Cargando…

History and best practices of captive bolt euthanasia for swine

The definition of animal welfare includes how an animal dies. As such, euthanasia is intrinsically linked to animal welfare, and ensuring a good death through effective, safe, and validated practices is a critical piece of promoting positive animal welfare. The objective of this review is to provide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, Karly N, Deen, John, Karczewski, Jerry, Zhitnitskiy, Perle E, Vogel, Kurt D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9217757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35755133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac065
_version_ 1784731724538707968
author Anderson, Karly N
Deen, John
Karczewski, Jerry
Zhitnitskiy, Perle E
Vogel, Kurt D
author_facet Anderson, Karly N
Deen, John
Karczewski, Jerry
Zhitnitskiy, Perle E
Vogel, Kurt D
author_sort Anderson, Karly N
collection PubMed
description The definition of animal welfare includes how an animal dies. As such, euthanasia is intrinsically linked to animal welfare, and ensuring a good death through effective, safe, and validated practices is a critical piece of promoting positive animal welfare. The objective of this review is to provide a better understanding of the literature on the euthanasia of swine via penetrating captive bolt (PCB) and nonpenetrating captive bolt (NPCB), as well as a history of captive bolt use, and indicators of sensibility and insensibility. To do this, we performed a systematic review that included 30 peer-reviewed articles and 17 other publications. NPCB devices have been validated as an effective single-step euthanasia method for neonatal and preweaning swine, as well as a two-step euthanasia method for nursery swine. PCB devices have been validated as an effective euthanasia method for nursery and market swine up to 120 kg, but further investigation is required for the use of captive bolt devices on mature breeding sows and boars.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9217757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92177572022-06-23 History and best practices of captive bolt euthanasia for swine Anderson, Karly N Deen, John Karczewski, Jerry Zhitnitskiy, Perle E Vogel, Kurt D Transl Anim Sci Animal Health and Well Being The definition of animal welfare includes how an animal dies. As such, euthanasia is intrinsically linked to animal welfare, and ensuring a good death through effective, safe, and validated practices is a critical piece of promoting positive animal welfare. The objective of this review is to provide a better understanding of the literature on the euthanasia of swine via penetrating captive bolt (PCB) and nonpenetrating captive bolt (NPCB), as well as a history of captive bolt use, and indicators of sensibility and insensibility. To do this, we performed a systematic review that included 30 peer-reviewed articles and 17 other publications. NPCB devices have been validated as an effective single-step euthanasia method for neonatal and preweaning swine, as well as a two-step euthanasia method for nursery swine. PCB devices have been validated as an effective euthanasia method for nursery and market swine up to 120 kg, but further investigation is required for the use of captive bolt devices on mature breeding sows and boars. Oxford University Press 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9217757/ /pubmed/35755133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac065 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Animal Health and Well Being
Anderson, Karly N
Deen, John
Karczewski, Jerry
Zhitnitskiy, Perle E
Vogel, Kurt D
History and best practices of captive bolt euthanasia for swine
title History and best practices of captive bolt euthanasia for swine
title_full History and best practices of captive bolt euthanasia for swine
title_fullStr History and best practices of captive bolt euthanasia for swine
title_full_unstemmed History and best practices of captive bolt euthanasia for swine
title_short History and best practices of captive bolt euthanasia for swine
title_sort history and best practices of captive bolt euthanasia for swine
topic Animal Health and Well Being
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9217757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35755133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac065
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonkarlyn historyandbestpracticesofcaptivebolteuthanasiaforswine
AT deenjohn historyandbestpracticesofcaptivebolteuthanasiaforswine
AT karczewskijerry historyandbestpracticesofcaptivebolteuthanasiaforswine
AT zhitnitskiyperlee historyandbestpracticesofcaptivebolteuthanasiaforswine
AT vogelkurtd historyandbestpracticesofcaptivebolteuthanasiaforswine