Cargando…

A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common and frequently encountered disease of respiratory apparatus and is vulnerable to infection. Increasing studies reveal that bacterial lysates play an encouraging role in preventing exacerbations in these patients. We here investigat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Yongkang, Pei, Yongjian, Qian, Yajuan, Yao, Zhen, Chen, Chen, Du, Juan, Shi, Minhua, Zhou, Tong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9218542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35755034
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.877124
_version_ 1784731914904535040
author Huang, Yongkang
Pei, Yongjian
Qian, Yajuan
Yao, Zhen
Chen, Chen
Du, Juan
Shi, Minhua
Zhou, Tong
author_facet Huang, Yongkang
Pei, Yongjian
Qian, Yajuan
Yao, Zhen
Chen, Chen
Du, Juan
Shi, Minhua
Zhou, Tong
author_sort Huang, Yongkang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common and frequently encountered disease of respiratory apparatus and is vulnerable to infection. Increasing studies reveal that bacterial lysates play an encouraging role in preventing exacerbations in these patients. We here investigated the efficacy and safety of bacterial lysates in COPD. METHODS: We performed systematic research on PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), and Web of Science by using the keywords and their synonyms for studies published before January 11, 2022. Two researchers screened the studies of literature independently according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted data from the included studies. Another two researchers assessed the risk of bias of each included using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using R (version 4.1.1, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing) and Review Manager (version 5.4.0, The Cochrane Collaboration). RESULTS: A total of 12 studies were included in this meta-analysis, and the pooled results showed that bacterial lysates were effective to reduce exacerbation rate (overall: relative risk [RR] = 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72–0.96; alkaline bacterial lysate subgroup [OM-85]: RR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.77–0.98; mechanical bacterial lysate subgroup [Ismigen]: RR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.41–1.20) and mean number of exacerbations (overall: MD = −0.42, 95% CI −0.75 to −0.08; alkaline bacterial lysate subgroup [OM-85]: MD = −0.72, 95% CI −1.35 to −0.09; mechanical bacterial lysate subgroup [Ismigen]: MD = −0.02, 95% CI −0.21 to 0.17). Bacterial lysates were also found beneficial in alleviating symptoms. The side effects were acceptable and slight. CONCLUSION: Bacterial lysates can benefit patients with COPD by reducing exacerbations and alleviating symptoms. OM-85 is the preferable product based on the existing evidence. Further studies are needed to validate these findings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: [www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42022299420].
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9218542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92185422022-06-24 A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Huang, Yongkang Pei, Yongjian Qian, Yajuan Yao, Zhen Chen, Chen Du, Juan Shi, Minhua Zhou, Tong Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common and frequently encountered disease of respiratory apparatus and is vulnerable to infection. Increasing studies reveal that bacterial lysates play an encouraging role in preventing exacerbations in these patients. We here investigated the efficacy and safety of bacterial lysates in COPD. METHODS: We performed systematic research on PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), and Web of Science by using the keywords and their synonyms for studies published before January 11, 2022. Two researchers screened the studies of literature independently according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted data from the included studies. Another two researchers assessed the risk of bias of each included using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using R (version 4.1.1, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing) and Review Manager (version 5.4.0, The Cochrane Collaboration). RESULTS: A total of 12 studies were included in this meta-analysis, and the pooled results showed that bacterial lysates were effective to reduce exacerbation rate (overall: relative risk [RR] = 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72–0.96; alkaline bacterial lysate subgroup [OM-85]: RR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.77–0.98; mechanical bacterial lysate subgroup [Ismigen]: RR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.41–1.20) and mean number of exacerbations (overall: MD = −0.42, 95% CI −0.75 to −0.08; alkaline bacterial lysate subgroup [OM-85]: MD = −0.72, 95% CI −1.35 to −0.09; mechanical bacterial lysate subgroup [Ismigen]: MD = −0.02, 95% CI −0.21 to 0.17). Bacterial lysates were also found beneficial in alleviating symptoms. The side effects were acceptable and slight. CONCLUSION: Bacterial lysates can benefit patients with COPD by reducing exacerbations and alleviating symptoms. OM-85 is the preferable product based on the existing evidence. Further studies are needed to validate these findings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: [www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42022299420]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9218542/ /pubmed/35755034 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.877124 Text en Copyright © 2022 Huang, Pei, Qian, Yao, Chen, Du, Shi and Zhou. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Huang, Yongkang
Pei, Yongjian
Qian, Yajuan
Yao, Zhen
Chen, Chen
Du, Juan
Shi, Minhua
Zhou, Tong
A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_full A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_fullStr A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_full_unstemmed A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_short A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
title_sort meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of bacterial lysates in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9218542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35755034
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.877124
work_keys_str_mv AT huangyongkang ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT peiyongjian ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT qianyajuan ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT yaozhen ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT chenchen ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT dujuan ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT shiminhua ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT zhoutong ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT huangyongkang metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT peiyongjian metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT qianyajuan metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT yaozhen metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT chenchen metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT dujuan metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT shiminhua metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT zhoutong metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease