Cargando…

The efficacy of sampling strategies for estimating scabies prevalence

BACKGROUND: Estimating community level scabies prevalence is crucial for targeting interventions to areas of greatest need. The World Health Organisation recommends sampling at the unit of households or schools, but there is presently no standardised approach to scabies prevalence assessment. Conseq...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tellioglu, Nefel, Chisholm, Rebecca H., McVernon, Jodie, Geard, Nicholas, Campbell, Patricia Therese
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9216578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35679325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010456
_version_ 1784731456350715904
author Tellioglu, Nefel
Chisholm, Rebecca H.
McVernon, Jodie
Geard, Nicholas
Campbell, Patricia Therese
author_facet Tellioglu, Nefel
Chisholm, Rebecca H.
McVernon, Jodie
Geard, Nicholas
Campbell, Patricia Therese
author_sort Tellioglu, Nefel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Estimating community level scabies prevalence is crucial for targeting interventions to areas of greatest need. The World Health Organisation recommends sampling at the unit of households or schools, but there is presently no standardised approach to scabies prevalence assessment. Consequently, a wide range of sampling sizes and methods have been used. As both prevalence and drivers of transmission vary across populations, there is a need to understand how sampling strategies for estimating scabies prevalence interact with local epidemiology to affect the accuracy of prevalence estimates. METHODS: We used a simulation-based approach to compare the efficacy of different scabies sampling strategies. First, we generated synthetic populations broadly representative of remote Australian Indigenous communities and assigned a scabies status to individuals to achieve a specified prevalence using different assumptions about scabies epidemiology. Second, we calculated an observed prevalence for different sampling methods and sizes. RESULTS: The distribution of prevalence in subpopulation groups can vary substantially when the underlying scabies assignment method changes. Across all of the scabies assignment methods combined, the simple random sampling method produces the narrowest 95% confidence interval for all sample sizes. The household sampling method introduces higher variance compared to simple random sampling when the assignment of scabies includes a household-specific component. The school sampling method overestimates community prevalence when the assignment of scabies includes an age-specific component. DISCUSSION: Our results indicate that there are interactions between transmission assumptions and surveillance strategies, emphasizing the need for understanding scabies transmission dynamics. We suggest using the simple random sampling method for estimating scabies prevalence. Our approach can be adapted to various populations and diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9216578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92165782022-06-23 The efficacy of sampling strategies for estimating scabies prevalence Tellioglu, Nefel Chisholm, Rebecca H. McVernon, Jodie Geard, Nicholas Campbell, Patricia Therese PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Estimating community level scabies prevalence is crucial for targeting interventions to areas of greatest need. The World Health Organisation recommends sampling at the unit of households or schools, but there is presently no standardised approach to scabies prevalence assessment. Consequently, a wide range of sampling sizes and methods have been used. As both prevalence and drivers of transmission vary across populations, there is a need to understand how sampling strategies for estimating scabies prevalence interact with local epidemiology to affect the accuracy of prevalence estimates. METHODS: We used a simulation-based approach to compare the efficacy of different scabies sampling strategies. First, we generated synthetic populations broadly representative of remote Australian Indigenous communities and assigned a scabies status to individuals to achieve a specified prevalence using different assumptions about scabies epidemiology. Second, we calculated an observed prevalence for different sampling methods and sizes. RESULTS: The distribution of prevalence in subpopulation groups can vary substantially when the underlying scabies assignment method changes. Across all of the scabies assignment methods combined, the simple random sampling method produces the narrowest 95% confidence interval for all sample sizes. The household sampling method introduces higher variance compared to simple random sampling when the assignment of scabies includes a household-specific component. The school sampling method overestimates community prevalence when the assignment of scabies includes an age-specific component. DISCUSSION: Our results indicate that there are interactions between transmission assumptions and surveillance strategies, emphasizing the need for understanding scabies transmission dynamics. We suggest using the simple random sampling method for estimating scabies prevalence. Our approach can be adapted to various populations and diseases. Public Library of Science 2022-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9216578/ /pubmed/35679325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010456 Text en © 2022 Tellioglu et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tellioglu, Nefel
Chisholm, Rebecca H.
McVernon, Jodie
Geard, Nicholas
Campbell, Patricia Therese
The efficacy of sampling strategies for estimating scabies prevalence
title The efficacy of sampling strategies for estimating scabies prevalence
title_full The efficacy of sampling strategies for estimating scabies prevalence
title_fullStr The efficacy of sampling strategies for estimating scabies prevalence
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of sampling strategies for estimating scabies prevalence
title_short The efficacy of sampling strategies for estimating scabies prevalence
title_sort efficacy of sampling strategies for estimating scabies prevalence
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9216578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35679325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010456
work_keys_str_mv AT tellioglunefel theefficacyofsamplingstrategiesforestimatingscabiesprevalence
AT chisholmrebeccah theefficacyofsamplingstrategiesforestimatingscabiesprevalence
AT mcvernonjodie theefficacyofsamplingstrategiesforestimatingscabiesprevalence
AT geardnicholas theefficacyofsamplingstrategiesforestimatingscabiesprevalence
AT campbellpatriciatherese theefficacyofsamplingstrategiesforestimatingscabiesprevalence
AT tellioglunefel efficacyofsamplingstrategiesforestimatingscabiesprevalence
AT chisholmrebeccah efficacyofsamplingstrategiesforestimatingscabiesprevalence
AT mcvernonjodie efficacyofsamplingstrategiesforestimatingscabiesprevalence
AT geardnicholas efficacyofsamplingstrategiesforestimatingscabiesprevalence
AT campbellpatriciatherese efficacyofsamplingstrategiesforestimatingscabiesprevalence