Cargando…

Machine learning methods to predict attrition in a population-based cohort of very preterm infants

The timely identification of cohort participants at higher risk for attrition is important to earlier interventions and efficient use of research resources. Machine learning may have advantages over the conventional approaches to improve discrimination by analysing complex interactions among predict...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teixeira, Raquel, Rodrigues, Carina, Moreira, Carla, Barros, Henrique, Camacho, Rui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9217966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35732850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13946-z
_version_ 1784731776343605248
author Teixeira, Raquel
Rodrigues, Carina
Moreira, Carla
Barros, Henrique
Camacho, Rui
author_facet Teixeira, Raquel
Rodrigues, Carina
Moreira, Carla
Barros, Henrique
Camacho, Rui
author_sort Teixeira, Raquel
collection PubMed
description The timely identification of cohort participants at higher risk for attrition is important to earlier interventions and efficient use of research resources. Machine learning may have advantages over the conventional approaches to improve discrimination by analysing complex interactions among predictors. We developed predictive models of attrition applying a conventional regression model and different machine learning methods. A total of 542 very preterm (< 32 gestational weeks) infants born in Portugal as part of the European Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe (EPICE) cohort were included. We tested a model with a fixed number of predictors (Baseline) and a second with a dynamic number of variables added from each follow-up (Incremental). Eight classification methods were applied: AdaBoost, Artificial Neural Networks, Functional Trees, J48, J48Consolidated, K-Nearest Neighbours, Random Forest and Logistic Regression. Performance was compared using AUC- PR (Area Under the Curve—Precision Recall), Accuracy, Sensitivity and F-measure. Attrition at the four follow-ups were, respectively: 16%, 25%, 13% and 17%. Both models demonstrated good predictive performance, AUC-PR ranging between 69 and 94.1 in Baseline and from 72.5 to 97.1 in Incremental model. Of the whole set of methods, Random Forest presented the best performance at all follow-ups [AUC-PR(1): 94.1 (2.0); AUC-PR(2): 91.2 (1.2); AUC-PR(3): 97.1 (1.0); AUC-PR(4): 96.5 (1.7)]. Logistic Regression performed well below Random Forest. The top-ranked predictors were common for both models in all follow-ups: birthweight, gestational age, maternal age, and length of hospital stay. Random Forest presented the highest capacity for prediction and provided interpretable predictors. Researchers involved in cohorts can benefit from our robust models to prepare for and prevent loss to follow-up by directing efforts toward individuals at higher risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9217966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92179662022-06-24 Machine learning methods to predict attrition in a population-based cohort of very preterm infants Teixeira, Raquel Rodrigues, Carina Moreira, Carla Barros, Henrique Camacho, Rui Sci Rep Article The timely identification of cohort participants at higher risk for attrition is important to earlier interventions and efficient use of research resources. Machine learning may have advantages over the conventional approaches to improve discrimination by analysing complex interactions among predictors. We developed predictive models of attrition applying a conventional regression model and different machine learning methods. A total of 542 very preterm (< 32 gestational weeks) infants born in Portugal as part of the European Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe (EPICE) cohort were included. We tested a model with a fixed number of predictors (Baseline) and a second with a dynamic number of variables added from each follow-up (Incremental). Eight classification methods were applied: AdaBoost, Artificial Neural Networks, Functional Trees, J48, J48Consolidated, K-Nearest Neighbours, Random Forest and Logistic Regression. Performance was compared using AUC- PR (Area Under the Curve—Precision Recall), Accuracy, Sensitivity and F-measure. Attrition at the four follow-ups were, respectively: 16%, 25%, 13% and 17%. Both models demonstrated good predictive performance, AUC-PR ranging between 69 and 94.1 in Baseline and from 72.5 to 97.1 in Incremental model. Of the whole set of methods, Random Forest presented the best performance at all follow-ups [AUC-PR(1): 94.1 (2.0); AUC-PR(2): 91.2 (1.2); AUC-PR(3): 97.1 (1.0); AUC-PR(4): 96.5 (1.7)]. Logistic Regression performed well below Random Forest. The top-ranked predictors were common for both models in all follow-ups: birthweight, gestational age, maternal age, and length of hospital stay. Random Forest presented the highest capacity for prediction and provided interpretable predictors. Researchers involved in cohorts can benefit from our robust models to prepare for and prevent loss to follow-up by directing efforts toward individuals at higher risk. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9217966/ /pubmed/35732850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13946-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Teixeira, Raquel
Rodrigues, Carina
Moreira, Carla
Barros, Henrique
Camacho, Rui
Machine learning methods to predict attrition in a population-based cohort of very preterm infants
title Machine learning methods to predict attrition in a population-based cohort of very preterm infants
title_full Machine learning methods to predict attrition in a population-based cohort of very preterm infants
title_fullStr Machine learning methods to predict attrition in a population-based cohort of very preterm infants
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning methods to predict attrition in a population-based cohort of very preterm infants
title_short Machine learning methods to predict attrition in a population-based cohort of very preterm infants
title_sort machine learning methods to predict attrition in a population-based cohort of very preterm infants
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9217966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35732850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13946-z
work_keys_str_mv AT teixeiraraquel machinelearningmethodstopredictattritioninapopulationbasedcohortofverypreterminfants
AT rodriguescarina machinelearningmethodstopredictattritioninapopulationbasedcohortofverypreterminfants
AT moreiracarla machinelearningmethodstopredictattritioninapopulationbasedcohortofverypreterminfants
AT barroshenrique machinelearningmethodstopredictattritioninapopulationbasedcohortofverypreterminfants
AT camachorui machinelearningmethodstopredictattritioninapopulationbasedcohortofverypreterminfants