Cargando…

A Comparative Feasibility Study for Transcranial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy

The potential beneficial regenerative and stimulatory extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) applications to the central nervous system have garnered interest in recent years. Treatment zones for these indications are acoustically shielded by bones, which heavily impact generated sound fields. We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slezak, Cyrill, Flatscher, Jonas, Slezak, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9219950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35740477
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061457
_version_ 1784732249567002624
author Slezak, Cyrill
Flatscher, Jonas
Slezak, Paul
author_facet Slezak, Cyrill
Flatscher, Jonas
Slezak, Paul
author_sort Slezak, Cyrill
collection PubMed
description The potential beneficial regenerative and stimulatory extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) applications to the central nervous system have garnered interest in recent years. Treatment zones for these indications are acoustically shielded by bones, which heavily impact generated sound fields. We present the results of high-resolution tissue-realistic simulations, comparing the viability of different ESWT applicators in their use for transcranial applications. The performances of electrohydraulic, electromagnetic, and piezoelectric transducers for key reflector geometries are compared. Based on density information obtained from CT imaging of the head, we utilized the non-linear wave propagation toolset Matlab k-Wave to obtain spatial therapeutic sound field geometries and waveforms. In order to understand the reliability of results on the appropriate modeling of the skull, three different bone attenuation models were compared. We find that all currently clinically ESWT applicator technologies show significant retention of peak pressures and energies past the bone barrier. Electromagnetic transducers maintain a significantly higher energy flux density compared to other technologies while low focusing strength piezoelectric applicators have the weakest transmissions. Attenuation estimates provide insights into sound field degradation and energy losses, indicating that effective transcranial therapies can readily be attained with current applicators. Furthermore, the presented approach will allow for future targeted in silico development and the design of applicators and therapy plans to ultimately improve therapeutic outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9219950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92199502022-06-24 A Comparative Feasibility Study for Transcranial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Slezak, Cyrill Flatscher, Jonas Slezak, Paul Biomedicines Article The potential beneficial regenerative and stimulatory extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) applications to the central nervous system have garnered interest in recent years. Treatment zones for these indications are acoustically shielded by bones, which heavily impact generated sound fields. We present the results of high-resolution tissue-realistic simulations, comparing the viability of different ESWT applicators in their use for transcranial applications. The performances of electrohydraulic, electromagnetic, and piezoelectric transducers for key reflector geometries are compared. Based on density information obtained from CT imaging of the head, we utilized the non-linear wave propagation toolset Matlab k-Wave to obtain spatial therapeutic sound field geometries and waveforms. In order to understand the reliability of results on the appropriate modeling of the skull, three different bone attenuation models were compared. We find that all currently clinically ESWT applicator technologies show significant retention of peak pressures and energies past the bone barrier. Electromagnetic transducers maintain a significantly higher energy flux density compared to other technologies while low focusing strength piezoelectric applicators have the weakest transmissions. Attenuation estimates provide insights into sound field degradation and energy losses, indicating that effective transcranial therapies can readily be attained with current applicators. Furthermore, the presented approach will allow for future targeted in silico development and the design of applicators and therapy plans to ultimately improve therapeutic outcomes. MDPI 2022-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9219950/ /pubmed/35740477 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061457 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Slezak, Cyrill
Flatscher, Jonas
Slezak, Paul
A Comparative Feasibility Study for Transcranial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy
title A Comparative Feasibility Study for Transcranial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy
title_full A Comparative Feasibility Study for Transcranial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy
title_fullStr A Comparative Feasibility Study for Transcranial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Feasibility Study for Transcranial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy
title_short A Comparative Feasibility Study for Transcranial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy
title_sort comparative feasibility study for transcranial extracorporeal shock wave therapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9219950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35740477
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061457
work_keys_str_mv AT slezakcyrill acomparativefeasibilitystudyfortranscranialextracorporealshockwavetherapy
AT flatscherjonas acomparativefeasibilitystudyfortranscranialextracorporealshockwavetherapy
AT slezakpaul acomparativefeasibilitystudyfortranscranialextracorporealshockwavetherapy
AT slezakcyrill comparativefeasibilitystudyfortranscranialextracorporealshockwavetherapy
AT flatscherjonas comparativefeasibilitystudyfortranscranialextracorporealshockwavetherapy
AT slezakpaul comparativefeasibilitystudyfortranscranialextracorporealshockwavetherapy