Cargando…
Primary stability of single-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in case of failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization depends on implant position during ACL repair
INTRODUCTION: The object of this study was to evaluate the primary stability of tibial interference screw (IFS) fixation in single-stage revision surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in the case of recurrent instability after ACL repair with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS), d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9217861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34331580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04088-4 |
_version_ | 1784731751399030784 |
---|---|
author | Glasbrenner, J. Fischer, M. Raschke, M. J. Briese, T. Müller, M. Herbst, E. Kittl, C. Schliemann, B. Kösters, C. |
author_facet | Glasbrenner, J. Fischer, M. Raschke, M. J. Briese, T. Müller, M. Herbst, E. Kittl, C. Schliemann, B. Kösters, C. |
author_sort | Glasbrenner, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The object of this study was to evaluate the primary stability of tibial interference screw (IFS) fixation in single-stage revision surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in the case of recurrent instability after ACL repair with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS), dependent on the implant position during DIS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tibial aperture fixation in ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) was performed in a porcine knee model using an IFS. Native ACL-R was performed in the control group (n = 15). In the intervention groups DIS and subsequent implant removal were performed prior to single-stage revision ACL-R. A distance of 20 mm in group R-DIS1 (n = 15) and 5 mm in group R-DIS2 (n = 15) was left between the joint line and the implant during DIS. Specimens were mounted in a material-testing machine and load-to-failure was applied in a worst-case-scenario. RESULTS: Load to failure was 454 ± 111 N in the R-DIS1 group, 154 ± 71 N in the R-DIS2 group and 405 ± 105 N in the primary ACL-R group. Load-to-failure, stiffness and elongation of the group R-DIS2 were significantly inferior in comparison to R-DIS1 and ACL-R respectively (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between load-to-failure, stiffness and elongation of R-DIS1 and the control group. CONCLUSION: Primary stability of tibial aperture fixation in single-stage revision ACL-R in case of recurrent instability after DIS depends on monobloc position during ACL repair. Primary stability is comparable to aperture fixation in primary ACL-R, if a bone stock of 20 mm is left between the monobloc and the tibial joint line during the initial procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9217861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92178612022-06-24 Primary stability of single-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in case of failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization depends on implant position during ACL repair Glasbrenner, J. Fischer, M. Raschke, M. J. Briese, T. Müller, M. Herbst, E. Kittl, C. Schliemann, B. Kösters, C. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine INTRODUCTION: The object of this study was to evaluate the primary stability of tibial interference screw (IFS) fixation in single-stage revision surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in the case of recurrent instability after ACL repair with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS), dependent on the implant position during DIS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tibial aperture fixation in ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) was performed in a porcine knee model using an IFS. Native ACL-R was performed in the control group (n = 15). In the intervention groups DIS and subsequent implant removal were performed prior to single-stage revision ACL-R. A distance of 20 mm in group R-DIS1 (n = 15) and 5 mm in group R-DIS2 (n = 15) was left between the joint line and the implant during DIS. Specimens were mounted in a material-testing machine and load-to-failure was applied in a worst-case-scenario. RESULTS: Load to failure was 454 ± 111 N in the R-DIS1 group, 154 ± 71 N in the R-DIS2 group and 405 ± 105 N in the primary ACL-R group. Load-to-failure, stiffness and elongation of the group R-DIS2 were significantly inferior in comparison to R-DIS1 and ACL-R respectively (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between load-to-failure, stiffness and elongation of R-DIS1 and the control group. CONCLUSION: Primary stability of tibial aperture fixation in single-stage revision ACL-R in case of recurrent instability after DIS depends on monobloc position during ACL repair. Primary stability is comparable to aperture fixation in primary ACL-R, if a bone stock of 20 mm is left between the monobloc and the tibial joint line during the initial procedure. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-07-31 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9217861/ /pubmed/34331580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04088-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Glasbrenner, J. Fischer, M. Raschke, M. J. Briese, T. Müller, M. Herbst, E. Kittl, C. Schliemann, B. Kösters, C. Primary stability of single-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in case of failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization depends on implant position during ACL repair |
title | Primary stability of single-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in case of failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization depends on implant position during ACL repair |
title_full | Primary stability of single-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in case of failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization depends on implant position during ACL repair |
title_fullStr | Primary stability of single-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in case of failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization depends on implant position during ACL repair |
title_full_unstemmed | Primary stability of single-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in case of failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization depends on implant position during ACL repair |
title_short | Primary stability of single-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in case of failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization depends on implant position during ACL repair |
title_sort | primary stability of single-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in case of failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization depends on implant position during acl repair |
topic | Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9217861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34331580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04088-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT glasbrennerj primarystabilityofsinglestagerevisionreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentincaseoffailureofdynamicintraligamentarystabilizationdependsonimplantpositionduringaclrepair AT fischerm primarystabilityofsinglestagerevisionreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentincaseoffailureofdynamicintraligamentarystabilizationdependsonimplantpositionduringaclrepair AT raschkemj primarystabilityofsinglestagerevisionreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentincaseoffailureofdynamicintraligamentarystabilizationdependsonimplantpositionduringaclrepair AT brieset primarystabilityofsinglestagerevisionreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentincaseoffailureofdynamicintraligamentarystabilizationdependsonimplantpositionduringaclrepair AT mullerm primarystabilityofsinglestagerevisionreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentincaseoffailureofdynamicintraligamentarystabilizationdependsonimplantpositionduringaclrepair AT herbste primarystabilityofsinglestagerevisionreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentincaseoffailureofdynamicintraligamentarystabilizationdependsonimplantpositionduringaclrepair AT kittlc primarystabilityofsinglestagerevisionreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentincaseoffailureofdynamicintraligamentarystabilizationdependsonimplantpositionduringaclrepair AT schliemannb primarystabilityofsinglestagerevisionreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentincaseoffailureofdynamicintraligamentarystabilizationdependsonimplantpositionduringaclrepair AT kostersc primarystabilityofsinglestagerevisionreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentincaseoffailureofdynamicintraligamentarystabilizationdependsonimplantpositionduringaclrepair |