Cargando…

Roles of 21 Genera of Human Gut Microbiota in Barrett’s Esophagus Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study

Background: Lack of definitive evidence supports the putative hypothesis that gut microbiota dysbiosis is associated with Barrett’s esophagus (BE). We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization study to assess the associations of 21 genera of human gut microbiota with BE. Methods: We identified...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Zhao, Yu, Rong, Deng, Wei, Wang, Weihu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9219910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35754845
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.894900
_version_ 1784732238922907648
author Yang, Zhao
Yu, Rong
Deng, Wei
Wang, Weihu
author_facet Yang, Zhao
Yu, Rong
Deng, Wei
Wang, Weihu
author_sort Yang, Zhao
collection PubMed
description Background: Lack of definitive evidence supports the putative hypothesis that gut microbiota dysbiosis is associated with Barrett’s esophagus (BE). We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization study to assess the associations of 21 genera of human gut microbiota with BE. Methods: We identified independent genetic instruments for 21 genera of gut microbiota (including nine dominant genera, four core genera among individuals of European ancestry, and eight esophagus-specific genera of gut microbiota) from MiBioGen (up to 18,340 participants). We applied them to summary statistics from the largest publicly available genome-wide association study on BE (9,680 cases and 31,211 controls). We obtained the causal estimates of genetically predicted higher genera of gut microbiota and BE using the inverse variance weighting method. Sensitivity analyses included weighted median, MR-Egger, MR-RAPS, and MR-PRESSO. Results: We found that genetically predicted higher Actinomyces (OR: 0.76 per unit increase in log odds of having BE, 95% CI: 0.70–0.83) and higher Ruminiclostridium (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.63–0.90) were significantly associated with a lower risk of BE. No associations of other genera of gut microbiota with BE were noted, apart from suggestive associations of higher Alistipes (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61–0.99), higher Eubacterium (OR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.80–0.99), and higher Veillonella (OR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.56–1.02) with a lower risk of BE, and higher Faecalibacterium (OR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.99–1.33) with a higher risk of BE. Conclusion: This study suggests that higher Actinomyces and higher Ruminiclostridium might protect against BE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9219910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92199102022-06-24 Roles of 21 Genera of Human Gut Microbiota in Barrett’s Esophagus Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study Yang, Zhao Yu, Rong Deng, Wei Wang, Weihu Front Genet Genetics Background: Lack of definitive evidence supports the putative hypothesis that gut microbiota dysbiosis is associated with Barrett’s esophagus (BE). We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization study to assess the associations of 21 genera of human gut microbiota with BE. Methods: We identified independent genetic instruments for 21 genera of gut microbiota (including nine dominant genera, four core genera among individuals of European ancestry, and eight esophagus-specific genera of gut microbiota) from MiBioGen (up to 18,340 participants). We applied them to summary statistics from the largest publicly available genome-wide association study on BE (9,680 cases and 31,211 controls). We obtained the causal estimates of genetically predicted higher genera of gut microbiota and BE using the inverse variance weighting method. Sensitivity analyses included weighted median, MR-Egger, MR-RAPS, and MR-PRESSO. Results: We found that genetically predicted higher Actinomyces (OR: 0.76 per unit increase in log odds of having BE, 95% CI: 0.70–0.83) and higher Ruminiclostridium (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.63–0.90) were significantly associated with a lower risk of BE. No associations of other genera of gut microbiota with BE were noted, apart from suggestive associations of higher Alistipes (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61–0.99), higher Eubacterium (OR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.80–0.99), and higher Veillonella (OR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.56–1.02) with a lower risk of BE, and higher Faecalibacterium (OR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.99–1.33) with a higher risk of BE. Conclusion: This study suggests that higher Actinomyces and higher Ruminiclostridium might protect against BE. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9219910/ /pubmed/35754845 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.894900 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yang, Yu, Deng and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Yang, Zhao
Yu, Rong
Deng, Wei
Wang, Weihu
Roles of 21 Genera of Human Gut Microbiota in Barrett’s Esophagus Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study
title Roles of 21 Genera of Human Gut Microbiota in Barrett’s Esophagus Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study
title_full Roles of 21 Genera of Human Gut Microbiota in Barrett’s Esophagus Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study
title_fullStr Roles of 21 Genera of Human Gut Microbiota in Barrett’s Esophagus Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study
title_full_unstemmed Roles of 21 Genera of Human Gut Microbiota in Barrett’s Esophagus Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study
title_short Roles of 21 Genera of Human Gut Microbiota in Barrett’s Esophagus Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study
title_sort roles of 21 genera of human gut microbiota in barrett’s esophagus risk: a mendelian randomization study
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9219910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35754845
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.894900
work_keys_str_mv AT yangzhao rolesof21generaofhumangutmicrobiotainbarrettsesophagusriskamendelianrandomizationstudy
AT yurong rolesof21generaofhumangutmicrobiotainbarrettsesophagusriskamendelianrandomizationstudy
AT dengwei rolesof21generaofhumangutmicrobiotainbarrettsesophagusriskamendelianrandomizationstudy
AT wangweihu rolesof21generaofhumangutmicrobiotainbarrettsesophagusriskamendelianrandomizationstudy