Cargando…

Ellipsoid calculations versus manual tumor delineations for glioblastoma tumor volume evaluation

In glioblastoma, the response to treatment assessment is essentially based on the 2D tumor size evolution but remains disputable. Volumetric approaches were evaluated for a more accurate estimation of tumor size. This study included 57 patients and compared two volume measurement methods to determin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le Fèvre, Clara, Sun, Roger, Cebula, Hélène, Thiery, Alicia, Antoni, Delphine, Schott, Roland, Proust, François, Constans, Jean-Marc, Noël, Georges
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9217851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35732848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13739-4
_version_ 1784731749135155200
author Le Fèvre, Clara
Sun, Roger
Cebula, Hélène
Thiery, Alicia
Antoni, Delphine
Schott, Roland
Proust, François
Constans, Jean-Marc
Noël, Georges
author_facet Le Fèvre, Clara
Sun, Roger
Cebula, Hélène
Thiery, Alicia
Antoni, Delphine
Schott, Roland
Proust, François
Constans, Jean-Marc
Noël, Georges
author_sort Le Fèvre, Clara
collection PubMed
description In glioblastoma, the response to treatment assessment is essentially based on the 2D tumor size evolution but remains disputable. Volumetric approaches were evaluated for a more accurate estimation of tumor size. This study included 57 patients and compared two volume measurement methods to determine the size of different glioblastoma regions of interest: the contrast-enhancing area, the necrotic area, the gross target volume and the volume of the edema area. The two methods, the ellipsoid formula (the calculated method) and the manual delineation (the measured method) showed a high correlation to determine glioblastoma volume and a high agreement to classify patients assessment response to treatment according to RANO criteria. This study revealed that calculated and measured methods could be used in clinical practice to estimate glioblastoma volume size and to evaluate tumor size evolution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9217851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92178512022-06-24 Ellipsoid calculations versus manual tumor delineations for glioblastoma tumor volume evaluation Le Fèvre, Clara Sun, Roger Cebula, Hélène Thiery, Alicia Antoni, Delphine Schott, Roland Proust, François Constans, Jean-Marc Noël, Georges Sci Rep Article In glioblastoma, the response to treatment assessment is essentially based on the 2D tumor size evolution but remains disputable. Volumetric approaches were evaluated for a more accurate estimation of tumor size. This study included 57 patients and compared two volume measurement methods to determine the size of different glioblastoma regions of interest: the contrast-enhancing area, the necrotic area, the gross target volume and the volume of the edema area. The two methods, the ellipsoid formula (the calculated method) and the manual delineation (the measured method) showed a high correlation to determine glioblastoma volume and a high agreement to classify patients assessment response to treatment according to RANO criteria. This study revealed that calculated and measured methods could be used in clinical practice to estimate glioblastoma volume size and to evaluate tumor size evolution. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9217851/ /pubmed/35732848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13739-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Le Fèvre, Clara
Sun, Roger
Cebula, Hélène
Thiery, Alicia
Antoni, Delphine
Schott, Roland
Proust, François
Constans, Jean-Marc
Noël, Georges
Ellipsoid calculations versus manual tumor delineations for glioblastoma tumor volume evaluation
title Ellipsoid calculations versus manual tumor delineations for glioblastoma tumor volume evaluation
title_full Ellipsoid calculations versus manual tumor delineations for glioblastoma tumor volume evaluation
title_fullStr Ellipsoid calculations versus manual tumor delineations for glioblastoma tumor volume evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Ellipsoid calculations versus manual tumor delineations for glioblastoma tumor volume evaluation
title_short Ellipsoid calculations versus manual tumor delineations for glioblastoma tumor volume evaluation
title_sort ellipsoid calculations versus manual tumor delineations for glioblastoma tumor volume evaluation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9217851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35732848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13739-4
work_keys_str_mv AT lefevreclara ellipsoidcalculationsversusmanualtumordelineationsforglioblastomatumorvolumeevaluation
AT sunroger ellipsoidcalculationsversusmanualtumordelineationsforglioblastomatumorvolumeevaluation
AT cebulahelene ellipsoidcalculationsversusmanualtumordelineationsforglioblastomatumorvolumeevaluation
AT thieryalicia ellipsoidcalculationsversusmanualtumordelineationsforglioblastomatumorvolumeevaluation
AT antonidelphine ellipsoidcalculationsversusmanualtumordelineationsforglioblastomatumorvolumeevaluation
AT schottroland ellipsoidcalculationsversusmanualtumordelineationsforglioblastomatumorvolumeevaluation
AT proustfrancois ellipsoidcalculationsversusmanualtumordelineationsforglioblastomatumorvolumeevaluation
AT constansjeanmarc ellipsoidcalculationsversusmanualtumordelineationsforglioblastomatumorvolumeevaluation
AT noelgeorges ellipsoidcalculationsversusmanualtumordelineationsforglioblastomatumorvolumeevaluation