Cargando…

Analyzing COVID-19 disinformation on Twitter using the hashtags #scamdemic and #plandemic: Retrospective study

INTRODUCTION: The use of social media during the COVID-19 pandemic has led to an "infodemic" of mis- and disinformation with potentially grave consequences. To explore means of counteracting disinformation, we analyzed tweets containing the hashtags #Scamdemic and #Plandemic. METHODS: Usin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lanier, Heather D., Diaz, Marlon I., Saleh, Sameh N., Lehmann, Christoph U., Medford, Richard J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9216575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35731785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268409
_version_ 1784731455400706048
author Lanier, Heather D.
Diaz, Marlon I.
Saleh, Sameh N.
Lehmann, Christoph U.
Medford, Richard J.
author_facet Lanier, Heather D.
Diaz, Marlon I.
Saleh, Sameh N.
Lehmann, Christoph U.
Medford, Richard J.
author_sort Lanier, Heather D.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The use of social media during the COVID-19 pandemic has led to an "infodemic" of mis- and disinformation with potentially grave consequences. To explore means of counteracting disinformation, we analyzed tweets containing the hashtags #Scamdemic and #Plandemic. METHODS: Using a Twitter scraping tool called twint, we collected 419,269 English-language tweets that contained “#Scamdemic” or “#Plandemic” posted in 2020. Using the Twitter application-programming interface, we extracted the same tweets (by tweet ID) with additional user metadata. We explored descriptive statistics of tweets including their content and user profiles, analyzed sentiments and emotions, performed topic modeling, and determined tweet availability in both datasets. RESULTS: After removal of retweets, replies, non-English tweets, or duplicate tweets, 40,081 users tweeted 227,067 times using our selected hashtags. The mean weekly sentiment was overall negative for both hashtags. One in five users who used these hashtags were suspended by Twitter by January 2021. Suspended accounts had an average of 610 followers and an average of 6.7 tweets per user, while active users had an average of 472 followers and an average of 5.4 tweets per user. The most frequent tweet topic was “Complaints against mandates introduced during the pandemic” (79,670 tweets), which included complaints against masks, social distancing, and closures. DISCUSSION: While social media has democratized speech, it also permits users to disseminate potentially unverified or misleading information that endangers people’s lives and public health interventions. Characterizing tweets and users that use hashtags associated with COVID-19 pandemic denial allowed us to understand the extent of misinformation. With the preponderance of inaccessible original tweets, we concluded that posters were in denial of the COVID-19 pandemic and sought to disperse related mis- or disinformation resulting in suspension. CONCLUSION: Leveraging 227,067 tweets with the hashtags #scamdemic and #plandemic in 2020, we were able to elucidate important trends in public disinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9216575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92165752022-06-23 Analyzing COVID-19 disinformation on Twitter using the hashtags #scamdemic and #plandemic: Retrospective study Lanier, Heather D. Diaz, Marlon I. Saleh, Sameh N. Lehmann, Christoph U. Medford, Richard J. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: The use of social media during the COVID-19 pandemic has led to an "infodemic" of mis- and disinformation with potentially grave consequences. To explore means of counteracting disinformation, we analyzed tweets containing the hashtags #Scamdemic and #Plandemic. METHODS: Using a Twitter scraping tool called twint, we collected 419,269 English-language tweets that contained “#Scamdemic” or “#Plandemic” posted in 2020. Using the Twitter application-programming interface, we extracted the same tweets (by tweet ID) with additional user metadata. We explored descriptive statistics of tweets including their content and user profiles, analyzed sentiments and emotions, performed topic modeling, and determined tweet availability in both datasets. RESULTS: After removal of retweets, replies, non-English tweets, or duplicate tweets, 40,081 users tweeted 227,067 times using our selected hashtags. The mean weekly sentiment was overall negative for both hashtags. One in five users who used these hashtags were suspended by Twitter by January 2021. Suspended accounts had an average of 610 followers and an average of 6.7 tweets per user, while active users had an average of 472 followers and an average of 5.4 tweets per user. The most frequent tweet topic was “Complaints against mandates introduced during the pandemic” (79,670 tweets), which included complaints against masks, social distancing, and closures. DISCUSSION: While social media has democratized speech, it also permits users to disseminate potentially unverified or misleading information that endangers people’s lives and public health interventions. Characterizing tweets and users that use hashtags associated with COVID-19 pandemic denial allowed us to understand the extent of misinformation. With the preponderance of inaccessible original tweets, we concluded that posters were in denial of the COVID-19 pandemic and sought to disperse related mis- or disinformation resulting in suspension. CONCLUSION: Leveraging 227,067 tweets with the hashtags #scamdemic and #plandemic in 2020, we were able to elucidate important trends in public disinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine. Public Library of Science 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9216575/ /pubmed/35731785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268409 Text en © 2022 Lanier et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lanier, Heather D.
Diaz, Marlon I.
Saleh, Sameh N.
Lehmann, Christoph U.
Medford, Richard J.
Analyzing COVID-19 disinformation on Twitter using the hashtags #scamdemic and #plandemic: Retrospective study
title Analyzing COVID-19 disinformation on Twitter using the hashtags #scamdemic and #plandemic: Retrospective study
title_full Analyzing COVID-19 disinformation on Twitter using the hashtags #scamdemic and #plandemic: Retrospective study
title_fullStr Analyzing COVID-19 disinformation on Twitter using the hashtags #scamdemic and #plandemic: Retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing COVID-19 disinformation on Twitter using the hashtags #scamdemic and #plandemic: Retrospective study
title_short Analyzing COVID-19 disinformation on Twitter using the hashtags #scamdemic and #plandemic: Retrospective study
title_sort analyzing covid-19 disinformation on twitter using the hashtags #scamdemic and #plandemic: retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9216575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35731785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268409
work_keys_str_mv AT lanierheatherd analyzingcovid19disinformationontwitterusingthehashtagsscamdemicandplandemicretrospectivestudy
AT diazmarloni analyzingcovid19disinformationontwitterusingthehashtagsscamdemicandplandemicretrospectivestudy
AT salehsamehn analyzingcovid19disinformationontwitterusingthehashtagsscamdemicandplandemicretrospectivestudy
AT lehmannchristophu analyzingcovid19disinformationontwitterusingthehashtagsscamdemicandplandemicretrospectivestudy
AT medfordrichardj analyzingcovid19disinformationontwitterusingthehashtagsscamdemicandplandemicretrospectivestudy