Cargando…
Immunogenicity, Effectiveness, and Safety of Inactivated Virus (CoronaVac) Vaccine in a Two-Dose Primary Protocol and BNT162b2 Heterologous Booster in Brazil (Immunita-001): A One Year Period Follow Up Phase 4 Study
BACKGROUND: Effective and safe vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are critical to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic and will remain the most important tool in limiting the spread of the virus long after the pandemic is over. METHODS: We bring pioneering con...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9218743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35757764 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.918896 |
_version_ | 1784731959819239424 |
---|---|
author | Grenfell, Rafaella F. Q. Almeida, Nathalie B. F. Filgueiras, Priscilla S. Corsini, Camila A. Gomes, Sarah V. C. de Miranda, Daniel A. P. Lourenço, Adelina J. Martins-Filho, Olindo A. de Oliveira, Jaquelline G. Teixeira-Carvalho, Andrea Campos, Guilherme R. F. Nogueira, Mauricio L. Alves, Pedro Augusto Fernandes, Gabriel R. Castilho, Leda R. Lima, Tulio M. de Abreu, Daniel P. B. Alvim, Renata G. F. Silva, Thaís Bárbara de S. Jeremias, Wander de J. Otta, Dayane A. Campi-Azevedo, Ana Carolina |
author_facet | Grenfell, Rafaella F. Q. Almeida, Nathalie B. F. Filgueiras, Priscilla S. Corsini, Camila A. Gomes, Sarah V. C. de Miranda, Daniel A. P. Lourenço, Adelina J. Martins-Filho, Olindo A. de Oliveira, Jaquelline G. Teixeira-Carvalho, Andrea Campos, Guilherme R. F. Nogueira, Mauricio L. Alves, Pedro Augusto Fernandes, Gabriel R. Castilho, Leda R. Lima, Tulio M. de Abreu, Daniel P. B. Alvim, Renata G. F. Silva, Thaís Bárbara de S. Jeremias, Wander de J. Otta, Dayane A. Campi-Azevedo, Ana Carolina |
author_sort | Grenfell, Rafaella F. Q. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Effective and safe vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are critical to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic and will remain the most important tool in limiting the spread of the virus long after the pandemic is over. METHODS: We bring pioneering contributions on the maintenance of the immune response over a year on a real-life basis study in 1,587 individuals (18-90 yrs, median 39 yrs; 1,208 female/379 male) who underwent vaccination with two doses of CoronaVac and BNT162b2 booster after 6-months of primary protocol. FINDINGS: Elevated levels of anti-spike IgG antibodies were detected after CoronaVac vaccination, which significantly decreased after 80 days and remained stable until the introduction of the booster dose. Heterologous booster restored antibody titers up to-1·7-fold, changing overall seropositivity to 96%. Titers of neutralising antibodies to the Omicron variant were lower in all timepoints than those against Delta variant. Individuals presenting neutralising antibodies against Omicron also presented the highest titers against Delta and anti-Spike IgG. Cellular immune response measurement pointed out a mixed immune profile with a robust release of chemokines, cytokines, and growth factors on the first month after CoronaVac vaccination followed by a gradual reduction over time and no increase after the booster dose. A stronger interaction between those mediators was noted over time. Prior exposure to the virus leaded to a more robust cellular immune response and a rise in antibody levels 60 days post CoronaVac than in individuals with no previous COVID-19. Both vaccines were safe and well tolerated among individuals. INTERPRETATION: Our data approach the effectiveness of CoronaVac association with BNT162b2 from the clinical and biological perspectives, aspects that have important implications for informing decisions about vaccine boosters. FUNDING: Fiocruz, Brazil. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9218743 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92187432022-06-24 Immunogenicity, Effectiveness, and Safety of Inactivated Virus (CoronaVac) Vaccine in a Two-Dose Primary Protocol and BNT162b2 Heterologous Booster in Brazil (Immunita-001): A One Year Period Follow Up Phase 4 Study Grenfell, Rafaella F. Q. Almeida, Nathalie B. F. Filgueiras, Priscilla S. Corsini, Camila A. Gomes, Sarah V. C. de Miranda, Daniel A. P. Lourenço, Adelina J. Martins-Filho, Olindo A. de Oliveira, Jaquelline G. Teixeira-Carvalho, Andrea Campos, Guilherme R. F. Nogueira, Mauricio L. Alves, Pedro Augusto Fernandes, Gabriel R. Castilho, Leda R. Lima, Tulio M. de Abreu, Daniel P. B. Alvim, Renata G. F. Silva, Thaís Bárbara de S. Jeremias, Wander de J. Otta, Dayane A. Campi-Azevedo, Ana Carolina Front Immunol Immunology BACKGROUND: Effective and safe vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are critical to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic and will remain the most important tool in limiting the spread of the virus long after the pandemic is over. METHODS: We bring pioneering contributions on the maintenance of the immune response over a year on a real-life basis study in 1,587 individuals (18-90 yrs, median 39 yrs; 1,208 female/379 male) who underwent vaccination with two doses of CoronaVac and BNT162b2 booster after 6-months of primary protocol. FINDINGS: Elevated levels of anti-spike IgG antibodies were detected after CoronaVac vaccination, which significantly decreased after 80 days and remained stable until the introduction of the booster dose. Heterologous booster restored antibody titers up to-1·7-fold, changing overall seropositivity to 96%. Titers of neutralising antibodies to the Omicron variant were lower in all timepoints than those against Delta variant. Individuals presenting neutralising antibodies against Omicron also presented the highest titers against Delta and anti-Spike IgG. Cellular immune response measurement pointed out a mixed immune profile with a robust release of chemokines, cytokines, and growth factors on the first month after CoronaVac vaccination followed by a gradual reduction over time and no increase after the booster dose. A stronger interaction between those mediators was noted over time. Prior exposure to the virus leaded to a more robust cellular immune response and a rise in antibody levels 60 days post CoronaVac than in individuals with no previous COVID-19. Both vaccines were safe and well tolerated among individuals. INTERPRETATION: Our data approach the effectiveness of CoronaVac association with BNT162b2 from the clinical and biological perspectives, aspects that have important implications for informing decisions about vaccine boosters. FUNDING: Fiocruz, Brazil. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9218743/ /pubmed/35757764 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.918896 Text en Copyright © 2022 Grenfell, Almeida, Filgueiras, Corsini, Gomes, de Miranda, Lourenço, Martins-Filho, de Oliveira, Teixeira-Carvalho, Campos, Nogueira, Alves, Fernandes, Castilho, Lima, de Abreu, Alvim, Silva, Jeremias, Otta, Campi-Azevedo and Immunita-001 Team https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology Grenfell, Rafaella F. Q. Almeida, Nathalie B. F. Filgueiras, Priscilla S. Corsini, Camila A. Gomes, Sarah V. C. de Miranda, Daniel A. P. Lourenço, Adelina J. Martins-Filho, Olindo A. de Oliveira, Jaquelline G. Teixeira-Carvalho, Andrea Campos, Guilherme R. F. Nogueira, Mauricio L. Alves, Pedro Augusto Fernandes, Gabriel R. Castilho, Leda R. Lima, Tulio M. de Abreu, Daniel P. B. Alvim, Renata G. F. Silva, Thaís Bárbara de S. Jeremias, Wander de J. Otta, Dayane A. Campi-Azevedo, Ana Carolina Immunogenicity, Effectiveness, and Safety of Inactivated Virus (CoronaVac) Vaccine in a Two-Dose Primary Protocol and BNT162b2 Heterologous Booster in Brazil (Immunita-001): A One Year Period Follow Up Phase 4 Study |
title | Immunogenicity, Effectiveness, and Safety of Inactivated Virus (CoronaVac) Vaccine in a Two-Dose Primary Protocol and BNT162b2 Heterologous Booster in Brazil (Immunita-001): A One Year Period Follow Up Phase 4 Study |
title_full | Immunogenicity, Effectiveness, and Safety of Inactivated Virus (CoronaVac) Vaccine in a Two-Dose Primary Protocol and BNT162b2 Heterologous Booster in Brazil (Immunita-001): A One Year Period Follow Up Phase 4 Study |
title_fullStr | Immunogenicity, Effectiveness, and Safety of Inactivated Virus (CoronaVac) Vaccine in a Two-Dose Primary Protocol and BNT162b2 Heterologous Booster in Brazil (Immunita-001): A One Year Period Follow Up Phase 4 Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Immunogenicity, Effectiveness, and Safety of Inactivated Virus (CoronaVac) Vaccine in a Two-Dose Primary Protocol and BNT162b2 Heterologous Booster in Brazil (Immunita-001): A One Year Period Follow Up Phase 4 Study |
title_short | Immunogenicity, Effectiveness, and Safety of Inactivated Virus (CoronaVac) Vaccine in a Two-Dose Primary Protocol and BNT162b2 Heterologous Booster in Brazil (Immunita-001): A One Year Period Follow Up Phase 4 Study |
title_sort | immunogenicity, effectiveness, and safety of inactivated virus (coronavac) vaccine in a two-dose primary protocol and bnt162b2 heterologous booster in brazil (immunita-001): a one year period follow up phase 4 study |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9218743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35757764 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.918896 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grenfellrafaellafq immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study AT almeidanathaliebf immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study AT filgueiraspriscillas immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study AT corsinicamilaa immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study AT gomessarahvc immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study AT demirandadanielap immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study AT lourencoadelinaj immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study AT martinsfilhoolindoa immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study AT deoliveirajaquellineg immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study AT teixeiracarvalhoandrea immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study AT camposguilhermerf immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study AT nogueiramauriciol immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study AT alvespedroaugusto immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study AT fernandesgabrielr immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study AT castilholedar immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study AT limatuliom immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study AT deabreudanielpb immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study AT alvimrenatagf immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study AT silvathaisbarbarades immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study AT jeremiaswanderdej immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study AT ottadayanea immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study AT campiazevedoanacarolina immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study AT immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study |