Cargando…

Immunogenicity, Effectiveness, and Safety of Inactivated Virus (CoronaVac) Vaccine in a Two-Dose Primary Protocol and BNT162b2 Heterologous Booster in Brazil (Immunita-001): A One Year Period Follow Up Phase 4 Study

BACKGROUND: Effective and safe vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are critical to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic and will remain the most important tool in limiting the spread of the virus long after the pandemic is over. METHODS: We bring pioneering con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grenfell, Rafaella F. Q., Almeida, Nathalie B. F., Filgueiras, Priscilla S., Corsini, Camila A., Gomes, Sarah V. C., de Miranda, Daniel A. P., Lourenço, Adelina J., Martins-Filho, Olindo A., de Oliveira, Jaquelline G., Teixeira-Carvalho, Andrea, Campos, Guilherme R. F., Nogueira, Mauricio L., Alves, Pedro Augusto, Fernandes, Gabriel R., Castilho, Leda R., Lima, Tulio M., de Abreu, Daniel P. B., Alvim, Renata G. F., Silva, Thaís Bárbara de S., Jeremias, Wander de J., Otta, Dayane A., Campi-Azevedo, Ana Carolina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9218743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35757764
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.918896
_version_ 1784731959819239424
author Grenfell, Rafaella F. Q.
Almeida, Nathalie B. F.
Filgueiras, Priscilla S.
Corsini, Camila A.
Gomes, Sarah V. C.
de Miranda, Daniel A. P.
Lourenço, Adelina J.
Martins-Filho, Olindo A.
de Oliveira, Jaquelline G.
Teixeira-Carvalho, Andrea
Campos, Guilherme R. F.
Nogueira, Mauricio L.
Alves, Pedro Augusto
Fernandes, Gabriel R.
Castilho, Leda R.
Lima, Tulio M.
de Abreu, Daniel P. B.
Alvim, Renata G. F.
Silva, Thaís Bárbara de S.
Jeremias, Wander de J.
Otta, Dayane A.
Campi-Azevedo, Ana Carolina
author_facet Grenfell, Rafaella F. Q.
Almeida, Nathalie B. F.
Filgueiras, Priscilla S.
Corsini, Camila A.
Gomes, Sarah V. C.
de Miranda, Daniel A. P.
Lourenço, Adelina J.
Martins-Filho, Olindo A.
de Oliveira, Jaquelline G.
Teixeira-Carvalho, Andrea
Campos, Guilherme R. F.
Nogueira, Mauricio L.
Alves, Pedro Augusto
Fernandes, Gabriel R.
Castilho, Leda R.
Lima, Tulio M.
de Abreu, Daniel P. B.
Alvim, Renata G. F.
Silva, Thaís Bárbara de S.
Jeremias, Wander de J.
Otta, Dayane A.
Campi-Azevedo, Ana Carolina
author_sort Grenfell, Rafaella F. Q.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Effective and safe vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are critical to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic and will remain the most important tool in limiting the spread of the virus long after the pandemic is over. METHODS: We bring pioneering contributions on the maintenance of the immune response over a year on a real-life basis study in 1,587 individuals (18-90 yrs, median 39 yrs; 1,208 female/379 male) who underwent vaccination with two doses of CoronaVac and BNT162b2 booster after 6-months of primary protocol. FINDINGS: Elevated levels of anti-spike IgG antibodies were detected after CoronaVac vaccination, which significantly decreased after 80 days and remained stable until the introduction of the booster dose. Heterologous booster restored antibody titers up to-1·7-fold, changing overall seropositivity to 96%. Titers of neutralising antibodies to the Omicron variant were lower in all timepoints than those against Delta variant. Individuals presenting neutralising antibodies against Omicron also presented the highest titers against Delta and anti-Spike IgG. Cellular immune response measurement pointed out a mixed immune profile with a robust release of chemokines, cytokines, and growth factors on the first month after CoronaVac vaccination followed by a gradual reduction over time and no increase after the booster dose. A stronger interaction between those mediators was noted over time. Prior exposure to the virus leaded to a more robust cellular immune response and a rise in antibody levels 60 days post CoronaVac than in individuals with no previous COVID-19. Both vaccines were safe and well tolerated among individuals. INTERPRETATION: Our data approach the effectiveness of CoronaVac association with BNT162b2 from the clinical and biological perspectives, aspects that have important implications for informing decisions about vaccine boosters. FUNDING: Fiocruz, Brazil.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9218743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92187432022-06-24 Immunogenicity, Effectiveness, and Safety of Inactivated Virus (CoronaVac) Vaccine in a Two-Dose Primary Protocol and BNT162b2 Heterologous Booster in Brazil (Immunita-001): A One Year Period Follow Up Phase 4 Study Grenfell, Rafaella F. Q. Almeida, Nathalie B. F. Filgueiras, Priscilla S. Corsini, Camila A. Gomes, Sarah V. C. de Miranda, Daniel A. P. Lourenço, Adelina J. Martins-Filho, Olindo A. de Oliveira, Jaquelline G. Teixeira-Carvalho, Andrea Campos, Guilherme R. F. Nogueira, Mauricio L. Alves, Pedro Augusto Fernandes, Gabriel R. Castilho, Leda R. Lima, Tulio M. de Abreu, Daniel P. B. Alvim, Renata G. F. Silva, Thaís Bárbara de S. Jeremias, Wander de J. Otta, Dayane A. Campi-Azevedo, Ana Carolina Front Immunol Immunology BACKGROUND: Effective and safe vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are critical to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic and will remain the most important tool in limiting the spread of the virus long after the pandemic is over. METHODS: We bring pioneering contributions on the maintenance of the immune response over a year on a real-life basis study in 1,587 individuals (18-90 yrs, median 39 yrs; 1,208 female/379 male) who underwent vaccination with two doses of CoronaVac and BNT162b2 booster after 6-months of primary protocol. FINDINGS: Elevated levels of anti-spike IgG antibodies were detected after CoronaVac vaccination, which significantly decreased after 80 days and remained stable until the