Cargando…
Application of Machine Learning Methods in Modeling the Loss of Circulation Rate while Drilling Operation
[Image: see text] Fluid losses into formations are a common operational issue that is frequently encountered when drilling across naturally or induced fractured formations. This could pose significant operational risks, such as well control, stuck pipe, and wellbore instability, which, in turn, lead...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9218981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35755391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c00970 |
_version_ | 1784732011679711232 |
---|---|
author | Alsaihati, Ahmed Abughaban, Mahmoud Elkatatny, Salaheldin Shehri, Dhafer Al |
author_facet | Alsaihati, Ahmed Abughaban, Mahmoud Elkatatny, Salaheldin Shehri, Dhafer Al |
author_sort | Alsaihati, Ahmed |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Fluid losses into formations are a common operational issue that is frequently encountered when drilling across naturally or induced fractured formations. This could pose significant operational risks, such as well control, stuck pipe, and wellbore instability, which, in turn, lead to an increase in well time and cost. This research aims to use and evaluate different machine learning techniques, namely, support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and K nearest neighbor (K-NN) in predicting the loss of circulation rate (LCR) while drilling using solely mechanical surface parameters and interpretation of the active pit volume readings. Actual field data of seven wells, which had suffered partial or severe loss of circulation, were used to build predictive models with an 80:20 training-to-test data ratio, while Well No. 8 was used to compare the performance of the developed models. Different performance metrics were used to evaluate the performance of the developed models. The root-mean-square error (RMSE) and correlation coefficient (R) were used to evaluate the performance of the models in predicting the LCR while drilling. The results showed that K-NN outperformed other models in predicting the LCR in Well No. 8 with an R of 0.90 and an RMSE of 0.17. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9218981 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92189812022-06-24 Application of Machine Learning Methods in Modeling the Loss of Circulation Rate while Drilling Operation Alsaihati, Ahmed Abughaban, Mahmoud Elkatatny, Salaheldin Shehri, Dhafer Al ACS Omega [Image: see text] Fluid losses into formations are a common operational issue that is frequently encountered when drilling across naturally or induced fractured formations. This could pose significant operational risks, such as well control, stuck pipe, and wellbore instability, which, in turn, lead to an increase in well time and cost. This research aims to use and evaluate different machine learning techniques, namely, support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and K nearest neighbor (K-NN) in predicting the loss of circulation rate (LCR) while drilling using solely mechanical surface parameters and interpretation of the active pit volume readings. Actual field data of seven wells, which had suffered partial or severe loss of circulation, were used to build predictive models with an 80:20 training-to-test data ratio, while Well No. 8 was used to compare the performance of the developed models. Different performance metrics were used to evaluate the performance of the developed models. The root-mean-square error (RMSE) and correlation coefficient (R) were used to evaluate the performance of the models in predicting the LCR while drilling. The results showed that K-NN outperformed other models in predicting the LCR in Well No. 8 with an R of 0.90 and an RMSE of 0.17. American Chemical Society 2022-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9218981/ /pubmed/35755391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c00970 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Alsaihati, Ahmed Abughaban, Mahmoud Elkatatny, Salaheldin Shehri, Dhafer Al Application of Machine Learning Methods in Modeling the Loss of Circulation Rate while Drilling Operation |
title | Application of Machine Learning Methods in Modeling
the Loss of Circulation Rate while Drilling Operation |
title_full | Application of Machine Learning Methods in Modeling
the Loss of Circulation Rate while Drilling Operation |
title_fullStr | Application of Machine Learning Methods in Modeling
the Loss of Circulation Rate while Drilling Operation |
title_full_unstemmed | Application of Machine Learning Methods in Modeling
the Loss of Circulation Rate while Drilling Operation |
title_short | Application of Machine Learning Methods in Modeling
the Loss of Circulation Rate while Drilling Operation |
title_sort | application of machine learning methods in modeling
the loss of circulation rate while drilling operation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9218981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35755391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c00970 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alsaihatiahmed applicationofmachinelearningmethodsinmodelingthelossofcirculationratewhiledrillingoperation AT abughabanmahmoud applicationofmachinelearningmethodsinmodelingthelossofcirculationratewhiledrillingoperation AT elkatatnysalaheldin applicationofmachinelearningmethodsinmodelingthelossofcirculationratewhiledrillingoperation AT shehridhaferal applicationofmachinelearningmethodsinmodelingthelossofcirculationratewhiledrillingoperation |