Cargando…
A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common and frequently encountered disease of respiratory apparatus and is vulnerable to infection. Increasing studies reveal that bacterial lysates play an encouraging role in preventing exacerbations in these patients. We here investigat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9218542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35755034 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.877124 |
_version_ | 1784731914904535040 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Yongkang Pei, Yongjian Qian, Yajuan Yao, Zhen Chen, Chen Du, Juan Shi, Minhua Zhou, Tong |
author_facet | Huang, Yongkang Pei, Yongjian Qian, Yajuan Yao, Zhen Chen, Chen Du, Juan Shi, Minhua Zhou, Tong |
author_sort | Huang, Yongkang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common and frequently encountered disease of respiratory apparatus and is vulnerable to infection. Increasing studies reveal that bacterial lysates play an encouraging role in preventing exacerbations in these patients. We here investigated the efficacy and safety of bacterial lysates in COPD. METHODS: We performed systematic research on PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), and Web of Science by using the keywords and their synonyms for studies published before January 11, 2022. Two researchers screened the studies of literature independently according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted data from the included studies. Another two researchers assessed the risk of bias of each included using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using R (version 4.1.1, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing) and Review Manager (version 5.4.0, The Cochrane Collaboration). RESULTS: A total of 12 studies were included in this meta-analysis, and the pooled results showed that bacterial lysates were effective to reduce exacerbation rate (overall: relative risk [RR] = 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72–0.96; alkaline bacterial lysate subgroup [OM-85]: RR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.77–0.98; mechanical bacterial lysate subgroup [Ismigen]: RR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.41–1.20) and mean number of exacerbations (overall: MD = −0.42, 95% CI −0.75 to −0.08; alkaline bacterial lysate subgroup [OM-85]: MD = −0.72, 95% CI −1.35 to −0.09; mechanical bacterial lysate subgroup [Ismigen]: MD = −0.02, 95% CI −0.21 to 0.17). Bacterial lysates were also found beneficial in alleviating symptoms. The side effects were acceptable and slight. CONCLUSION: Bacterial lysates can benefit patients with COPD by reducing exacerbations and alleviating symptoms. OM-85 is the preferable product based on the existing evidence. Further studies are needed to validate these findings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: [www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42022299420]. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9218542 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92185422022-06-24 A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Huang, Yongkang Pei, Yongjian Qian, Yajuan Yao, Zhen Chen, Chen Du, Juan Shi, Minhua Zhou, Tong Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common and frequently encountered disease of respiratory apparatus and is vulnerable to infection. Increasing studies reveal that bacterial lysates play an encouraging role in preventing exacerbations in these patients. We here investigated the efficacy and safety of bacterial lysates in COPD. METHODS: We performed systematic research on PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), and Web of Science by using the keywords and their synonyms for studies published before January 11, 2022. Two researchers screened the studies of literature independently according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted data from the included studies. Another two researchers assessed the risk of bias of each included using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using R (version 4.1.1, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing) and Review Manager (version 5.4.0, The Cochrane Collaboration). RESULTS: A total of 12 studies were included in this meta-analysis, and the pooled results showed that bacterial lysates were effective to reduce exacerbation rate (overall: relative risk [RR] = 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72–0.96; alkaline bacterial lysate subgroup [OM-85]: RR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.77–0.98; mechanical bacterial lysate subgroup [Ismigen]: RR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.41–1.20) and mean number of exacerbations (overall: MD = −0.42, 95% CI −0.75 to −0.08; alkaline bacterial lysate subgroup [OM-85]: MD = −0.72, 95% CI −1.35 to −0.09; mechanical bacterial lysate subgroup [Ismigen]: MD = −0.02, 95% CI −0.21 to 0.17). Bacterial lysates were also found beneficial in alleviating symptoms. The side effects were acceptable and slight. CONCLUSION: Bacterial lysates can benefit patients with COPD by reducing exacerbations and alleviating symptoms. OM-85 is the preferable product based on the existing evidence. Further studies are needed to validate these findings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: [www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42022299420]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9218542/ /pubmed/35755034 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.877124 Text en Copyright © 2022 Huang, Pei, Qian, Yao, Chen, Du, Shi and Zhou. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Huang, Yongkang Pei, Yongjian Qian, Yajuan Yao, Zhen Chen, Chen Du, Juan Shi, Minhua Zhou, Tong A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease |
title | A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease |
title_full | A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease |
title_fullStr | A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease |
title_short | A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease |
title_sort | meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of bacterial lysates in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9218542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35755034 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.877124 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangyongkang ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT peiyongjian ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT qianyajuan ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT yaozhen ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT chenchen ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT dujuan ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT shiminhua ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT zhoutong ametaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT huangyongkang metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT peiyongjian metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT qianyajuan metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT yaozhen metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT chenchen metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT dujuan metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT shiminhua metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease AT zhoutong metaanalysisontheefficacyandsafetyofbacteriallysatesinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease |