Cargando…

Personalizing decision-making for persons with Parkinson’s disease: where do we stand and what to improve?

BACKGROUND: The large variety in symptoms and treatment effects across different persons with Parkinson’s disease (PD) warrants a personalized approach, ensuring that the best decision is made for each individual. We aimed to further clarify this process of personalized decision-making, from the per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Heuvel, Lieneke, Meinders, Marjan J., Post, Bart, Bloem, Bastiaan R., Stiggelbout, Anne M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9217860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35084559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-10969-4
_version_ 1784731751146323968
author van den Heuvel, Lieneke
Meinders, Marjan J.
Post, Bart
Bloem, Bastiaan R.
Stiggelbout, Anne M.
author_facet van den Heuvel, Lieneke
Meinders, Marjan J.
Post, Bart
Bloem, Bastiaan R.
Stiggelbout, Anne M.
author_sort van den Heuvel, Lieneke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The large variety in symptoms and treatment effects across different persons with Parkinson’s disease (PD) warrants a personalized approach, ensuring that the best decision is made for each individual. We aimed to further clarify this process of personalized decision-making, from the perspective of medical professionals. METHODS: We audio-taped 52 consultations with PD patients and their neurologist or PD nurse-specialist, in 6 outpatient clinics. We focused coding of the transcripts on which decisions were made and on if and how decisions were personalized. We subsequently interviewed professionals to elaborate on how and why decisions were personalized, and which decisions would benefit most from a more personalized approach. RESULTS: Most decisions were related to medication, referral or lifestyle. Professionals balanced clinical factors, including individual (disease-) characteristics, and non-clinical factors, including patients’ preference, for each type of decision. These factors were often not explicitly discussed with the patient. Professionals experienced difficulties in personalizing decisions, mostly because evidence on the impact of characteristics of an individual patient on the outcome of the decision is unavailable. Categories of decisions for which professionals emphasized the importance of a more personalized perspective include choices not only for medication and advanced treatments, but also for referrals, lifestyle and diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical decision-making is a complex process, influenced by many different factors that differ for each decision and for each individual. In daily practice, it proves difficult to tailor decisions to individual (disease-) characteristics, probably because sufficient evidence on the impact of these individual characteristics on outcomes is lacking.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9217860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92178602022-06-24 Personalizing decision-making for persons with Parkinson’s disease: where do we stand and what to improve? van den Heuvel, Lieneke Meinders, Marjan J. Post, Bart Bloem, Bastiaan R. Stiggelbout, Anne M. J Neurol Original Communication BACKGROUND: The large variety in symptoms and treatment effects across different persons with Parkinson’s disease (PD) warrants a personalized approach, ensuring that the best decision is made for each individual. We aimed to further clarify this process of personalized decision-making, from the perspective of medical professionals. METHODS: We audio-taped 52 consultations with PD patients and their neurologist or PD nurse-specialist, in 6 outpatient clinics. We focused coding of the transcripts on which decisions were made and on if and how decisions were personalized. We subsequently interviewed professionals to elaborate on how and why decisions were personalized, and which decisions would benefit most from a more personalized approach. RESULTS: Most decisions were related to medication, referral or lifestyle. Professionals balanced clinical factors, including individual (disease-) characteristics, and non-clinical factors, including patients’ preference, for each type of decision. These factors were often not explicitly discussed with the patient. Professionals experienced difficulties in personalizing decisions, mostly because evidence on the impact of characteristics of an individual patient on the outcome of the decision is unavailable. Categories of decisions for which professionals emphasized the importance of a more personalized perspective include choices not only for medication and advanced treatments, but also for referrals, lifestyle and diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical decision-making is a complex process, influenced by many different factors that differ for each decision and for each individual. In daily practice, it proves difficult to tailor decisions to individual (disease-) characteristics, probably because sufficient evidence on the impact of these individual characteristics on outcomes is lacking. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-01-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9217860/ /pubmed/35084559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-10969-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Communication
van den Heuvel, Lieneke
Meinders, Marjan J.
Post, Bart
Bloem, Bastiaan R.
Stiggelbout, Anne M.
Personalizing decision-making for persons with Parkinson’s disease: where do we stand and what to improve?
title Personalizing decision-making for persons with Parkinson’s disease: where do we stand and what to improve?
title_full Personalizing decision-making for persons with Parkinson’s disease: where do we stand and what to improve?
title_fullStr Personalizing decision-making for persons with Parkinson’s disease: where do we stand and what to improve?
title_full_unstemmed Personalizing decision-making for persons with Parkinson’s disease: where do we stand and what to improve?
title_short Personalizing decision-making for persons with Parkinson’s disease: where do we stand and what to improve?
title_sort personalizing decision-making for persons with parkinson’s disease: where do we stand and what to improve?
topic Original Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9217860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35084559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-10969-4
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenheuvellieneke personalizingdecisionmakingforpersonswithparkinsonsdiseasewheredowestandandwhattoimprove
AT meindersmarjanj personalizingdecisionmakingforpersonswithparkinsonsdiseasewheredowestandandwhattoimprove
AT postbart personalizingdecisionmakingforpersonswithparkinsonsdiseasewheredowestandandwhattoimprove
AT bloembastiaanr personalizingdecisionmakingforpersonswithparkinsonsdiseasewheredowestandandwhattoimprove
AT stiggelboutannem personalizingdecisionmakingforpersonswithparkinsonsdiseasewheredowestandandwhattoimprove