Cargando…

Two-Year Event-Free Survival Prediction in DLBCL Patients Based on In Vivo Radiomics and Clinical Parameters

PURPOSE: For the identification of high-risk patients in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), we investigated the prognostic significance of in vivo radiomics derived from baseline [(18)F]FDG PET/CT and clinical parameters. METHODS: Pre-treatment [(18)F]FDG PET/CT scans of 85 patients diagnosed wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ritter, Zsombor, Papp, László, Zámbó, Katalin, Tóth, Zoltán, Dezső, Dániel, Veres, Dániel Sándor, Máthé, Domokos, Budán, Ferenc, Karádi, Éva, Balikó, Anett, Pajor, László, Szomor, Árpád, Schmidt, Erzsébet, Alizadeh, Hussain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9216187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35756658
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.820136
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: For the identification of high-risk patients in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), we investigated the prognostic significance of in vivo radiomics derived from baseline [(18)F]FDG PET/CT and clinical parameters. METHODS: Pre-treatment [(18)F]FDG PET/CT scans of 85 patients diagnosed with DLBCL were assessed. The scans were carried out in two clinical centers. Two-year event-free survival (EFS) was defined. After delineation of lymphoma lesions, conventional PET parameters and in vivo radiomics were extracted. For 2-year EFS prognosis assessment, the Center 1 dataset was utilized as the training set and underwent automated machine learning analysis. The dataset of Center 2 was utilized as an independent test set to validate the established predictive model built by the dataset of Center 1. RESULTS: The automated machine learning analysis of the Center 1 dataset revealed that the most important features for building 2-year EFS are as follows: max diameter, neighbor gray tone difference matrix (NGTDM) busyness, total lesion glycolysis, total metabolic tumor volume, and NGTDM coarseness. The predictive model built on the Center 1 dataset yielded 79% sensitivity, 83% specificity, 69% positive predictive value, 89% negative predictive value, and 0.85 AUC by evaluating the Center 2 dataset. CONCLUSION: Based on our dual-center retrospective analysis, predicting 2-year EFS built on imaging features is feasible by utilizing high-performance automated machine learning.