Cargando…
Efficacy and Tolerability of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation in the Treatment of Anxiety: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) for patients with anxiety symptoms. METHOD: We searched the Pubmed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase and Medline for randomized control trials (RCTs) from the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9218324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35757229 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.899040 |
_version_ | 1784731861238415360 |
---|---|
author | Ching, Pao-Yuan Hsu, Tien-Wei Chen, Guan-Wei Pan, Chih-Chuan Chu, Che-Sheng Chou, Po-Han |
author_facet | Ching, Pao-Yuan Hsu, Tien-Wei Chen, Guan-Wei Pan, Chih-Chuan Chu, Che-Sheng Chou, Po-Han |
author_sort | Ching, Pao-Yuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) for patients with anxiety symptoms. METHOD: We searched the Pubmed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase and Medline for randomized control trials (RCTs) from the time of inception until November 15, 2021, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. The primary outcomes were the mean change scores for anxiety symptoms. The secondary outcomes were the mean change scores for depressive symptoms. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs were eligible (n = 794, mean age: 41.4, mean population of female: 64.8%). CES significantly reduced the anxiety symptoms compared to the control group [k = 11, n = 692, Hedge's g = −0.625, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = −0.952 to −0.298, P < 0.001] with moderate effect size. The subgroup analysis showed that CES reduced both primary and secondary anxiety (primary anxiety, k =3, n = 288, Hedges' g = −1.218, 95% CIs = −1.418 to −0.968, P = 0.007; secondary anxiety, k = 8, n = 504, Hedges' g = −0.334, 95% CIs = −0.570 to −0.098, P = 0.006). After performing between group analysis, we found CES has significant better efficacy for patients with primary anxiety than those with secondary anxiety (P < 0.001). For secondary outcome, CES significantly reduced depressive symptoms in patients with anxiety disorders (k = 8, n = 552, Hedges' g = −0.648, 95% CIs = −1.062 to −0.234, P = 0.002). No severe side effects were reported and the most commonly reported adverse events were ear discomfort and ear pain. CONCLUSION: We found CES is effective in reducing anxiety symptoms with moderate effect size in patients with both primary and secondary anxiety. Furthermore, CES was well-tolerated and acceptable. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021267916. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9218324 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92183242022-06-24 Efficacy and Tolerability of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation in the Treatment of Anxiety: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis Ching, Pao-Yuan Hsu, Tien-Wei Chen, Guan-Wei Pan, Chih-Chuan Chu, Che-Sheng Chou, Po-Han Front Psychiatry Psychiatry OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) for patients with anxiety symptoms. METHOD: We searched the Pubmed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase and Medline for randomized control trials (RCTs) from the time of inception until November 15, 2021, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. The primary outcomes were the mean change scores for anxiety symptoms. The secondary outcomes were the mean change scores for depressive symptoms. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs were eligible (n = 794, mean age: 41.4, mean population of female: 64.8%). CES significantly reduced the anxiety symptoms compared to the control group [k = 11, n = 692, Hedge's g = −0.625, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = −0.952 to −0.298, P < 0.001] with moderate effect size. The subgroup analysis showed that CES reduced both primary and secondary anxiety (primary anxiety, k =3, n = 288, Hedges' g = −1.218, 95% CIs = −1.418 to −0.968, P = 0.007; secondary anxiety, k = 8, n = 504, Hedges' g = −0.334, 95% CIs = −0.570 to −0.098, P = 0.006). After performing between group analysis, we found CES has significant better efficacy for patients with primary anxiety than those with secondary anxiety (P < 0.001). For secondary outcome, CES significantly reduced depressive symptoms in patients with anxiety disorders (k = 8, n = 552, Hedges' g = −0.648, 95% CIs = −1.062 to −0.234, P = 0.002). No severe side effects were reported and the most commonly reported adverse events were ear discomfort and ear pain. CONCLUSION: We found CES is effective in reducing anxiety symptoms with moderate effect size in patients with both primary and secondary anxiety. Furthermore, CES was well-tolerated and acceptable. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021267916. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9218324/ /pubmed/35757229 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.899040 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ching, Hsu, Chen, Pan, Chu and Chou. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Ching, Pao-Yuan Hsu, Tien-Wei Chen, Guan-Wei Pan, Chih-Chuan Chu, Che-Sheng Chou, Po-Han Efficacy and Tolerability of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation in the Treatment of Anxiety: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Efficacy and Tolerability of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation in the Treatment of Anxiety: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and Tolerability of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation in the Treatment of Anxiety: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Tolerability of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation in the Treatment of Anxiety: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Tolerability of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation in the Treatment of Anxiety: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and Tolerability of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation in the Treatment of Anxiety: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and tolerability of cranial electrotherapy stimulation in the treatment of anxiety: a systemic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9218324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35757229 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.899040 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chingpaoyuan efficacyandtolerabilityofcranialelectrotherapystimulationinthetreatmentofanxietyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hsutienwei efficacyandtolerabilityofcranialelectrotherapystimulationinthetreatmentofanxietyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenguanwei efficacyandtolerabilityofcranialelectrotherapystimulationinthetreatmentofanxietyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT panchihchuan efficacyandtolerabilityofcranialelectrotherapystimulationinthetreatmentofanxietyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chuchesheng efficacyandtolerabilityofcranialelectrotherapystimulationinthetreatmentofanxietyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT choupohan efficacyandtolerabilityofcranialelectrotherapystimulationinthetreatmentofanxietyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis |