Cargando…
Ellipsoid calculations versus manual tumor delineations for glioblastoma tumor volume evaluation
In glioblastoma, the response to treatment assessment is essentially based on the 2D tumor size evolution but remains disputable. Volumetric approaches were evaluated for a more accurate estimation of tumor size. This study included 57 patients and compared two volume measurement methods to determin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9217851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35732848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13739-4 |
_version_ | 1784731749135155200 |
---|---|
author | Le Fèvre, Clara Sun, Roger Cebula, Hélène Thiery, Alicia Antoni, Delphine Schott, Roland Proust, François Constans, Jean-Marc Noël, Georges |
author_facet | Le Fèvre, Clara Sun, Roger Cebula, Hélène Thiery, Alicia Antoni, Delphine Schott, Roland Proust, François Constans, Jean-Marc Noël, Georges |
author_sort | Le Fèvre, Clara |
collection | PubMed |
description | In glioblastoma, the response to treatment assessment is essentially based on the 2D tumor size evolution but remains disputable. Volumetric approaches were evaluated for a more accurate estimation of tumor size. This study included 57 patients and compared two volume measurement methods to determine the size of different glioblastoma regions of interest: the contrast-enhancing area, the necrotic area, the gross target volume and the volume of the edema area. The two methods, the ellipsoid formula (the calculated method) and the manual delineation (the measured method) showed a high correlation to determine glioblastoma volume and a high agreement to classify patients assessment response to treatment according to RANO criteria. This study revealed that calculated and measured methods could be used in clinical practice to estimate glioblastoma volume size and to evaluate tumor size evolution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9217851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92178512022-06-24 Ellipsoid calculations versus manual tumor delineations for glioblastoma tumor volume evaluation Le Fèvre, Clara Sun, Roger Cebula, Hélène Thiery, Alicia Antoni, Delphine Schott, Roland Proust, François Constans, Jean-Marc Noël, Georges Sci Rep Article In glioblastoma, the response to treatment assessment is essentially based on the 2D tumor size evolution but remains disputable. Volumetric approaches were evaluated for a more accurate estimation of tumor size. This study included 57 patients and compared two volume measurement methods to determine the size of different glioblastoma regions of interest: the contrast-enhancing area, the necrotic area, the gross target volume and the volume of the edema area. The two methods, the ellipsoid formula (the calculated method) and the manual delineation (the measured method) showed a high correlation to determine glioblastoma volume and a high agreement to classify patients assessment response to treatment according to RANO criteria. This study revealed that calculated and measured methods could be used in clinical practice to estimate glioblastoma volume size and to evaluate tumor size evolution. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9217851/ /pubmed/35732848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13739-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Le Fèvre, Clara Sun, Roger Cebula, Hélène Thiery, Alicia Antoni, Delphine Schott, Roland Proust, François Constans, Jean-Marc Noël, Georges Ellipsoid calculations versus manual tumor delineations for glioblastoma tumor volume evaluation |
title | Ellipsoid calculations versus manual tumor delineations for glioblastoma tumor volume evaluation |
title_full | Ellipsoid calculations versus manual tumor delineations for glioblastoma tumor volume evaluation |
title_fullStr | Ellipsoid calculations versus manual tumor delineations for glioblastoma tumor volume evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Ellipsoid calculations versus manual tumor delineations for glioblastoma tumor volume evaluation |
title_short | Ellipsoid calculations versus manual tumor delineations for glioblastoma tumor volume evaluation |
title_sort | ellipsoid calculations versus manual tumor delineations for glioblastoma tumor volume evaluation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9217851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35732848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13739-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lefevreclara ellipsoidcalculationsversusmanualtumordelineationsforglioblastomatumorvolumeevaluation AT sunroger ellipsoidcalculationsversusmanualtumordelineationsforglioblastomatumorvolumeevaluation AT cebulahelene ellipsoidcalculationsversusmanualtumordelineationsforglioblastomatumorvolumeevaluation AT thieryalicia ellipsoidcalculationsversusmanualtumordelineationsforglioblastomatumorvolumeevaluation AT antonidelphine ellipsoidcalculationsversusmanualtumordelineationsforglioblastomatumorvolumeevaluation AT schottroland ellipsoidcalculationsversusmanualtumordelineationsforglioblastomatumorvolumeevaluation AT proustfrancois ellipsoidcalculationsversusmanualtumordelineationsforglioblastomatumorvolumeevaluation AT constansjeanmarc ellipsoidcalculationsversusmanualtumordelineationsforglioblastomatumorvolumeevaluation AT noelgeorges ellipsoidcalculationsversusmanualtumordelineationsforglioblastomatumorvolumeevaluation |