Cargando…
Distance from the magnification device contributes to differences in lower leg length measured in patients with TSF correction
INTRODUCTION: In absence of deformity or injury of the contralateral leg, the contralateral leg length is used to plan limb lengthening. Length variability on long-leg weight-bearing radiographs (LLR) can lead to inaccurate deformity correction. The aim of the study was to (1) examine the variabilit...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9217775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33674962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03831-1 |
_version_ | 1784731729993400320 |
---|---|
author | Ahrend, Marc-Daniel Rühle, Michael Springer, Fabian Baumgartner, Heiko |
author_facet | Ahrend, Marc-Daniel Rühle, Michael Springer, Fabian Baumgartner, Heiko |
author_sort | Ahrend, Marc-Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In absence of deformity or injury of the contralateral leg, the contralateral leg length is used to plan limb lengthening. Length variability on long-leg weight-bearing radiographs (LLR) can lead to inaccurate deformity correction. The aim of the study was to (1) examine the variability of the measured limb length on LLR and (2) to examine the influence of the position of the magnification device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The limb lengths of 38 patients during deformity correction with a taylor-spatial-frame were measured retrospectively on 7.3 ± 2.6 (4–13) LLR per patient. The measured length of the untreated limb between LLR were used to determine length variability between LLR in each patient. To answer the secondary aim, we took LLR from a 90 cm validation distance. A magnification device was placed in different positions: at the middle of the 90 cm distance (z-position), 5 cm anterior and 5 cm posterior from the z-position, at the bottom and top of the validation distance as well as 5 cm medial and 15 cm lateral from the z-position. RESULTS: The measured length variability ranged within a patient from 10 to 50 mm. 76% of patients had a measured limb length difference of ≥ 2 cm between taken LLR. Compared to length measurement of the 90 cm test object with the magnification device in the z-position (90.1 cm), positioning the device 5 cm anterior led to smaller (88.6 cm) and 5 cm posterior led to larger measurements (91.7 cm). The measured length with the magnification device at the bottom, top, medial or lateral (90.4; 89.9; 90.2; 89.8 cm) to the object differed not relevantly. CONCLUSIONS: High variability of limb length between different LLR within one patient was observed. This can result from different positions of the magnification device in the sagittal plane. These small changes in positioning the device should be avoided to achieve accurate deformity correction and bone lengthening. This should be considered for all length and size measurements on radiographs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9217775 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92177752022-06-24 Distance from the magnification device contributes to differences in lower leg length measured in patients with TSF correction Ahrend, Marc-Daniel Rühle, Michael Springer, Fabian Baumgartner, Heiko Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Trauma Surgery INTRODUCTION: In absence of deformity or injury of the contralateral leg, the contralateral leg length is used to plan limb lengthening. Length variability on long-leg weight-bearing radiographs (LLR) can lead to inaccurate deformity correction. The aim of the study was to (1) examine the variability of the measured limb length on LLR and (2) to examine the influence of the position of the magnification device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The limb lengths of 38 patients during deformity correction with a taylor-spatial-frame were measured retrospectively on 7.3 ± 2.6 (4–13) LLR per patient. The measured length of the untreated limb between LLR were used to determine length variability between LLR in each patient. To answer the secondary aim, we took LLR from a 90 cm validation distance. A magnification device was placed in different positions: at the middle of the 90 cm distance (z-position), 5 cm anterior and 5 cm posterior from the z-position, at the bottom and top of the validation distance as well as 5 cm medial and 15 cm lateral from the z-position. RESULTS: The measured length variability ranged within a patient from 10 to 50 mm. 76% of patients had a measured limb length difference of ≥ 2 cm between taken LLR. Compared to length measurement of the 90 cm test object with the magnification device in the z-position (90.1 cm), positioning the device 5 cm anterior led to smaller (88.6 cm) and 5 cm posterior led to larger measurements (91.7 cm). The measured length with the magnification device at the bottom, top, medial or lateral (90.4; 89.9; 90.2; 89.8 cm) to the object differed not relevantly. CONCLUSIONS: High variability of limb length between different LLR within one patient was observed. This can result from different positions of the magnification device in the sagittal plane. These small changes in positioning the device should be avoided to achieve accurate deformity correction and bone lengthening. This should be considered for all length and size measurements on radiographs. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-06 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9217775/ /pubmed/33674962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03831-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Trauma Surgery Ahrend, Marc-Daniel Rühle, Michael Springer, Fabian Baumgartner, Heiko Distance from the magnification device contributes to differences in lower leg length measured in patients with TSF correction |
title | Distance from the magnification device contributes to differences in lower leg length measured in patients with TSF correction |
title_full | Distance from the magnification device contributes to differences in lower leg length measured in patients with TSF correction |
title_fullStr | Distance from the magnification device contributes to differences in lower leg length measured in patients with TSF correction |
title_full_unstemmed | Distance from the magnification device contributes to differences in lower leg length measured in patients with TSF correction |
title_short | Distance from the magnification device contributes to differences in lower leg length measured in patients with TSF correction |
title_sort | distance from the magnification device contributes to differences in lower leg length measured in patients with tsf correction |
topic | Trauma Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9217775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33674962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03831-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahrendmarcdaniel distancefromthemagnificationdevicecontributestodifferencesinlowerleglengthmeasuredinpatientswithtsfcorrection AT ruhlemichael distancefromthemagnificationdevicecontributestodifferencesinlowerleglengthmeasuredinpatientswithtsfcorrection AT springerfabian distancefromthemagnificationdevicecontributestodifferencesinlowerleglengthmeasuredinpatientswithtsfcorrection AT baumgartnerheiko distancefromthemagnificationdevicecontributestodifferencesinlowerleglengthmeasuredinpatientswithtsfcorrection |