2 antibody therapy. The high levels of maintained detectable neutralizing spike antibody titers identified by the quantitative Roche Elecsys assay is encouraging and provides further evidence in support of long-lasting SARS-CoV-2 protection following natural infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9214469 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92144692022-06-22 The influence of time on the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 serological testing Torres Ortiz, Arturo Fenn Torrente, Fernanda Twigg, Adam Hatcher, James Saso, Anja Lam, Tanya Johnson, Marina Wagstaffe, Helen Dhillon, Rishi Mai, Anabelle Lea Goldblatt, David Still, Rachel Buckland, Matthew Gilmour, Kimberly Grandjean, Louis Sci Rep Article Sensitive serological testing is essential to estimate the proportion of the population exposed or infected with SARS-CoV-2, to guide booster vaccination and to select patients for treatment with anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The performance of serological tests is usually evaluated at 14–21 days post infection. This approach fails to take account of the important effect of time on test performance after infection or exposure has occurred. We performed parallel serological testing using 4 widely used assays (a multiplexed SARS-CoV-2 Nucleoprotein (N), Spike (S) and Receptor Binding Domain assay from Meso Scale Discovery (MSD), the Roche Elecsys-Nucleoprotein (Roche-N) and Spike (Roche-S) assays and the Abbott Nucleoprotein assay (Abbott-N) on serial positive monthly samples collected as part of the Co-STARs study (www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04380896) up to 200 days following infection. Our findings demonstrate the considerable effect of time since symptom onset on the diagnostic sensitivity of different assays. Using a time-to-event analysis, we demonstrated that 50% of the Abbott nucleoprotein assays will give a negative result after 175 days (median survival time 95% CI 168–185 days), compared to the better performance over time of the Roche Elecsys nucleoprotein assay (93% survival probability at 200 days, 95% CI 88–97%). Assays targeting the spike protein showed a lower decline over the follow-up period, both for the MSD spike assay (97% survival probability at 200 days, 95% CI 95–99%) and the Roche Elecsys spike assay (95% survival probability at 200 days, 95% CI 93–97%). The best performing quantitative Roche Elecsys Spike assay showed no evidence of waning Spike antibody titers over the 200-day time course of the study. We have shown that compared to other assays evaluated, the Abbott-N assay fails to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies as time passes since infection. In contrast the Roche Elecsys Spike Assay and the MSD assay maintained a high sensitivity for the 200-day duration of the study. These limitations of the Abbott assay should be considered when quantifying the immune correlates of protection or the need for SARS-CoV-2 antibody therapy. The high levels of maintained detectable neutralizing spike antibody titers identified by the quantitative Roche Elecsys assay is encouraging and provides further evidence in support of long-lasting SARS-CoV-2 protection following natural infection. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9214469/ /pubmed/35732870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14351-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Torres Ortiz, Arturo Fenn Torrente, Fernanda Twigg, Adam Hatcher, James Saso, Anja Lam, Tanya Johnson, Marina Wagstaffe, Helen Dhillon, Rishi Mai, Anabelle Lea Goldblatt, David Still, Rachel Buckland, Matthew Gilmour, Kimberly Grandjean, Louis The influence of time on the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 serological testing |
title | The influence of time on the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 serological testing |
title_full | The influence of time on the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 serological testing |
title_fullStr | The influence of time on the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 serological testing |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of time on the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 serological testing |
title_short | The influence of time on the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 serological testing |
title_sort | influence of time on the sensitivity of sars-cov-2 serological testing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35732870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14351-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT torresortizarturo theinfluenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT fenntorrentefernanda theinfluenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT twiggadam theinfluenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT hatcherjames theinfluenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT sasoanja theinfluenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT lamtanya theinfluenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT johnsonmarina theinfluenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT wagstaffehelen theinfluenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT dhillonrishi theinfluenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT maianabellelea theinfluenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT goldblattdavid theinfluenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT stillrachel theinfluenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT bucklandmatthew theinfluenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT gilmourkimberly theinfluenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT grandjeanlouis theinfluenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT torresortizarturo influenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT fenntorrentefernanda influenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT twiggadam influenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT hatcherjames influenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT sasoanja influenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT lamtanya influenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT johnsonmarina influenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT wagstaffehelen influenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT dhillonrishi influenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT maianabellelea influenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT goldblattdavid influenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT stillrachel influenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT bucklandmatthew influenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT gilmourkimberly influenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting AT grandjeanlouis influenceoftimeonthesensitivityofsarscov2serologicaltesting |