_version_ 1784731059968016384
author Bragard, Claude
Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet
Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina
Baptista, Paula
Gonthier, Paolo
Jacques, Marie‐Agnès
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
Justesen, Annemarie Fejer
MacLeod, Alan
Magnusson, Christer Sven
Milonas, Panagiotis
Navas‐Cortes, Juan A
Parnell, Stephen
Potting, Roel
Reignault, Philippe L
Stefani, Emilio
Thulke, Hans‐Hermann
Van der Werf, Wopke
Vicent, Antonio
Zappalà, Lucia
Lucchi, Andrea
Gómez, Pedro
Urek, Gregor
Bernardo, Umberto
Bubici, Giovanni
Carluccio, Anna Vittoria
Chiumenti, Michela
Di Serio, Francesco
Fanelli, Elena
Marzachì, Cristina
Gardi, Ciro
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
de la Peña, Eduardo
Yuen, Jonathan
author_facet Bragard, Claude
Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet
Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina
Baptista, Paula
Gonthier, Paolo
Jacques, Marie‐Agnès
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
Justesen, Annemarie Fejer
MacLeod, Alan
Magnusson, Christer Sven
Milonas, Panagiotis
Navas‐Cortes, Juan A
Parnell, Stephen
Potting, Roel
Reignault, Philippe L
Stefani, Emilio
Thulke, Hans‐Hermann
Van der Werf, Wopke
Vicent, Antonio
Zappalà, Lucia
Lucchi, Andrea
Gómez, Pedro
Urek, Gregor
Bernardo, Umberto
Bubici, Giovanni
Carluccio, Anna Vittoria
Chiumenti, Michela
Di Serio, Francesco
Fanelli, Elena
Marzachì, Cristina
Gardi, Ciro
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
de la Peña, Eduardo
Yuen, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as ‘High risk plants, plant products and other objects’. This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risks posed by plants of Prunus domestica grafted on Prunus cerasifera imported from Ukraine, taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by Ukraine. All pests associated with the commodity were evaluated against specific criteria for their relevance for this opinion. One quarantine pest (Lopholeucaspis japonica), two protected zone quarantine pests (Erwinia amylovora and Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni) and one non‐regulated pest (Eotetranychus prunicola) that fulfilled all relevant criteria were selected for further evaluation. For these four pests, the risk mitigation measures proposed in the technical dossier from Ukraine were evaluated taking into account the possible limiting factors. For the selected pests, an expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. The degree of pest freedom varies among the pests evaluated, with Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni being the pest most frequently expected on the imported plants. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation indicated with 95% certainty that between 9,870 and 10,000 bundles (consisting of 10 plants each) per 10,000 would be free from Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9214634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92146342022-06-29 Commodity risk assessment of Prunus domestica plants from Ukraine Bragard, Claude Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina Baptista, Paula Gonthier, Paolo Jacques, Marie‐Agnès Jaques Miret, Josep Anton Justesen, Annemarie Fejer MacLeod, Alan Magnusson, Christer Sven Milonas, Panagiotis Navas‐Cortes, Juan A Parnell, Stephen Potting, Roel Reignault, Philippe L Stefani, Emilio Thulke, Hans‐Hermann Van der Werf, Wopke Vicent, Antonio Zappalà, Lucia Lucchi, Andrea Gómez, Pedro Urek, Gregor Bernardo, Umberto Bubici, Giovanni Carluccio, Anna Vittoria Chiumenti, Michela Di Serio, Francesco Fanelli, Elena Marzachì, Cristina Gardi, Ciro Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf de la Peña, Eduardo Yuen, Jonathan EFSA J Scientific Opinion The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as ‘High risk plants, plant products and other objects’. This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risks posed by plants of Prunus domestica grafted on Prunus cerasifera imported from Ukraine, taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by Ukraine. All pests associated with the commodity were evaluated against specific criteria for their relevance for this opinion. One quarantine pest (Lopholeucaspis japonica), two protected zone quarantine pests (Erwinia amylovora and Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni) and one non‐regulated pest (Eotetranychus prunicola) that fulfilled all relevant criteria were selected for further evaluation. For these four pests, the risk mitigation measures proposed in the technical dossier from Ukraine were evaluated taking into account the possible limiting factors. For the selected pests, an expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. The degree of pest freedom varies among the pests evaluated, with Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni being the pest most frequently expected on the imported plants. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation indicated with 95% certainty that between 9,870 and 10,000 bundles (consisting of 10 plants each) per 10,000 would be free from Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9214634/ /pubmed/35774585 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7391 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Bragard, Claude
Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet
Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina
Baptista, Paula
Gonthier, Paolo
Jacques, Marie‐Agnès
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
Justesen, Annemarie Fejer
MacLeod, Alan
Magnusson, Christer Sven
Milonas, Panagiotis
Navas‐Cortes, Juan A
Parnell, Stephen
Potting, Roel
Reignault, Philippe L
Stefani, Emilio
Thulke, Hans‐Hermann
Van der Werf, Wopke
Vicent, Antonio
Zappalà, Lucia
Lucchi, Andrea
Gómez, Pedro
Urek, Gregor
Bernardo, Umberto
Bubici, Giovanni
Carluccio, Anna Vittoria
Chiumenti, Michela
Di Serio, Francesco
Fanelli, Elena
Marzachì, Cristina
Gardi, Ciro
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
de la Peña, Eduardo
Yuen, Jonathan
Commodity risk assessment of Prunus domestica plants from Ukraine
title Commodity risk assessment of Prunus domestica plants from Ukraine
title_full Commodity risk assessment of Prunus domestica plants from Ukraine
title_fullStr Commodity risk assessment of Prunus domestica plants from Ukraine
title_full_unstemmed Commodity risk assessment of Prunus domestica plants from Ukraine
title_short Commodity risk assessment of Prunus domestica plants from Ukraine
title_sort commodity risk assessment of prunus domestica plants from ukraine
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35774585
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7391
work_keys_str_mv AT commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT bragardclaude commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT chatzivassiliouelisavet commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT dehnenschmutzkatharina commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT baptistapaula commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT gonthierpaolo commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT jacquesmarieagnes commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT jaquesmiretjosepanton commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT justesenannemariefejer commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT macleodalan commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT magnussonchristersven commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT milonaspanagiotis commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT navascortesjuana commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT parnellstephen commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT pottingroel commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT reignaultphilippel commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT stefaniemilio commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT thulkehanshermann commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT vanderwerfwopke commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT vicentantonio commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT zappalalucia commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT lucchiandrea commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT gomezpedro commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT urekgregor commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT bernardoumberto commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT bubicigiovanni commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT carluccioannavittoria commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT chiumentimichela commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT diseriofrancesco commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT fanellielena commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT marzachicristina commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT gardiciro commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT mosbachschulzolaf commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT delapenaeduardo commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine
AT yuenjonathan commodityriskassessmentofprunusdomesticaplantsfromukraine