Cargando…

Development and validation of reassigned CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE-based models for lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction

BACKGROUND: The majority of lung cancer(LC) patients are diagnosed at advanced stage with a poor prognosis. However, there is still no ideal diagnostic and prognostic prediction model for lung cancer. METHODS: Data of CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE test of patients with LC and benign lung diseases (BLDs) or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Jingmin, Sun, Yan, Wang, Ke, Wang, Zhiyi, Li, Duo, Fan, Meng, Bu, Xiang, Chen, Jun, Wu, Zhiquan, Geng, Hui, Wu, Jiamei, Xu, Ying, Chen, Mingwei, Ren, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35729538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09728-5
_version_ 1784731116471582720
author Yuan, Jingmin
Sun, Yan
Wang, Ke
Wang, Zhiyi
Li, Duo
Fan, Meng
Bu, Xiang
Chen, Jun
Wu, Zhiquan
Geng, Hui
Wu, Jiamei
Xu, Ying
Chen, Mingwei
Ren, Hui
author_facet Yuan, Jingmin
Sun, Yan
Wang, Ke
Wang, Zhiyi
Li, Duo
Fan, Meng
Bu, Xiang
Chen, Jun
Wu, Zhiquan
Geng, Hui
Wu, Jiamei
Xu, Ying
Chen, Mingwei
Ren, Hui
author_sort Yuan, Jingmin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The majority of lung cancer(LC) patients are diagnosed at advanced stage with a poor prognosis. However, there is still no ideal diagnostic and prognostic prediction model for lung cancer. METHODS: Data of CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE test of patients with LC and benign lung diseases (BLDs) or healthy people from Physical Examination Center was collected. Samples were divided into three data sets as needed. Reassign three kinds of tumor markers (TMs) according to their distribution characteristics in different populations. Diagnostic and prognostic models were thus established, and independent validation was conducted with other data sets. RESULTS: The diagnostic prediction model showed good discrimination ability: the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) differentiated LC from healthy people and BLDs (diagnosed within 2 months), being 0.88 and 0.84 respectively. Meanwhile, the prognostic prediction model did great in prediction: AUC in training data set and test data set were 0.85 and 0.8 respectively. CONCLUSION: Reassigned CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE can effectively predict the diagnosis and prognosis of LC. Compared with the same TMs that were considered individually, this diagnostic prediction model can identify high-risk population for LC screening more accurately. The prognostic prediction model could be helpful in making more scientific treatment and follow-up plans for patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09728-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9214980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92149802022-06-23 Development and validation of reassigned CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE-based models for lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction Yuan, Jingmin Sun, Yan Wang, Ke Wang, Zhiyi Li, Duo Fan, Meng Bu, Xiang Chen, Jun Wu, Zhiquan Geng, Hui Wu, Jiamei Xu, Ying Chen, Mingwei Ren, Hui BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: The majority of lung cancer(LC) patients are diagnosed at advanced stage with a poor prognosis. However, there is still no ideal diagnostic and prognostic prediction model for lung cancer. METHODS: Data of CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE test of patients with LC and benign lung diseases (BLDs) or healthy people from Physical Examination Center was collected. Samples were divided into three data sets as needed. Reassign three kinds of tumor markers (TMs) according to their distribution characteristics in different populations. Diagnostic and prognostic models were thus established, and independent validation was conducted with other data sets. RESULTS: The diagnostic prediction model showed good discrimination ability: the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) differentiated LC from healthy people and BLDs (diagnosed within 2 months), being 0.88 and 0.84 respectively. Meanwhile, the prognostic prediction model did great in prediction: AUC in training data set and test data set were 0.85 and 0.8 respectively. CONCLUSION: Reassigned CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE can effectively predict the diagnosis and prognosis of LC. Compared with the same TMs that were considered individually, this diagnostic prediction model can identify high-risk population for LC screening more accurately. The prognostic prediction model could be helpful in making more scientific treatment and follow-up plans for patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09728-5. BioMed Central 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9214980/ /pubmed/35729538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09728-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Yuan, Jingmin
Sun, Yan
Wang, Ke
Wang, Zhiyi
Li, Duo
Fan, Meng
Bu, Xiang
Chen, Jun
Wu, Zhiquan
Geng, Hui
Wu, Jiamei
Xu, Ying
Chen, Mingwei
Ren, Hui
Development and validation of reassigned CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE-based models for lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction
title Development and validation of reassigned CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE-based models for lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction
title_full Development and validation of reassigned CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE-based models for lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction
title_fullStr Development and validation of reassigned CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE-based models for lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of reassigned CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE-based models for lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction
title_short Development and validation of reassigned CEA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE-based models for lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction
title_sort development and validation of reassigned cea, cyfra21-1 and nse-based models for lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9214980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35729538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09728-5
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanjingmin developmentandvalidationofreassignedceacyfra211andnsebasedmodelsforlungcancerdiagnosisandprognosisprediction
AT sunyan developmentandvalidationofreassignedceacyfra211andnsebasedmodelsforlungcancerdiagnosisandprognosisprediction
AT wangke developmentandvalidationofreassignedceacyfra211andnsebasedmodelsforlungcancerdiagnosisandprognosisprediction
AT wangzhiyi developmentandvalidationofreassignedceacyfra211andnsebasedmodelsforlungcancerdiagnosisandprognosisprediction
AT liduo developmentandvalidationofreassignedceacyfra211andnsebasedmodelsforlungcancerdiagnosisandprognosisprediction
AT fanmeng developmentandvalidationofreassignedceacyfra211andnsebasedmodelsforlungcancerdiagnosisandprognosisprediction
AT buxiang developmentandvalidationofreassignedceacyfra211andnsebasedmodelsforlungcancerdiagnosisandprognosisprediction
AT chenjun developmentandvalidationofreassignedceacyfra211andnsebasedmodelsforlungcancerdiagnosisandprognosisprediction
AT wuzhiquan developmentandvalidationofreassignedceacyfra211andnsebasedmodelsforlungcancerdiagnosisandprognosisprediction
AT genghui developmentandvalidationofreassignedceacyfra211andnsebasedmodelsforlungcancerdiagnosisandprognosisprediction
AT wujiamei developmentandvalidationofreassignedceacyfra211andnsebasedmodelsforlungcancerdiagnosisandprognosisprediction
AT xuying developmentandvalidationofreassignedceacyfra211andnsebasedmodelsforlungcancerdiagnosisandprognosisprediction
AT chenmingwei developmentandvalidationofreassignedceacyfra211andnsebasedmodelsforlungcancerdiagnosisandprognosisprediction
AT renhui developmentandvalidationofreassignedceacyfra211andnsebasedmodelsforlungcancerdiagnosisandprognosisprediction