A Comparative Study of the Effects of Osaterone Acetate and Deslorelin Acetate on Sperm Kinematics and Morpho-Functional Parameters in Dogs

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Benign prostatic hyperplasia affects over 80% of old, non-castrated male dogs. In many cases, the severity of the symptoms means that treatment is required. The treatment of choice is surgical castration, which is unacceptable for the owners of stud dogs who are interested in therapy that does not exclude their animals from breeding. In those cases, treatment with deslorelin acetate or osaterone acetate offers an alternative to surgery. The aim of our study was to compare the changes in semen parameters over time. The deslorelin acetate implant gradually, during the course of its action, led to a full prevention the stud dogs from mating. However, in the first week following implant placement, in some individuals we observed an increase in sperm concentration (flare up effect), offering the possibility to obtain sperm in valuable dogs before the action of deslorelin acetate is completely established, precluding semen collection. On the other hand, osaterone acetate allowed for the continuous reproductive use of a stud dog, as it only affected some semen parameters, and mainly caused a temporary reduction in semen volume with the subsequent increase in semen concentration without altering the libido. ABSTRACT: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the most common problems in older male dogs that often has a huge impact on their health and welfare. This article presents a comparison between osaterone acetate (Ypozane(®); Virbac(®))(OA) and deslorelin acetate (Suprelorin(®); Virbac(®))(DA), medications that are the main therapeutic alternative to castration in dogs with BPH. Forty dogs were divided into four groups: I—negative control (five dogs without BPH); II—positive control (10 individuals diagnosed with BPH); III—15 dogs treated with DA, and IV—10 individuals treated with OA. Semen fractions were collected on days 0 (day of treatment), 7, 14, and 21, and weeks 8, 12, 16, and 20. Macroscopic, microscopic and CASA analyses were performed. Both DA and OA significantly affected the properties of the canine ejaculate. The DA lead to the lack of libido and had lesser effects to the sperm function before it caused azoospermia, whereas OA had no effect on libido and only temporary reduction in seminal plasma volume was observed, which resulted in temporary deterioration in the percentage of motile and progressive spermatozoa.