Cargando…

Sustainability capacity of a vegetable gardening intervention for cancer survivors

BACKGROUND: Health behavior interventions, especially those that promote improved diet and physical activity, are increasingly directed toward cancer survivors given their burgeoning numbers and high risk for comorbidity and functional decline. However, for health behavior interventions to achieve m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cases, Mallory G., Blair, Cindy K., Hendricks, Peter S., Smith, Kerry, Snyder, Scott, Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9215023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35733142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13644-5
_version_ 1784731126784327680
author Cases, Mallory G.
Blair, Cindy K.
Hendricks, Peter S.
Smith, Kerry
Snyder, Scott
Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy
author_facet Cases, Mallory G.
Blair, Cindy K.
Hendricks, Peter S.
Smith, Kerry
Snyder, Scott
Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy
author_sort Cases, Mallory G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health behavior interventions, especially those that promote improved diet and physical activity, are increasingly directed toward cancer survivors given their burgeoning numbers and high risk for comorbidity and functional decline. However, for health behavior interventions to achieve maximal public health impact, sustainability at both the individual and organizational levels is crucial. The current study aimed to assess the individual and organizational sustainability of the Harvest for Health mentored vegetable gardening intervention among cancer survivors. METHODS: Telephone surveys were conducted among 100 cancer survivors (mean age 63 years; primarily breast cancer) completing one-of-two Harvest for Health feasibility trials. Surveys ascertained whether participants continued gardening, and if so, whether they had expanded their gardens. Additionally, surveys were emailed to 23 stakeholders (Cooperative Extension county agents, cancer support group leaders, and healthcare representatives) who were asked to rate the intervention’s ability to generate sustained service and produce benefits over time using the eight-domain Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT). RESULTS: The survey among cancer survivors (91.9% response rate) indicated that 85.7% continued gardening throughout the 12 months following intervention completion; 47.3% expanded their gardens beyond the space of the original intervention. Moreover, 5.5% of cancer survivors enrolled in the certification program to become Extension Master Gardeners. The survey among stakeholders generated a similar response rate (i.e., 91.3%) and favorable scores. Of the possible maximum of 7 points on the PSAT, the gardening intervention’s “Overall Capacity for Sustainability” scored 5.7 (81.4% of the maximum score), with subscales for “Funding Stability” scoring the lowest though still favorably (5.0) and “Program Evaluation” scoring the highest (6.3). CONCLUSIONS: Data support the sustainability capacity of the Harvest for Health vegetable gardening intervention for cancer survivors. Indeed, few interventions have proven as durable in terms of individual sustainability. Furthermore, Harvest for Health’s overall organizational score of 5.7 on the PSAT is considered strong when compared to a previous review of over 250 programs, where the mean overall organizational PSAT score was 4.84. Thus, solutions for long-term funding are currently being explored to support this strong, holistic program that is directed toward this vulnerable and growing population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02150148
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9215023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92150232022-06-23 Sustainability capacity of a vegetable gardening intervention for cancer survivors Cases, Mallory G. Blair, Cindy K. Hendricks, Peter S. Smith, Kerry Snyder, Scott Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Health behavior interventions, especially those that promote improved diet and physical activity, are increasingly directed toward cancer survivors given their burgeoning numbers and high risk for comorbidity and functional decline. However, for health behavior interventions to achieve maximal public health impact, sustainability at both the individual and organizational levels is crucial. The current study aimed to assess the individual and organizational sustainability of the Harvest for Health mentored vegetable gardening intervention among cancer survivors. METHODS: Telephone surveys were conducted among 100 cancer survivors (mean age 63 years; primarily breast cancer) completing one-of-two Harvest for Health feasibility trials. Surveys ascertained whether participants continued gardening, and if so, whether they had expanded their gardens. Additionally, surveys were emailed to 23 stakeholders (Cooperative Extension county agents, cancer support group leaders, and healthcare representatives) who were asked to rate the intervention’s ability to generate sustained service and produce benefits over time using the eight-domain Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT). RESULTS: The survey among cancer survivors (91.9% response rate) indicated that 85.7% continued gardening throughout the 12 months following intervention completion; 47.3% expanded their gardens beyond the space of the original intervention. Moreover, 5.5% of cancer survivors enrolled in the certification program to become Extension Master Gardeners. The survey among stakeholders generated a similar response rate (i.e., 91.3%) and favorable scores. Of the possible maximum of 7 points on the PSAT, the gardening intervention’s “Overall Capacity for Sustainability” scored 5.7 (81.4% of the maximum score), with subscales for “Funding Stability” scoring the lowest though still favorably (5.0) and “Program Evaluation” scoring the highest (6.3). CONCLUSIONS: Data support the sustainability capacity of the Harvest for Health vegetable gardening intervention for cancer survivors. Indeed, few interventions have proven as durable in terms of individual sustainability. Furthermore, Harvest for Health’s overall organizational score of 5.7 on the PSAT is considered strong when compared to a previous review of over 250 programs, where the mean overall organizational PSAT score was 4.84. Thus, solutions for long-term funding are currently being explored to support this strong, holistic program that is directed toward this vulnerable and growing population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02150148 BioMed Central 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9215023/ /pubmed/35733142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13644-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Cases, Mallory G.
Blair, Cindy K.
Hendricks, Peter S.
Smith, Kerry
Snyder, Scott
Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy
Sustainability capacity of a vegetable gardening intervention for cancer survivors
title Sustainability capacity of a vegetable gardening intervention for cancer survivors
title_full Sustainability capacity of a vegetable gardening intervention for cancer survivors
title_fullStr Sustainability capacity of a vegetable gardening intervention for cancer survivors
title_full_unstemmed Sustainability capacity of a vegetable gardening intervention for cancer survivors
title_short Sustainability capacity of a vegetable gardening intervention for cancer survivors
title_sort sustainability capacity of a vegetable gardening intervention for cancer survivors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9215023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35733142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13644-5
work_keys_str_mv AT casesmalloryg sustainabilitycapacityofavegetablegardeninginterventionforcancersurvivors
AT blaircindyk sustainabilitycapacityofavegetablegardeninginterventionforcancersurvivors
AT hendrickspeters sustainabilitycapacityofavegetablegardeninginterventionforcancersurvivors
AT smithkerry sustainabilitycapacityofavegetablegardeninginterventionforcancersurvivors
AT snyderscott sustainabilitycapacityofavegetablegardeninginterventionforcancersurvivors
AT demarkwahnefriedwendy sustainabilitycapacityofavegetablegardeninginterventionforcancersurvivors