Cargando…
An examination of acute cross-over effects following unilateral low intensity concentric and eccentric exercise()
We compared the effects of low intensity concentric (CON) and eccentric (ECC) exercise on the force and neural responses of the dominant (exercised) elbow flexors (EFs), and studied if these conditions could induce cross-over effects to the contralateral (non-exercised) EFs. Fifteen subjects (8 male...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Chengdu Sport University
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9219316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35782286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smhs.2020.08.002 |
Sumario: | We compared the effects of low intensity concentric (CON) and eccentric (ECC) exercise on the force and neural responses of the dominant (exercised) elbow flexors (EFs), and studied if these conditions could induce cross-over effects to the contralateral (non-exercised) EFs. Fifteen subjects (8 males) completed all conditions (CON and ECC: 6 sets of low intensity exercise to failure; control: rest) in separate visits with a randomized order. Maximal isometric force and electromyography (EMG) of the dominant and contralateral EFs were assessed at pre, immediate-, 24-, and 48-h-post. Two-factor (condition and time) linear mixed-model analyses were performed to examine the force and EMG responses. Immediately post CON, contralateral EFs force was significantly (p = 0.026) higher (12.41%) than control, but no cross-over effects regarding the neural responses were observed. Immediately post ECC, dominant EFs force was significantly lower in ECC, compared to CON (p = 0.003) and control (p < 0.001). This force remained depressed at 24- and 48-h post ECC, when compared to CON (p < 0.001) and control (p < 0.001). Our data suggests that submaximal unilateral exercises are not likely to impair contralateral muscle strength performance. Instead, concentric exercises may acutely improve muscle strength for the contralateral limb. However, this effect is not explained by changes in muscle excitation. |
---|