Cargando…
Deep Learning for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance: Predicting Gamma Passing Rates for IMRT Based on Delivery Fluence Informed by log Files
Objectives: In this study, we propose a deep learning-based approach to predict Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) gamma passing rates using delivery fluence informed by log files. Methods: A total of 112 IMRT plans for chest cancers were planned and measured by port...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9218492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35726209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338221104881 |
_version_ | 1784731903071354880 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Ying Pi, Yifei Ma, Kui Miao, Xiaojuan Fu, Sichao Zhu, Zhen Cheng, Yifan Zhang, Zhepei Chen, Hua Wang, Hao Gu, Hengle Shao, Yan Duan, Yanhua Feng, Aihui Zhuo, Weihai Xu, Zhiyong |
author_facet | Huang, Ying Pi, Yifei Ma, Kui Miao, Xiaojuan Fu, Sichao Zhu, Zhen Cheng, Yifan Zhang, Zhepei Chen, Hua Wang, Hao Gu, Hengle Shao, Yan Duan, Yanhua Feng, Aihui Zhuo, Weihai Xu, Zhiyong |
author_sort | Huang, Ying |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives: In this study, we propose a deep learning-based approach to predict Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) gamma passing rates using delivery fluence informed by log files. Methods: A total of 112 IMRT plans for chest cancers were planned and measured by portal dosimetry equipped on TrueBeam linac. The convolutional neural network (CNN) based learning model was trained using delivery fluence as inputs and gamma passing rates (GPRs) of 4 different criteria (3%/3 mm, 2%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 2%/2 mm) as outputs. Model performance for both validation and test sets was assessed using mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root MSE (RMSE), Spearman rank correlation coefficients (Sr), and Determination coefficient (R(2)) between the measured and predicted GPR values. Results: In the test set, the MAE of the prediction model were 0.402, 0.511, 1.724, and 2.530, the MSE were 0.640, 0.986, 6.654, and 9.508, the RMSE were 0.800, 0.993, 2.580, and 3.083, the Sr were 0.643, 0.684, 0.821, and 0.824 (P < .001) and the R(2) were 0.4110, 0.4666, 0.6677, and 0.6769 for 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, 2%/3 mm, and 2%/2 mm, respectively. The MAE and RMSE of the prediction model decreased with stricter gamma criteria while the Sr and R(2) between measured and predicted GPR values increased. Conclusions: The CNN prediction model based on delivery fluence informed by log files could accurately predict IMRT QA passing rates for different gamma criteria. It could reduce QA workload and improve efficiency in pretreatment QA. Our results suggest that the CNN prediction model based on delivery fluence informed by log files may be a promising tool for the gamma evaluation of IMRT QA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9218492 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92184922022-06-24 Deep Learning for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance: Predicting Gamma Passing Rates for IMRT Based on Delivery Fluence Informed by log Files Huang, Ying Pi, Yifei Ma, Kui Miao, Xiaojuan Fu, Sichao Zhu, Zhen Cheng, Yifan Zhang, Zhepei Chen, Hua Wang, Hao Gu, Hengle Shao, Yan Duan, Yanhua Feng, Aihui Zhuo, Weihai Xu, Zhiyong Technol Cancer Res Treat Novel Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Research Objectives: In this study, we propose a deep learning-based approach to predict Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) gamma passing rates using delivery fluence informed by log files. Methods: A total of 112 IMRT plans for chest cancers were planned and measured by portal dosimetry equipped on TrueBeam linac. The convolutional neural network (CNN) based learning model was trained using delivery fluence as inputs and gamma passing rates (GPRs) of 4 different criteria (3%/3 mm, 2%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 2%/2 mm) as outputs. Model performance for both validation and test sets was assessed using mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root MSE (RMSE), Spearman rank correlation coefficients (Sr), and Determination coefficient (R(2)) between the measured and predicted GPR values. Results: In the test set, the MAE of the prediction model were 0.402, 0.511, 1.724, and 2.530, the MSE were 0.640, 0.986, 6.654, and 9.508, the RMSE were 0.800, 0.993, 2.580, and 3.083, the Sr were 0.643, 0.684, 0.821, and 0.824 (P < .001) and the R(2) were 0.4110, 0.4666, 0.6677, and 0.6769 for 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, 