Cargando…

A review of fetal cardiac monitoring, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries

There is limited evidence regarding the utility of fetal monitoring during pregnancy, particularly during labor and delivery. Developed countries rely on consensus ‘best practices’ of obstetrics and gynecology professional societies to guide their protocols and policies. Protocols are often driven b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valderrama, Camilo E, Ketabi, Nasim, Marzbanrad, Faezeh, Rohloff, Peter, Clifford, Gari D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9216228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33105122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/abc4c7
_version_ 1784731379012993024
author Valderrama, Camilo E
Ketabi, Nasim
Marzbanrad, Faezeh
Rohloff, Peter
Clifford, Gari D
author_facet Valderrama, Camilo E
Ketabi, Nasim
Marzbanrad, Faezeh
Rohloff, Peter
Clifford, Gari D
author_sort Valderrama, Camilo E
collection PubMed
description There is limited evidence regarding the utility of fetal monitoring during pregnancy, particularly during labor and delivery. Developed countries rely on consensus ‘best practices’ of obstetrics and gynecology professional societies to guide their protocols and policies. Protocols are often driven by the desire to be as safe as possible and avoid litigation, regardless of the cost of downstream treatment. In high-resource settings, there may be a justification for this approach. In low-resource settings, in particular, interventions can be costly and lead to adverse outcomes in subsequent pregnancies. Therefore, it is essential to consider the evidence and cost of different fetal monitoring approaches, particularly in the context of treatment and care in low-to-middle income countries. This article reviews the standard methods used for fetal monitoring, with particular emphasis on fetal cardiac assessment, which is a reliable indicator of fetal well-being. An overview of fetal monitoring practices in low-to-middle income counties, including perinatal care access challenges, is also presented. Finally, an overview of how mobile technology may help reduce barriers to perinatal care access in low-resource settings is provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9216228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92162282022-06-22 A review of fetal cardiac monitoring, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries Valderrama, Camilo E Ketabi, Nasim Marzbanrad, Faezeh Rohloff, Peter Clifford, Gari D Physiol Meas Article There is limited evidence regarding the utility of fetal monitoring during pregnancy, particularly during labor and delivery. Developed countries rely on consensus ‘best practices’ of obstetrics and gynecology professional societies to guide their protocols and policies. Protocols are often driven by the desire to be as safe as possible and avoid litigation, regardless of the cost of downstream treatment. In high-resource settings, there may be a justification for this approach. In low-resource settings, in particular, interventions can be costly and lead to adverse outcomes in subsequent pregnancies. Therefore, it is essential to consider the evidence and cost of different fetal monitoring approaches, particularly in the context of treatment and care in low-to-middle income countries. This article reviews the standard methods used for fetal monitoring, with particular emphasis on fetal cardiac assessment, which is a reliable indicator of fetal well-being. An overview of fetal monitoring practices in low-to-middle income counties, including perinatal care access challenges, is also presented. Finally, an overview of how mobile technology may help reduce barriers to perinatal care access in low-resource settings is provided. 2020-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9216228/ /pubmed/33105122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/abc4c7 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Original Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.
spellingShingle Article
Valderrama, Camilo E
Ketabi, Nasim
Marzbanrad, Faezeh
Rohloff, Peter
Clifford, Gari D
A review of fetal cardiac monitoring, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries
title A review of fetal cardiac monitoring, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries
title_full A review of fetal cardiac monitoring, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries
title_fullStr A review of fetal cardiac monitoring, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries
title_full_unstemmed A review of fetal cardiac monitoring, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries
title_short A review of fetal cardiac monitoring, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries
title_sort review of fetal cardiac monitoring, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9216228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33105122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/abc4c7
work_keys_str_mv AT valderramacamiloe areviewoffetalcardiacmonitoringwithafocusonlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT ketabinasim areviewoffetalcardiacmonitoringwithafocusonlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT marzbanradfaezeh areviewoffetalcardiacmonitoringwithafocusonlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT rohloffpeter areviewoffetalcardiacmonitoringwithafocusonlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT cliffordgarid areviewoffetalcardiacmonitoringwithafocusonlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT valderramacamiloe reviewoffetalcardiacmonitoringwithafocusonlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT ketabinasim reviewoffetalcardiacmonitoringwithafocusonlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT marzbanradfaezeh reviewoffetalcardiacmonitoringwithafocusonlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT rohloffpeter reviewoffetalcardiacmonitoringwithafocusonlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT cliffordgarid reviewoffetalcardiacmonitoringwithafocusonlowandmiddleincomecountries