Cargando…

Primary stability of single-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in case of failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization depends on implant position during ACL repair

INTRODUCTION: The object of this study was to evaluate the primary stability of tibial interference screw (IFS) fixation in single-stage revision surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in the case of recurrent instability after ACL repair with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS), d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glasbrenner, J., Fischer, M., Raschke, M. J., Briese, T., Müller, M., Herbst, E., Kittl, C., Schliemann, B., Kösters, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9217861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34331580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04088-4
_version_ 1784731751399030784
author Glasbrenner, J.
Fischer, M.
Raschke, M. J.
Briese, T.
Müller, M.
Herbst, E.
Kittl, C.
Schliemann, B.
Kösters, C.
author_facet Glasbrenner, J.
Fischer, M.
Raschke, M. J.
Briese, T.
Müller, M.
Herbst, E.
Kittl, C.
Schliemann, B.
Kösters, C.
author_sort Glasbrenner, J.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The object of this study was to evaluate the primary stability of tibial interference screw (IFS) fixation in single-stage revision surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in the case of recurrent instability after ACL repair with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS), dependent on the implant position during DIS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tibial aperture fixation in ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) was performed in a porcine knee model using an IFS. Native ACL-R was performed in the control group (n = 15). In the intervention groups DIS and subsequent implant removal were performed prior to single-stage revision ACL-R. A distance of 20 mm in group R-DIS1 (n = 15) and 5 mm in group R-DIS2 (n = 15) was left between the joint line and the implant during DIS. Specimens were mounted in a material-testing machine and load-to-failure was applied in a worst-case-scenario. RESULTS: Load to failure was 454 ± 111 N in the R-DIS1 group, 154 ± 71 N in the R-DIS2 group and 405 ± 105 N in the primary ACL-R group. Load-to-failure, stiffness and elongation of the group R-DIS2 were significantly inferior in comparison to R-DIS1 and ACL-R respectively (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between load-to-failure, stiffness and elongation of R-DIS1 and the control group. CONCLUSION: Primary stability of tibial aperture fixation in single-stage revision ACL-R in case of recurrent instability after DIS depends on monobloc position during ACL repair. Primary stability is comparable to aperture fixation in primary ACL-R, if a bone stock of 20 mm is left between the monobloc and the tibial joint line during the initial procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9217861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92178612022-06-24 Primary stability of single-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in case of failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization depends on implant position during ACL repair Glasbrenner, J. Fischer, M. Raschke, M. J. Briese, T. Müller, M. Herbst, E. Kittl, C. Schliemann, B. Kösters, C. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine INTRODUCTION: The object of this study was to evaluate the primary stability of tibial interference screw (IFS) fixation in single-stage revision surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in the case of recurrent instability after ACL repair with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS), dependent on the implant position during DIS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tibial aperture fixation in ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) was performed in a porcine knee model using an IFS. Native ACL-R was performed in the control group (n = 15). In the intervention groups DIS and subsequent implant removal were performed prior to single-stage revision ACL-R. A distance of 20 mm in group R-DIS1 (n = 15) and 5 mm in group R-DIS2 (n = 15) was left between the joint line and the implant during DIS. Specimens were mounted in a material-testing machine and load-to-failure was applied in a worst-case-scenario. RESULTS: Load to failure was 454 ± 111 N in the R-DIS1 group, 154 ± 71 N in the R-DIS2 group and 405 ± 105 N in the primary ACL-R group. Load-to-failure, stiffness and elongation of the group R-DIS2 were significantly inferior in comparison to R-DIS1 and ACL-R respectively (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between load-to-failure, stiffness and elongation of R-DIS1 and the control group. CONCLUSION: Primary stability of tibial aperture fixation in single-stage revision ACL-R in case of recurrent instability after DIS depends on monobloc position during ACL repair. Primary stability is comparable to aperture fixation in primary ACL-R, if a bone stock of 20 mm is left between the monobloc and the tibial joint line during the initial procedure. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-07-31 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9217861/ /pubmed/34331580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04088-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
Glasbrenner, J.
Fischer, M.
Raschke, M. J.
Briese, T.
Müller, M.
Herbst, E.
Kittl, C.
Schliemann, B.
Kösters, C.
Primary stability of single-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in case of failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization depends on implant position during ACL repair
title Primary stability of single-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in case of failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization depends on implant position during ACL repair
title_full Primary stability of single-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in case of failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization depends on implant position during ACL repair
title_fullStr Primary stability of single-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in case of failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization depends on implant position during ACL repair
title_full_unstemmed Primary stability of single-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in case of failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization depends on implant position during ACL repair
title_short Primary stability of single-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in case of failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization depends on implant position during ACL repair
title_sort primary stability of single-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in case of failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization depends on implant position during acl repair
topic Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9217861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34331580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04088-4
work_keys_str_mv AT glasbrennerj primarystabilityofsinglestagerevisionreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentincaseoffailureofdynamicintraligamentarystabilizationdependsonimplantpositionduringaclrepair
AT fischerm primarystabilityofsinglestagerevisionreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentincaseoffailureofdynamicintraligamentarystabilizationdependsonimplantpositionduringaclrepair
AT raschkemj primarystabilityofsinglestagerevisionreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentincaseoffailureofdynamicintraligamentarystabilizationdependsonimplantpositionduringaclrepair
AT brieset primarystabilityofsinglestagerevisionreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentincaseoffailureofdynamicintraligamentarystabilizationdependsonimplantpositionduringaclrepair
AT mullerm primarystabilityofsinglestagerevisionreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentincaseoffailureofdynamicintraligamentarystabilizationdependsonimplantpositionduringaclrepair
AT herbste primarystabilityofsinglestagerevisionreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentincaseoffailureofdynamicintraligamentarystabilizationdependsonimplantpositionduringaclrepair
AT kittlc primarystabilityofsinglestagerevisionreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentincaseoffailureofdynamicintraligamentarystabilizationdependsonimplantpositionduringaclrepair
AT schliemannb primarystabilityofsinglestagerevisionreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentincaseoffailureofdynamicintraligamentarystabilizationdependsonimplantpositionduringaclrepair
AT kostersc primarystabilityofsinglestagerevisionreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentincaseoffailureofdynamicintraligamentarystabilizationdependsonimplantpositionduringaclrepair