2%/3 mm, and 2%/2 mm, respectively. The MAE and RMSE of the prediction model decreased with stricter gamma criteria while the Sr and R(2) between measured and predicted GPR values increased. Conclusions: The CNN prediction model based on delivery fluence informed by log files could accurately predict IMRT QA passing rates for different gamma criteria. It could reduce QA workload and improve efficiency in pretreatment QA. Our results suggest that the CNN prediction model based on delivery fluence informed by log files may be a promising tool for the gamma evaluation of IMRT QA. SAGE Publications 2022-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9218492/ /pubmed/35726209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338221104881 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Novel Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Research Huang, Ying Pi, Yifei Ma, Kui Miao, Xiaojuan Fu, Sichao Zhu, Zhen Cheng, Yifan Zhang, Zhepei Chen, Hua Wang, Hao Gu, Hengle Shao, Yan Duan, Yanhua Feng, Aihui Zhuo, Weihai Xu, Zhiyong Deep Learning for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance: Predicting Gamma Passing Rates for IMRT Based on Delivery Fluence Informed by log Files |
title | Deep Learning for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance: Predicting Gamma Passing Rates for IMRT Based on Delivery Fluence Informed by log Files |
title_full | Deep Learning for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance: Predicting Gamma Passing Rates for IMRT Based on Delivery Fluence Informed by log Files |
title_fullStr | Deep Learning for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance: Predicting Gamma Passing Rates for IMRT Based on Delivery Fluence Informed by log Files |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep Learning for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance: Predicting Gamma Passing Rates for IMRT Based on Delivery Fluence Informed by log Files |
title_short | Deep Learning for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance: Predicting Gamma Passing Rates for IMRT Based on Delivery Fluence Informed by log Files |
title_sort | deep learning for patient-specific quality assurance: predicting gamma passing rates for imrt based on delivery fluence informed by log files |
topic | Novel Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9218492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35726209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338221104881 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangying deeplearningforpatientspecificqualityassurancepredictinggammapassingratesforimrtbasedondeliveryfluenceinformedbylogfiles AT piyifei deeplearningforpatientspecificqualityassurancepredictinggammapassingratesforimrtbasedondeliveryfluenceinformedbylogfiles AT makui deeplearningforpatientspecificqualityassurancepredictinggammapassingratesforimrtbasedondeliveryfluenceinformedbylogfiles AT miaoxiaojuan deeplearningforpatientspecificqualityassurancepredictinggammapassingratesforimrtbasedondeliveryfluenceinformedbylogfiles AT fusichao deeplearningforpatientspecificqualityassurancepredictinggammapassingratesforimrtbasedondeliveryfluenceinformedbylogfiles AT zhuzhen deeplearningforpatientspecificqualityassurancepredictinggammapassingratesforimrtbasedondeliveryfluenceinformedbylogfiles AT chengyifan deeplearningforpatientspecificqualityassurancepredictinggammapassingratesforimrtbasedondeliveryfluenceinformedbylogfiles AT zhangzhepei deeplearningforpatientspecificqualityassurancepredictinggammapassingratesforimrtbasedondeliveryfluenceinformedbylogfiles AT chenhua deeplearningforpatientspecificqualityassurancepredictinggammapassingratesforimrtbasedondeliveryfluenceinformedbylogfiles AT wanghao deeplearningforpatientspecificqualityassurancepredictinggammapassingratesforimrtbasedondeliveryfluenceinformedbylogfiles AT guhengle deeplearningforpatientspecificqualityassurancepredictinggammapassingratesforimrtbasedondeliveryfluenceinformedbylogfiles AT shaoyan deeplearningforpatientspecificqualityassurancepredictinggammapassingratesforimrtbasedondeliveryfluenceinformedbylogfiles AT duanyanhua deeplearningforpatientspecificqualityassurancepredictinggammapassingratesforimrtbasedondeliveryfluenceinformedbylogfiles AT fengaihui deeplearningforpatientspecificqualityassurancepredictinggammapassingratesforimrtbasedondeliveryfluenceinformedbylogfiles AT zhuoweihai deeplearningforpatientspecificqualityassurancepredictinggammapassingratesforimrtbasedondeliveryfluenceinformedbylogfiles AT xuzhiyong deeplearningforpatientspecificqualityassurancepredictinggammapassingratesforimrtbasedondeliveryfluenceinformedbylogfiles |