Cargando…

The Impact of the Priority Review Voucher on Research and Development for Tropical Diseases

BACKGROUND: In 2007, the priority review voucher (PRV) was implemented in the US to incentivize research and development (R&D) for tropical diseases. The PRV is issued by the US FDA and grants a quicker review to manufacturers upon successful development of a product for a disease eligible for t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aerts, Celine, Barrenho, Eliana, Miraldo, Marisa, Sicuri, Elisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9217899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35588350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40290-022-00427-x
_version_ 1784731760275226624
author Aerts, Celine
Barrenho, Eliana
Miraldo, Marisa
Sicuri, Elisa
author_facet Aerts, Celine
Barrenho, Eliana
Miraldo, Marisa
Sicuri, Elisa
author_sort Aerts, Celine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2007, the priority review voucher (PRV) was implemented in the US to incentivize research and development (R&D) for tropical diseases. The PRV is issued by the US FDA and grants a quicker review to manufacturers upon successful development of a product for a disease eligible for the program. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to assess whether the PRV has incentivized R&D (measured as clinical trial activity) for the intended tropical diseases. METHOD: We used a difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) strategy by exploiting variation in its implementation across diseases and registries around the world. Clinical trials were retrieved from the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for the years 2005–2019. RESULTS: We found a positive, but not statistically significant, effect of the PRV on stimulating R&D activity. Delayed effects of the policy could not be found. CONCLUSION: Our findings, which were robust across a series of robustness tests, suggest that the PRV program is not associated with a trigger in innovation for neglected diseases and therefore should not be considered as a stand-alone solution. It should be supplemented with other government measures to incentivize R&D activity. To increase the value of the program, we recommend that the PRV only be awarded to novel products and not to products that have already been licensed outside the US. Doing so would restrict the number of vouchers awarded and slow down their ongoing market depreciation. Finally, we propose that product sponsors be required to submit an access plan for PRV-awarded products. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40290-022-00427-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9217899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92178992022-06-24 The Impact of the Priority Review Voucher on Research and Development for Tropical Diseases Aerts, Celine Barrenho, Eliana Miraldo, Marisa Sicuri, Elisa Pharmaceut Med Original Research Article BACKGROUND: In 2007, the priority review voucher (PRV) was implemented in the US to incentivize research and development (R&D) for tropical diseases. The PRV is issued by the US FDA and grants a quicker review to manufacturers upon successful development of a product for a disease eligible for the program. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to assess whether the PRV has incentivized R&D (measured as clinical trial activity) for the intended tropical diseases. METHOD: We used a difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) strategy by exploiting variation in its implementation across diseases and registries around the world. Clinical trials were retrieved from the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for the years 2005–2019. RESULTS: We found a positive, but not statistically significant, effect of the PRV on stimulating R&D activity. Delayed effects of the policy could not be found. CONCLUSION: Our findings, which were robust across a series of robustness tests, suggest that the PRV program is not associated with a trigger in innovation for neglected diseases and therefore should not be considered as a stand-alone solution. It should be supplemented with other government measures to incentivize R&D activity. To increase the value of the program, we recommend that the PRV only be awarded to novel products and not to products that have already been licensed outside the US. Doing so would restrict the number of vouchers awarded and slow down their ongoing market depreciation. Finally, we propose that product sponsors be required to submit an access plan for PRV-awarded products. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40290-022-00427-x. Springer International Publishing 2022-05-19 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9217899/ /pubmed/35588350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40290-022-00427-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Aerts, Celine
Barrenho, Eliana
Miraldo, Marisa
Sicuri, Elisa
The Impact of the Priority Review Voucher on Research and Development for Tropical Diseases
title The Impact of the Priority Review Voucher on Research and Development for Tropical Diseases
title_full The Impact of the Priority Review Voucher on Research and Development for Tropical Diseases
title_fullStr The Impact of the Priority Review Voucher on Research and Development for Tropical Diseases
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of the Priority Review Voucher on Research and Development for Tropical Diseases
title_short The Impact of the Priority Review Voucher on Research and Development for Tropical Diseases
title_sort impact of the priority review voucher on research and development for tropical diseases
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9217899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35588350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40290-022-00427-x
work_keys_str_mv AT aertsceline theimpactofthepriorityreviewvoucheronresearchanddevelopmentfortropicaldiseases
AT barrenhoeliana theimpactofthepriorityreviewvoucheronresearchanddevelopmentfortropicaldiseases
AT miraldomarisa theimpactofthepriorityreviewvoucheronresearchanddevelopmentfortropicaldiseases
AT sicurielisa theimpactofthepriorityreviewvoucheronresearchanddevelopmentfortropicaldiseases
AT aertsceline impactofthepriorityreviewvoucheronresearchanddevelopmentfortropicaldiseases
AT barrenhoeliana impactofthepriorityreviewvoucheronresearchanddevelopmentfortropicaldiseases
AT miraldomarisa impactofthepriorityreviewvoucheronresearchanddevelopmentfortropicaldiseases
AT sicurielisa impactofthepriorityreviewvoucheronresearchanddevelopmentfortropicaldiseases