introduction of the booster dose. Heterologous booster restored antibody titers up to-1·7-fold, changing overall seropositivity to 96%. Titers of neutralising antibodies to the Omicron variant were lower in all timepoints than those against Delta variant. Individuals presenting neutralising antibodies against Omicron also presented the highest titers against Delta and anti-Spike IgG. Cellular immune response measurement pointed out a mixed immune profile with a robust release of chemokines, cytokines, and growth factors on the first month after CoronaVac vaccination followed by a gradual reduction over time and no increase after the booster dose. A stronger interaction between those mediators was noted over time. Prior exposure to the virus leaded to a more robust cellular immune response and a rise in antibody levels 60 days post CoronaVac than in individuals with no previous COVID-19. Both vaccines were safe and well tolerated among individuals. INTERPRETATION: Our data approach the effectiveness of CoronaVac association with BNT162b2 from the clinical and biological perspectives, aspects that have important implications for informing decisions about vaccine boosters. FUNDING: Fiocruz, Brazil. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9218743/ /pubmed/35757764 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.918896 Text en Copyright © 2022 Grenfell, Almeida, Filgueiras, Corsini, Gomes, de Miranda, Lourenço, Martins-Filho, de Oliveira, Teixeira-Carvalho, Campos, Nogueira, Alves, Fernandes, Castilho, Lima, de Abreu, Alvim, Silva, Jeremias, Otta, Campi-Azevedo and Immunita-001 Team https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Grenfell, Rafaella F. Q.
Almeida, Nathalie B. F.
Filgueiras, Priscilla S.
Corsini, Camila A.
Gomes, Sarah V. C.
de Miranda, Daniel A. P.
Lourenço, Adelina J.
Martins-Filho, Olindo A.
de Oliveira, Jaquelline G.
Teixeira-Carvalho, Andrea
Campos, Guilherme R. F.
Nogueira, Mauricio L.
Alves, Pedro Augusto
Fernandes, Gabriel R.
Castilho, Leda R.
Lima, Tulio M.
de Abreu, Daniel P. B.
Alvim, Renata G. F.
Silva, Thaís Bárbara de S.
Jeremias, Wander de J.
Otta, Dayane A.
Campi-Azevedo, Ana Carolina
Immunogenicity, Effectiveness, and Safety of Inactivated Virus (CoronaVac) Vaccine in a Two-Dose Primary Protocol and BNT162b2 Heterologous Booster in Brazil (Immunita-001): A One Year Period Follow Up Phase 4 Study
title Immunogenicity, Effectiveness, and Safety of Inactivated Virus (CoronaVac) Vaccine in a Two-Dose Primary Protocol and BNT162b2 Heterologous Booster in Brazil (Immunita-001): A One Year Period Follow Up Phase 4 Study
title_full Immunogenicity, Effectiveness, and Safety of Inactivated Virus (CoronaVac) Vaccine in a Two-Dose Primary Protocol and BNT162b2 Heterologous Booster in Brazil (Immunita-001): A One Year Period Follow Up Phase 4 Study
title_fullStr Immunogenicity, Effectiveness, and Safety of Inactivated Virus (CoronaVac) Vaccine in a Two-Dose Primary Protocol and BNT162b2 Heterologous Booster in Brazil (Immunita-001): A One Year Period Follow Up Phase 4 Study
title_full_unstemmed Immunogenicity, Effectiveness, and Safety of Inactivated Virus (CoronaVac) Vaccine in a Two-Dose Primary Protocol and BNT162b2 Heterologous Booster in Brazil (Immunita-001): A One Year Period Follow Up Phase 4 Study
title_short Immunogenicity, Effectiveness, and Safety of Inactivated Virus (CoronaVac) Vaccine in a Two-Dose Primary Protocol and BNT162b2 Heterologous Booster in Brazil (Immunita-001): A One Year Period Follow Up Phase 4 Study
title_sort immunogenicity, effectiveness, and safety of inactivated virus (coronavac) vaccine in a two-dose primary protocol and bnt162b2 heterologous booster in brazil (immunita-001): a one year period follow up phase 4 study
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9218743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35757764
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.918896
work_keys_str_mv AT grenfellrafaellafq immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study
AT almeidanathaliebf immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study
AT filgueiraspriscillas immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study
AT corsinicamilaa immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study
AT gomessarahvc immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study
AT demirandadanielap immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study
AT lourencoadelinaj immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study
AT martinsfilhoolindoa immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study
AT deoliveirajaquellineg immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study
AT teixeiracarvalhoandrea immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study
AT camposguilhermerf immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study
AT nogueiramauriciol immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study
AT alvespedroaugusto immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study
AT fernandesgabrielr immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study
AT castilholedar immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study
AT limatuliom immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study
AT deabreudanielpb immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study
AT alvimrenatagf immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study
AT silvathaisbarbarades immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study
AT jeremiaswanderdej immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study
AT ottadayanea immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study
AT campiazevedoanacarolina immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study
AT immunogenicityeffectivenessandsafetyofinactivatedviruscoronavacvaccineinatwodoseprimaryprotocolandbnt162b2heterologousboosterinbrazilimmunita001aoneyearperiodfollowupphase4study